AN EXPLORATORY SEQUENTIAL SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF ONLINE LEARNING DURING THE MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER IN MALAYSIA
Keywords:COVID-19, MCO, exploratory sequential, higher education institutions, online learning, sentiment
Purpose – Online learning is an essential platform to support varying learning conditions, anytime and anywhere. It helps connect online communities regardless of one’s geographical location and time zone. During the COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia, the use of online learning platforms has become a crucial option for accomplishing learning objectives. During this challenging time, universities have been looking for suitable solutions to address issues regarding the online learning process. This paper discusses the challenges in online learning, as well as the importance of collaborative learning activities during the Movement Control Order (MCO). Challenges in emotion and changes of routine among students have been detected during the MCO imposed by the government of Malaysia.
Methodology – An exploratory sequential approach was carried out in this study to obtain students’ feedback in terms of their emotions and routine changes during the outbreak of COVID-19 and the subsequent implementation of the MCO. Convenience sampling was used for this research, and in order to obtain feedback on online learning during the MCO an online interview was conducted with 42 students from the Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA branch in the state of Kelantan. The feedback items were recorded and transcribed in Excel format. Next, sentiment analysis was carried out using Rapidminer software.
Findings – The results showed that higher education institutions or universities had to play their part in providing a virtual learning environment as convenient as possible during the Movement Control Order period. The results also showed that educators had to ensure the success of online learning by maintaining the motivation of their students
Significance – The findings in this study can also benefit educators and higher education institutions or universities in executing suitable teaching and learning plans during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Alsaqer, A. F., & Sasi, S. (2017). Movie review summarization and sentiment analysis using rapidminer. In 2017 International Conference on Networks & Advances in Computational Technologies (NetACT) (pp. 329–335). IEEE.
Ameen, N., Willis, R., Abdullah, M. N., & Shah, M. (2019). Towards the successful integration of e‐learning systems in higher education in Iraq: A student perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1434–1446.
Aouidi, S., Lamia, M., & Hafidi, M. (2019). Analysis of learners’ interests in a social learning environment. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications (pp. 1–7).
Bashir, K., Hassan, S. S. S., Abdallah, S. S., & Nordin, M. S. (2018). Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of E-learning Instructional Design Quality. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 4(4), 21–37.
Bourkoukou, O., El Bachari, E., & El Boustani, A. (2019). Building Effective Collaborative Groups in E-Learning Environment. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (pp. 107–117). Springer.
Chary, K. G. (2016). Essentiality of E-Learning to The Developing Countries. E–Learning, 3(12).
Chu, S. K. W., Ravana, S. D., Mok, S. S. W., & Chan, R. C. H. (2019). Behavior, perceptions and learning experience of undergraduates using social technologies during internship. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 881–906.
Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dwivedi, S., Kasliwal, P., & Soni, S. (2016). Comprehensive study of data analytics tools (RapidMiner, Weka, R tool, Knime). In 2016 Symposium on Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Eraslan Yalcin, M., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432.
Freeze, R. D., Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., & Wen, H. J. (2019). IS success model in e-learning context based on students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 4.
Halimi, K., & Seridi-Bouchelaghem, H. (2019). Social Semantic Web-Based Analytics Approach to Support Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 13(5), 635–641.
Hans, S., & Chakraverty, S. (2017). Learning with skills oriented collaborations. International Journal of Learning Technology, 12(3), 190–218.
Hardaker, Glenn and Smith, D. C. (2000). e-learning innovation through the implementation of an internet supported learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 422–432. Retrieved from http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/2137/
Hwang, S., & Song, H. (2018). Effective Social Interaction in Online Learning. National Teacher Education Journal, 11(3).
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.
Jackson, S. H. (2019). Student Questions: A Path to Engagement and Social Presence in the Online Classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 16(1), n1.
Jung, H., Kim, Y., Lee, H., & Shin, Y. (2019). Advanced instructional design for successive E-learning: Based on the successive approximation model (SAM). International Journal on E-Learning, 18(2), 191–204.
Laister, J., & Kober, S. (2002). Social aspects of collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. In Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference Sheffield, March. Citeseer.
Lapointe, J.-F., Kondratova, I., Molyneaux, H., Shaikh, K., & Vinson, N. G. (2017). A review of personal profile features in personalized learning systems. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 46–55). Springer.
Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1).
Lee, H. C., & Blanchard, M. R. (2019). Why teach with PBL? Motivational factors underlying middle and high school teachers’ use of problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 2.
Lew, S.-L., Lau, S.-H., & Leow, M.-C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5(6), e01788.
Lin, J.-W., & Lin, H.-C. K. (2019). User acceptance in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment with social network awareness (SNA) support. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1).
Malaysia, P. M. O. of. (2020). Movement Control Order: FAQ & Info. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.my/2020/03/movement-control-order-faq-info/#pll_switcher
Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.