SUSTAINABILITY OF UPCYCLING: STUDENT ACCEPTANCE IN UUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2018.13.2.6Keywords:
Sustainability, upcycling, student acceptance, entrepreneurshipAbstract
This paper identified factors of student acceptance in the sustainability of upcycling as well as analyzed student acceptance level in the sustainability of upcycling among students of a residential college in Universiti Utara Malaysia (INASIS Grantt). Using student survey-based method in a quantitative approach, this study distributed a set of questionnaires to gather primary data from targeted respondents. A total of 200 respondents were randomly distributed. Printed-out questionnaires were handed out, accompanied by an upcycled product that was built as a real-life product. Data were also collected through completed questionnaires through the use of the Internet. The items in the questionnaire were based on the sustainability of upcycling. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 24. The results of the analysis showed a significant correlation between environmental, economic, and social with student acceptance. It was concluded that INASIS Grantt students accepted upcycling can be a new method on campus to create sustainable products that has the potential of reducing pollution while generating side income. An additional benefit includes reducing waste material at the landfill, when the student can use any recycled item to make some innovation that surely will give a lot of benefit and profit to those who want to make money.
Metrics
References
Banerjee, S. B. (2011). Embedding Sustainability across the Organisation: A Critical Perspective. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(4), 719-731.
Borneo Post Press (2015, May 3). Wanton dumping of old tyres spoil the environment. Borneo Post. Sabah, Malaysia.
Bramston, D., & Maycroft, N. (2013). Designing with waste. In E. Karana, O. Pedgley, & V. Rognoli (Eds.), Materials experience: Fundamentals of materials and design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
Earley, R. (2011). Upcycling textiles: Adding value through design. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/4023/1/ Copenhagen_UT_abstract.pdf
Elkington, J. (1997). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21stâ€century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.
Emgin, B. (2012). Trashion: The return of the disposed. Design Issues, 28(1), 63-71.
Gomez, M. (2014). The art of upcycling: Welding trash into treasure, Welding Journal, 93(3), 86-89.
Kathomi, M. L. (2013). From waste to product; recycling waste tyres to save the environment. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from http://cae.uonbi.ac.ke/sites/ default/files/cae/cae/RECYCLING%20WASTE%20TYRES%20TO%20PRODUCTS..pdf.
Kay, T. (1994). Reiner Pilz. Salvo, 23, 11-14.
Kheiza, K. (2013, June 27). Ini bukan tempat buang tayar [This is not the place to dump tires]. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from http://www.sinarharian.com .my/edisi/melaka-ns/ini-bukan-tempat-buang-tayar-1.176425.
Myers
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.