PADDY RESIDUE AS FEEDSTOCK IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION: REDEMPTION OF LIFE CYCLE EMISSIONS AND COST ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2018.13.1.6Keywords:
Paddy residue, electricity generation, Malaysia, emission saving, cost savingAbstract
Malaysia has an abundance of biomass resources that can be utilised for power generation. One of them is paddy residue. Paddy residue creates a huge potential in the power generation sector. The consumption of paddy residue can help Malaysia become less dependent on conventional sources of energy, mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, offer positive feedback in the economic sector, and at the same time, provide the best solution for waste management activities. The forecast data for 20 years on electricity generation was used to calculate the GHG emission and its saving when paddy residue is used for electricity generation. The government’s cost saving was also identified when paddy residue substituted coal fuel in electricity generation. This paper can provide forecast information so that Malaysia is able to move forward to apply paddy residue as feedstock in energy supply. Hopefully, the data achieved can encourage stakeholder bodies in the implementation of paddy residue in electricity generation since there is a positive impact towards cost and emission saving.
Metrics
References
Bhattacharyya, P., & Barman, D. (2017). Chapter 21 – Crop residue management and greenhouse gases emissions in tropical rice lands. In M. Ã. Muñoz & R. Zornoza (Eds.), Soil Management and Climate Change (pp. 323–335): Academic Press.
Chandran, V. G. R., Sharma, S., & Madhavan, K. (2010). Electricity consumption growth nexus: The case of Malaysia. Energy Policy, 38, 606-612.
Energy Commission. (2011). Laporan tahunan 2011 (pp. 142). Kuala Lumpur: Suruhanjaya Tenaga.
Energy Commission. (2014). Malaysia energy statistics handbook 2014. Kuala Lumpur: Energy Commission.
Energy Commission. (2015). Performance and statistical information on electricity supply industry in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Energy Commission.
Sebastián, F., Royo, J. & Gómez, M. (2011). Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (greenhouse gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (life cycle assessment) methodology. Energy, 36, 2029-2037.
Jabatan Pertanian. (2014). Paddy statistics of Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Agriculture
Keong, C. Y. (2005). Energy demand, economic growth,and energy efficiency—The Bakun dam-induced sustainable enrgy policy revisited. Energy Policy, 33, 679-689.
Koh, S. L., & Lim, Y. S. (2010). Meeting energy demand in developing economy without damaging the environment—A case study in Sabah, Malaysia. Energy Policy, 38, 4719-4728.
Lohan, S. K., Jat, H. S., Yadav, A. K., Sidhu, H. S.,Jat, M. L., Choudhary, M., . . . Sharma, P. C. (2018). Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 693-706.
Mahlia, T. M. I. (2002). Emissions from electricity generation in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 27, 293-300.
NCER. (2007). Northern corridor economic region socioeconomic blueprint 2007-2025. In S. Darby (Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Koridor Utara.
Sarma, D. S. D. (2018). Paddy residue burning: Drivers, challenges and potential solutions. Retrieved 25 July 2018, from http://www.teriin.org/article/paddy-residue-burning-drivers-challenges-and-potential-solutions
Shafie, S. M., Masjuki, H. H., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2014). Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia. Energy, 70, 401-410.
Shekarchian, M., Moghavvemi, M., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Mazandarani, A. (2011). A review on the pattern of electricity generation and emission in Malaysia from 1976 to 2008. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 2629– 2642.
Suruhanjaya Tenaga. (2018). Malaysia Energy Information Hub. Retrieved 1 January 2018, from http://meih.st.gov.my/statistics?p_auth=zCcc6ewV&p_p_id=Eng_Statistic_WAR_STOASPublicPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-1&p_p_col_pos=1&p_p_col_count=2&_Eng_Statistic_WAR_STOASPublicPortlet_execution=e2s1&_Eng_Statistic_WAR_STOASPublicPortlet__eventId=ViewStatistic&categoryId=3&flowId=2
Wang, C., Zhang, L., Chang, Y., & Pang, M. (2015). Biomass direct-fired power generation system in China: An integrated energy, GHG emissions, and economic evaluation for Salix. Energy Policy, 84, 155-165.
Weldemichael, Y. & Aseffa, G. (2015). Assessing the energy production and GHG emissions mitigation potential of biomass resources for Alberta. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4257-4264. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.118
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.