Designing Tangible User Interfaces for Neurodiversity: A Focus on Dyslexia-Friendly Inclusive Design Features

Authors

  • Husniza Husni School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nurul Izzah Abdul Aziz School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Khairul Inas Shaifulrizal School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nor Laily Hashim School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Ilka Zufria Fakultas Sains dan Komputer, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.3.2

Keywords:

Tangible user interfaces, interaction design, inclusive design, neurodiversity, dyslexia

Abstract

Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) provide multisensory interaction and engagement, which are essential for learning for neurodivergent learners, such as children with dyslexia, dyscalculia, and autism spectrum disorder. Given their diverse learning needs, neurodivergent learners require specifically designed tools to support their learning. Existing TUIs provide limited evidence on specific design features, focusing on inclusive reading design for neurodivergent children and on Universal Design principles. Therefore, this paper presents five finalised inclusive design components for TUIs, specifically tailored to address the unique needs of children with reading difficulties. The components were established through thematic analysis of focus group data from five specialised educators using Atlas.ti. The findings revealed five inclusive design components, mapped directly to the five dimensions of interaction design and universal design principles. These components are crucial for triggering multisensory engagement and mitigating text-processing barriers for struggling readers, thereby providing a more inclusive and effective learning session. This effort strives to support UNESCO Sustainable Development Goal 4, which aims to promote inclusive and equitable quality education.

References

Abdul Aziz, N. I., Husni, H., & Hashim, N. L. (2022). Dyslexia-friendly design features for tangible user interfaces: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(4), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2021-0170

Ahmad, S. Z., Ludin, N. N. A. A. N., Ekhsan, H. M., Rosmani, A. F., & Ismail, M. H. (2012). Bijak Membaca—Applying phonic reading technique and multisensory approach with interactive multimedia for dyslexia children. In 2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER) (pp. 554–559). https://doi.org/10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504375

Alias, N. A., & Dahlan, A. (2015). Enduring difficulties: The challenges of mothers in raising children with dyslexia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.213

Antle, A. N., Fan, M., & Cramer, E. S. (2015). PhonoBlocks: A tangible system for supporting children with dyslexia learning to read. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 533–538). https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2687897

Armstrong, T. (2015). The myth of the normal brain: Embracing neurodiversity. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(4), 348–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504

Aziz, F. A., Husni, H., & Jamaludin, Z. (2013). Translating interaction design guidelines for dyslexic children’s reading application. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 977–980).

Aziz, N., & Ikram, J. (2015). Role of focus group discussion (FGD) in e-business research. Open Access Library Journal, 2(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.

Bolhasan, R. A. (2009). A study of dyslexia among primary school students in Sarawak, Malaysia. School of Doctoral Studies (European Union) Journal, 1(1), 250–268.

Bozgeyikli, E., & Bozgeyikli, L. L. (2021). Evaluating object manipulation interaction techniques in mixed reality: Tangible user interfaces and gesture. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (pp. 778–787). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00105

Chase, C. (2025). The dyslexia–ADHD overlap: Why evaluators confuse the conditions. ADDitude Magazine.

Cramer, E. S., Antle, A. N., & Fan, M. (2016). The code of many colours: Evaluating the effects of a dynamic colour-coding scheme on children’s spelling in a tangible software system. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 473–485). https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.293069

Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021

Dubuc, L., & Edge, D. (2006). TUIs to ease: Tangible user interfaces in assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology.

Fan, M., & Antle, A. N. (2015). Tactile letters: A tangible tabletop with texture cues supporting alphabetic learning for dyslexic children. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 673–678). https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2688806

Fan, M., Antle, A. N., & Cramer, E. S. (2016). Design rationale: Opportunities and recommendations for tangible reading systems for children. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 101–112). https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930690

Fan, M., Antle, A. N., Hoskyn, M., & Neustaedter, C. (2018). A design case study of a tangible system supporting young English language learners. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.08.001

Fan, M., Antle, A. N., Hoskyn, M., Neustaedter, C., & Cramer, E. S. (2017). Why tangibility matters: A design case study of at-risk children learning to read and spell. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1805–1816). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026048

Garzotto, F., & Gonella, R. (2011). An open-ended tangible environment for disabled children’s learning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 52–61). https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999037

Han, X., Li, R., Wang, J., Qin, S., & Ding, G. (2018). Identification of key design characteristics for complex product adaptive design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95, 1215–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1267-0

Interaction Design Foundation. (2025). The five languages or dimensions of interaction design. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/the-five-languages-or-dimensions-of-interaction-design.

Jamali, S. N., Admodisastro, N., Abd Ghani, A. A., Hassan, S. A., Kamaruddin, A., & Hamid, S. S. A. (2018). Exploring design guidelines of tangible interaction in learning for children with dyslexia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.31), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.31.23361

Jamali, S. N., Admodisastro, N., Kamaruddin, A., Abd Ghani, A. A., & Hassan, S. (2019). Design guidelines of tangible interaction learning model for children with dyslexia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(2), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet. v7i4.31.22073

Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0028353

Lee, J. J., & Lee, K. P. (2009). Facilitating dynamics of focus group interviews in East Asia: Evidence and tools from a cross-cultural study. International Journal of Design, 3(1), 17-28.

Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9

Pandey, S., & Srivastava, S. (2011a). SpellBound: A tangible spelling aid for the dyslexic child. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 101–104). https://doi.org/10.1145/2407796.2407813

Pandey, S., & Srivastava, S. (2011b). Tiblo: A tangible learning aid for children with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (pp. 211–220). https://doi.org/10.1145/2079216.2079247

Sanfilippo, F., Blazauskas, T., Salvietti, G., Ramos, I., Vert, S., Radianti, J., & Oliveira, D. (2022). A perspective review on integrating VR/AR with haptics into STEM education for multisensory learning. Robotics, 11(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11020041

Sarudin, N. A. A., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Multisensory approach: How it helps in improving word recognition? Creative Education, 10(12), 3186. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce. 2019.1012242

Shah, P. J., Boilson, M., Rutherford, M., Prior, S., Johnston, L., Maciver, D., & Forsyth, K. (2022). Neurodevelopmental disorders and neurodiversity: Definition of terms from Scotland’s National Autism Implementation Team. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 221(3), 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2022.43

Shaywitz, S. E. (2020). Overcoming dyslexia (2nd ed.). Knopf.

Silver, K. (2007). What puts the design in interaction design. UX Matters, 3, 3–77. https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/08/what-puts.

So, H. J., Hwang, Y. E., Wang, Y., & Lee, E. (2018). Unpacking the potential of tangible technology in education: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology International, 19(2), 199–228.

Soratto, J., Pires, D. E. P. D., & Friese, S. (2020). Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: Potentialities for research in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250

Teh, T. T. L., Ng, K. H., & Parhizkar, B. (2015). TraceIt: An air tracing reading tool for children with dyslexia. In Advances in Visual Informatics: 4th International Visual Informatics Conference (pp. 356–366). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25939-0_

The Centre for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. North Carolina State University. https://universaldesign.ie/about-universal-design/the-7-principles.

Ullmer, B., & Ishii, H. (1997). The metaDESK: Models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 223–232). https://doi.org/10.1145/263407.263551

Ullmer, B., & Ishii, H. (2000). Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3–4), 915–931. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.393.0915

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Information and Communication Technology (JICT) Vol.25, No.3, July 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Information and Communication Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Husni, H., Abdul Aziz, N. I., Shaifulrizal, M. K. I., Hashim, N. L., & Zufria, I. (2026). Designing Tangible User Interfaces for Neurodiversity: A Focus on Dyslexia-Friendly Inclusive Design Features. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 25(3), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2026.25.3.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2026.25.3.2 OpenAlex W7171510212 Scopus 105047464463

Most read articles by the same author(s)