Requirements of Enjoyable Mobile Learning Applications for Deaf Children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2024.23.1.3Keywords:
Enjoyable mobile learning application, requirements, disable peopleAbstract
In the domain of mobile learning applications for deaf children, many studies are more concerned with the development of mobile learning applications for deaf children than with determining what makes them enjoyable for this group of children. Some of these learning applications do not meet the needs of deaf children for learning since the requirements were not collected from the actual deaf children. As a result, many deaf learning applications are still not gaining much popularity among people who are deaf or hard of hearing due to the application due to the applications’ inability to meet their expectations and needs. Hence, this paper aims to identify the requirements for designing an enjoyable mobile learning application for deaf children. In achieving this goal, it is essential to identify the requirements of deaf children on mobile learning applications from their own everyday experience and support these identified needs with requirements gathered from their parents and teachers and literature. Three methods were conducted for this study to identify and synthesise these requirements: (1) Fun Sorter data collection method was conducted among the deaf children, whose ages are between 7 and 12 years old; (2) an interview involving teachers and parents of deaf children; and (3) a literature review on deaf children’s learning. The identified requirements were verified through a focused group attended by eight mobile learning developers. The finding identified six requirements: multimedia elements, games, easy-to-use, simple tasks, guidance,
and alerting. These requirements serve as crucial guidelines for mobile app developers, enabling the creation of enjoyable learning
applications designed specifically for deaf children. Furthermore, these requirements can potentially improve the learning journey of
deaf children, offering them valuable benefits and enhancing their educational experiences.
References
Al-Megren, S., & Almutairi, A. (2019). Analysis of user requirements for a mobile augmented reality application to support literacy development amongst deaf children. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 18(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2019.18.1.8283
Alias, A., Sharif, N., Baharuddin, N., Hamzah, M., & Zahari, F. (2016). Penerokaan kesan pengajaran dan pembelajaran menggunakan imej visual dalam kalangan pelajar cacat pendengaran. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 145–162.
Basas, M. M., & Pagliaro, C. M. (2014). Technology use among adults who are deaf and hard of hearing: A national survey. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enu005
Bitar, H., Alsulami, R., & Alahmadi, S. (2021). Building and evaluating an Android mobile app for people with hearing disabilities in Saudi Arabia to provide a real-time video transcript: A design science research study. Romanian Journal of Information Technology and Automatic Control, 31(3), 109–122.
Bragg, D., Rector, K., & Ladner, R. E. (2015). A user-powered American sign language dictionary. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work and Social Computing, March 2015, 1837–1848. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675226
Darus, N. M., Abdullah, N. T., & Mutalib, A. A. (2012). iMSL: Malay Sign Language for the deaf and hearing-impaired. Knowledge Management International Conference, July, 647–651. http://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/9745%0Ahttp://files/11/Darus et al. - 2012 - iMSL Malay Sign Language for the Deaf and Hearing.pdf
Department of Social Welfare Malaysia (2020). Laporan Statistik 2019. Portal Rasmi Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat. https://www.jkm. Journal of ICT, 23, No. 1 (January) 2024, pp: 49-gov.my/jkm/uploads/files/pdf/laporan_statistik/FINAL%20 Web%20Upload%20-%20Laporan%20Statistik%202019.pdf
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D., & Beale, R. (2004). HumanComputer Interaction (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
González-González, C., Toledo-Delgado, P., Collazos-Ordoñez, C., & González-Sánchez, J. L. (2014). Design and analysis of collaborative interactions in social educational video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.039
Guzmán, R. (2018). The 4 Types of UX Interview Questions to Master. UXBeginner.Com. https://www.uxbeginner.com/the-4-typesof-ux-interview-questions-to-master/
Hallowell, M. R., & Gambatese, J. A. (2010). Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 99-107.
Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between users and product. In Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F. & Wright P. C. (Eds.), Funology: From usability to enjoyment (pp. 31–42). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5
Haug, T. (2014). Methodological and theoretical issues in the adaptation of sign language tests: An example from the adaptation of a test to German Sign Language. Language Testing, 29(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211421509
Kraleva, R., & Kralev, V. (2018). An evaluation of the mobile apps for children with special education needs based on the utility function metrics. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(6), 2269–2277. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.6.6309
Latiff, H. S. A., Razali, R., & Ismail, F. F. (2019). User interface design guidelines for children’s mobile learning applications. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 3311–3319. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5434.098319
Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Research methods in human-computer interaction. In Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-70536-5.50047-6
Marin, M. F., Tapia, V. P., & Salguero, M. T. E. (2019). Measurement of the impact on the usability of an iPad game developed with a design guide built by children. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18(2019), 59–92. Journal of ICT, 23, No. 1 (January) 2024, pp: 49-
Marschark, M., & Spencer, P. E. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language. Oxford University Press.
Mohamed, S. F. P. (2015). A process-based approach software certification model for agile and secure environment. Doctoral Thesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Molnár, D. (2018). Product Design for Kids: A UX Guide to the Child’s Mind. UX Studio. https://uxstudioteam.com/ux-blog/ design-for-kids/ Mutalib, A. A., Salam, S. N. A., Ahmad, M., Mahmuddin, M., & Yahaya, S. N. S. (2016). Assistive video or assistive courseware: What do deaf learners say? International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 1761, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960859
Nathan, S. S. (2017). A Usability Evaluation Model for Hearing Impaired Mobile Applications Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Nathan, S. S., Hussain, A., & Hashim, N. L. (2018). Usability evaluation of DEAF mobile application interface: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2018.291.297
Pienimäki, M., Kinnula, M., & Iivari, N. (2021). Finding fun in nonformal technology education. International Journal of ChildComputer Interaction, 29, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijcci.2021.100283
Ping, T. P., Dennis, P. S., Julaihi, A. A., & Ling, M. G. B. (2022). Mobile learning model for children with special learning needs. European Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejte.v4i3.815
Read, J. C., & MacFarlane, S. (2006). Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in Child Computer Interaction. Proceeding of the 2006 Conference on Interaction
Design and Children, IDC ’06, 2006, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139096
Samsudin, M. R., Guan, T. T., Yusof, A. M., & Mustapha, A. (2018). Effectiveness of Malaysian sign language mobile application in teaching and learning for deaf and mute students. Advanced Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 2(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ajtve.2018.1.4
Shelton, B. E., & Parlin, M. A. (2016). Teaching Math to deaf/hardof-hearing (DHH) children using mobile games. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2016010101 Journal of ICT, 23, No. 1 (January) 2024, pp: 49-
Sim, G., Read, J. C., & Fitton, D. (2021). Introducing the CCI UX playbook. Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children,
IDC 2021, 695–697. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3464486
Siong, T. J., Nasir, N. R. M., & Salleh, F. H. M. (2021). A mobile learning application for Malaysian sign language education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1860(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1860/1/012004
Tan, J., Rönkkö, K., & Gencel, C. (2013). A framework for software usability and user experience measurement in the mobile industry. Proceedings - Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product
Measurement, IWSM-MENSURA 2013, 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSM-Mensura.2013.31
World Health Organization (2021). WHO: 1 in 4 people is projected to have hearing problems by 2050. https://www.who.int/ news/item/02-03-2021-who-1-in-4-people-projected-to-havehearing-problems-by-2050.
Yeratziotis, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2018). A heuristic evaluation for deaf web user experience (HE4DWUX). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(3), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1339940
Yeratziotis, G., & Van Greunen, D. (2013). Making ICT accessible for the deaf. IST-Africa 2013 Conference Proceedings, 1–9.
Yousaf, K., Mehmood, Z., Saba, T., Rehman, A., Rashid, M., Altaf, M., & Shuguang, Z. (2018). A novel technique for speech recognition and visualization based mobile application to support twoway communication between deaf-mute and normal peoples.
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1013234
Zachariah, B., & Nonyelum, O. F. (2020). A comparative analysis of requirement gathering techniques. IUP Journal of Computer Sciences, 14(2), 7–32. Journal of ICT, 23, No. 1 (January) 2024, pp: 49-
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Information and Communication Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
2002 - 2020






















