Visual Framing in Hospitality Marketing: The Role of Camera Angle and Human Presence in Shaping Travelers’ Emotional Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jcisc2025.4.18Keywords:
Camera angle, Emotional appeal, Hospitality marketing, Human element, Visual persuasionAbstract
Visual imagery plays a central role in influencing travel decisions, with hotel-room photographs often forming a traveller’s first impression of a property. Previous research suggests that specific compositional elements can shape viewers’ emotional responses to images. However, the extent to which these cues affect real-world audiences remains unclear, particularly in hospitality settings where multiple factors influence perception. This study tests whether two common photographic cues, i.e, camera angle and inclusion of human elements, shape travellers’ emotional evaluations of hotel-room images. In a departure-hall field survey at Langkawi International Airport (N = 455), travellers viewed six photos produced by crossing human element (i.e., present vs. absent) with camera angle (i.e., high, eye-level, low) and rated them on their emotional impacts (i.e., relaxation, comfort, security, and welcome). Mann–Whitney tests showed no significant human-element effect (p > .22). Kruskal–Wallis tests showed no significant camera-angle effect (p > .26) and no six-group differences (p > .08). The findings suggest that, once overall photographic quality is strong, these compositional cues alone have limited impact on immediate emotional appeal. Accordingly, hospitality marketers should prioritise enhancing overall image quality and ensuring message congruence, rather than relying on prescriptive compositional rules such as including people or specific perspectives.
References
Bai, B., Law, R., & Wen, I. (2022). Visual storytelling in hospitality marketing: Contextual and cultural influences on consumer response. Tourism Management, 89, 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104446
Bigné, J. E., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2005). The theme park experience: Analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism Management, 26(6), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.05.006
Cores-Sarría, J., Hale, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (2022). Emotional response to camera angle: Effects on arousal in still images. Media Psychology, 25(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1921394
Fesenmaier, D. R., Xiang, Z., Pan, B., & Law, R. (2022). Digital Tourism Marketing: Theory, Data, and Practice. Springer International Publishing.
Gall, D., & Latoschik, M. E. (2020). Camera angles and user experience in virtual environments: Dominance and excitement effects. Computers & Graphics, 90, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2020.05.006
Gretzel, U., Yuan, Y. L., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2000). Preparing for the new era: Professional imagery and destination marketing. Journal of Travel Research, 39(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900205
Han, H., & Jeong, C. (2013). Relaxation and repeat-stay intention: The role of hotel-room imagery. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.07.002
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
Hudson, S., & Hudson, L. (2017). Marketing for tourism, hospitality and events: A global and digital approach. SAGE.
Kim, J., & Lennon, S. J. (2013). Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention: Based on the stimulus–organism–response model. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931311316734
Kim, W. G., Mattila, A. S., & Baloglu, S. (2011). Effects of gender and expertise on consumers’ motivation to read online hotel reviews. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 52(4), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965510394357
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lee, S., Lee, J., & Lee, K. (2023). Psychological effects of camera orientation in hospitality photography: Cultural context and approach-avoidance behavior. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221138127
Lee, S., Lee, H., & Lee, C. H. (2023). Effects of vertical camera orientation on consumer approach–avoidance responses in tourism websites. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(2), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221133423
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
Li, X., Scott, N., & Walters, G. (2015). Current and potential methods for measuring emotion in tourism experiences: A review. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(9), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.751207
Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Sage Publications.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
Park, S., Back, K., Bufquin, D., & Nutta, M. (2021). Social presence and booking intent: Evaluation of hotel-room photography. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1849234
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Stienmetz, J. L., Aufegger, L., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2022). Virtual tours and hotel experiences: Effects on customer perception and decision-making. Journal of Travel Research, 61(6), 1198–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875221102973
Tussyadiah, I. P., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2009). Mediating tourist experiences: Access to places via shared videos. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2008.10.001
Xiang, Z., Magnini, V. P., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2015). Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: Insights from travel planning using the internet. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.08.005
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Creative Industry and Sustainable Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
