Publication Ethics

 

JJournal of Creative Industry and Sustainable Culture (JCISC) is committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards for all parties involved in the act of publishing in a peer-reviewed journal: the author, the editor of the journal, the peer reviewer and the publisher JCISC publishing ethics, both internally and externally, are based on- and adhere to- the Committee on Publication Ethics's (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Conduct for Journal Publishers.

 

 

Accountability and Plagiarism: The editors of a peer-reviewed journal are accountable and responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. It is our routine procedure to run all submission through plagiarism detection software. Our acceptance rate is <20%. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers when making this decision.

 

Fair play: An editor should evaluate manuscripts for those intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

 

Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Reviewers must keep information pertaining to the manuscript confidential. Reviewers must bring to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief any information that may be reason to reject publication of a manuscript. Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content.

 

Each paper is first reviewed by the editor and, if it is judged suitable for this publication, it is then sent to two referees for double blind peer review. Manuscripts will be reviewed by the Editorial Board and at least one independent referee. Decisions regarding the publication of a manuscript will be based on the Board's recommendations. Manuscripts submitted by members of the journal's Editorial Board are subjected to the same review procedure.

 

 

Reporting standards: Authors should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. Authors should describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.

 

Originality, plagiarism and acknowledgement of sources: Authors should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarized, and has not been published elsewhere - fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. If an author has used the work and/or words of others, that this original is been appropriately cited or quoted and accurately reflects individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting.

 

Data Access and Retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

 

Ethics: Authors should only submit papers only on work that has been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and that complies with all relevant legislation.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

 

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

 

Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Journal of Creative Industry and Sustainable Culture (JCISC) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and taking all possible measures against publication malpractice.

1. Allegations of Misconduct
JCISC follows the guidelines and flowcharts provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) when dealing with allegations of research and publication misconduct (including plagiarism, data fabrication, falsification, redundant publication, and improper authorship attribution).

2. Procedures for Investigation
If misconduct is suspected or alleged—whether by reviewers, readers, or internal editors—the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board will initiate a formal investigation using the following procedure:

i. Initial Review: The Editor-in-Chief evaluates the evidence provided. The manuscript or published article will be placed on hold during the review.

ii. Communication with Authors: The corresponding author will be contacted and given an opportunity to respond to the allegations within a specified timeframe (typically 14 to 30 days).

iii. Involvement of Institutions: If necessary, the editorial team may contact the authors' home institution or funding bodies to seek clarification or request a formal institutional inquiry.

3. Actions and Sanctions
If an act of misconduct is confirmed, the journal will take appropriate actions depending on the severity of the violation:

i. Before Publication: Immediate rejection of the submitted manuscript and a temporary or permanent ban on future submissions from the authors involved.

ii. After Publication: Issuance of a formal Correction (Corrigendum/Erratum) for minor errors, or a Formal Retraction of the article for serious violations (e.g., severe plagiarism or fabricated data). Retracted papers will remain publicly accessible but clearly marked with a "RETRACTED" watermark alongside a Retraction Notice.

Notification: The authors' institution, relevant funding bodies, or regulatory authorities may be officially informed of the outcome.

 

 

Journal of Creative Industry and Sustainable Culture (JCISC) published by UUM Press is an open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). This licence permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction provided that the authors, citation details and publisher are clearly identified. For any reuse or distribution, make clear that the article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution license.