Evaluating Perceived Immersiveness in a Self-Competition VR Cycling Exergame Post-Prototyping Enhancements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jcisc2025.4.12Keywords:
Gamification, immersion, VR Fitness, user experience, user engagementAbstract
Virtual Reality (VR) cycling exergames have gained attention for promoting physical activity through immersive environments. However, the sense of player immersiveness, defined as how engaged and present users feel, remains underexplored, particularly following iterative prototype refinements. This study evaluates perceived immersiveness in a self-competition VR cycling exergame enhanced based on prior pilot feedback. A total of 51 healthy participants, aged 21 to 39, experienced a standardized gameplay session using the improved prototype. Immediately after, they rated their immersion using a 10-point Likert type scale and responded to open-ended questions regarding their experience. Results revealed a high average immersion score (mean = 8.37), with most responses clustered at 8 and 9. Qualitative feedback highlighted visual fidelity, system responsiveness, and adaptive feedback as key factors enhancing immersion. Participants also expressed enjoyment and motivation influenced by the self-competition feature. Unlike prior studies that primarily assessed motivation or usability, this work provides one of the first quantitative measures of perceived immersion following system refinement. The findings offer practical implications for VR fitness developers, particularly in designing self-competition mechanics and responsive feedback systems to sustain user motivation and engagement. These findings indicate that personalized feedback and competitive mechanics can significantly enhance user immersion in VR exergames. This study contributes new evidence to the literature and provides actionable insights for future applications of VR exergames in health, fitness, and rehabilitation contexts.
References
Anderson-Hanley, C., Snyder, A. L., Nimon, J. P., & Arciero, P. J. (2011). Social facilitation in virtual reality-enhanced exercise: Competitiveness moderates exercise effort of older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 6, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S25337
Bahrin, A. S., Sunar, M. S., & Azman, A. (2021, December). Enjoyment as gamified experience for informal learning in virtual reality. In International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (pp. 383–399). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92182-6_25
Bahrin, A. S., Sunar, M. S., Latip, H. F. M., & Zamri, M. N. (2022). Chronology of self-competition in virtual reality exergames: A historical review. Entertainment Computing, 43, 100513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100513
Bahrin, A. S., Sunar, M. S., & Latip, H. F. M. (2023, November). Self-competition virtual reality cycling for enhanced motivation: Interactive feedforward adjustments. In International Conference on Innovation and Technology in Sports (pp. 99–105). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6769-4_12
Barathi, S. C., Finnegan, D. J., Farrow, M., Whaley, A., Heath, P., Buckley, J., & Lutteroth, C. (2018, April). Interactive feedforward for improving performance and maintaining intrinsic motivation in VR exergaming. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173786 In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173786
Craig, T. V., Rhodes, R. E., & Sui, W. (2024). Examining and comparing the energy expenditure of two modes of a virtual reality fitness game (Supernatural): Indirect calorimetry study. JMIR Serious Games, 12(1), e53999. https://doi.org/10.2196/53999
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Farrow, M., Lutteroth, C., Rouse, P. C., & Bilzon, J. L. (2019). Virtual-reality exergaming improves performance during high-intensity interval training. European Journal of Sport Science, 19(6), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1542459
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014, January). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hibbs, A., Tempest, G., Hettinga, F., & Barry, G. (2024). Impact of virtual reality immersion on exercise performance and perceptions in young, middle-aged and older adults. PLOS ONE, 19(10), e0307683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307683
Keppel, J., Strauss, M., Zhang, S., Stroehnisch, M., Lewin, S., Gruenefeld, U.,& Schneegass, S. (2025, April). The impact of bike-based controllers and adaptive feedback on immersion and enjoyment in a virtual reality cycling exergame. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706599.3720096
Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2
Michael, A., & Lutteroth, C. (2020, April). Race yourselves: A longitudinal exploration of self-competition between past, present, and future performances in a VR exergame. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376256
Shaw, L. A., Buckley, J., Corballis, P. M., Lutteroth, C., & Wünsche, B. C. (2016). Competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e92. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.92
Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect, 3(3), 1–5.
Slater, M., Linakis, V., Usoh, M., & Kooper, R. (1996, July). Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: An experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 163–172). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3304181.3304205
Sunar, M. S., Bahrin, A. S., Mohd Nor, N. N., Daud, H. A., & Azman, A. (2022). Design and testing of virtual reality cycling exergame using handheld controller. Journal of Creative Industry & Sustainable Culture, 1(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.58459/jcisc.v1i1.15
Tuveri, E., Macis, L., Sorrentino, F., Spano, L. D., & Scateni, R. (2016, June). Fitmersive games: Fitness gamification through immersive VR. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 212–215). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909132.2909272
World Health Organization. (2024, June 26). Physical activity. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
Xu, W., Liang, H. N., Yu, K., & Baghaei, N. (2021, May). Effect of gameplay uncertainty, display type, and age on virtual reality exergames. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445801
Yoo, S., Carter, M., & Kay, J. (2018, October). VRmove: Design framework for balancing enjoyment, movement and exertion in VR games. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (pp. 295–307). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3272054
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Creative Industry and Sustainable Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
