Research Article Published 3 December 2014

Entrepreneurial Development and its Learning Process: Evidence from Indonesia

How to Cite

How to Cite

Rohmat, H., Minai, M. S., & Hj. Din, M. S. (2014). Entrepreneurial Development and its Learning Process: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 4(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2014.4.0.8880
H Rohmat
Kolej Universiti Negeri Surakarta, Solo, Indonesia
Mohd Sobri Minai
College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Mohd Salleh Hj. Din
Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
307
Abstract + full text
Downloads
209 +2
PDF and XML
Percentile
88th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

The paper offers an understanding of the process of entrepreneurial learning that is critical to the development of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. The paper reveals the relationship between entrepreneurial learning process and the success of the business among small-scale entrepreneurs for selected learning types. The materials for analysis were obtained from a field work conducted in Surakarta, Indonesia by using a survey method. Four hundred and eighty-five 485 respondents were identified based on stratified random sampling for urban, suburban and rural areas. The total population identified was 1,040 small entrepreneurs. The reliability of the research instrument was 0.9, which is considered high. It was found that the types of learning, i.e., formal, non-formal and informal, had different effects on the learning process of small-scale entrepreneurs. Such findings are important to the development of the entrepreneurial learning and policy to improve the effectiveness of entrepreneurship development program.

Entrepreneurial learning process entrepreneurial learning types entrepreneurial development Indonesia

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
Crossref
1
Deposited reference lists only View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
0
0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 307
PDF downloads 209
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 88th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.27
Works this article cites 16

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 20
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Gibb, A. A., (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance: Mythical concepts, assumptions, rituals and confusion. International Small Business Journal, 18(3),13-35.
  2. Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L., (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  3. Harkins, A., (2004). Knowledge bases and innovation cluster. Conference on Knowledge Cluster and Entrepreneurship in Regional Economic Development. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 13-14 April.
  4. Lumpkin, G.T., and Dess, G. G., (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
  5. Lussier, R. N., (1995). A nonfinancial success versus failure prediction model for young firm. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1), 8-21.
  6. McMullan, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Vesper, K., (2001). Some problems in using subjective measures of effectiveness to evaluate entrepreneurial assistance programs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(1), 37-54.
  7. Minai, M. S., (2013). Research works by university lecturers in small firms and entrepreneurship: The way forward. Keynote speech at the Conference on Business Management Research 2013 (CBMR2013): Contemporary Issues in Business and Management, EDC UUM, 11 December.
  8. Minai, M. S., and Lucky, I. O. E., (2011). The conceptual framework of the effect of location on performance of small firms. Asian Social Science Journal, 7(12), 110-
  9. Powell, B., (2007). Making poor nations rich. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  10. Rae, D., and Carswell, M., (2000). Understanding entrepreneurial learning of question of how? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 6(3), 145-59.
  11. Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., and Hay, M., (2001). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Babson: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
  12. Ridwan, A., (2013). Faktor keberkesanan penggunaan pembiayaan mudharabah bagi industri kecil dan sederhana dan peranan pihak ketiga. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  13. Schaper, M., and Volery, T., (2004). Entrepreneurship and small business: A Pacific Rim Perspective. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Sudjana., (2004). Pendidikan nonformal. Bandung: Falah Production.
  15. Suryana., (2003). Kewirausahaan pedoman praktis, kiat dan proses menuju sukses. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
  16. Suwaidan T. M., and Faishal., (2004). Sukses tanpa batas: Panduan perjalanan menuju kesuksesan dunia dan akherat. Jakarta: Maghfiroh Pustaka.
  17. Wang, C. L., (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635-657.
  18. Wickham, P. A., (1998). Strategic entrepreneurship. London: Pitman Publishing.
  19. Wilson, D., and Stupnytska, A., (2007). The N-11: More than an acronym. Global Economic Paper, No: 153, Goldman Sachs.
  20. World Competitiveness Yearbook., (2007). Lausanne. Switzerland: IMD International.

Most read articles by the same author(s)