Order Fulfillment in Supply Chain Management: Does the Dimension of Inventory Management Matter in the Aerospace Industry in Malaysia?
How to Cite
How to Cite
Article
Inventory management is important in meeting customers’ requirements. Similarly, the effectiveness of supply chain management in the order fulfillment process is critical for the organization to stay in business. Inventory determines the service level of any organization as the adequate and timely flow of inventory across the supply chain and manufacturing processes is imperative for the success of the organization. This ensures high rating on order fulfillment and ensures profitability. In the supply chain, inventory management is a critical part of the process as inventory is an asset and any shortage of inventory impact performance negatively. To keep the right level of inventory is a challenge for all companies and the challenge is becoming more complex with the drastic and frequent changes in demand. This also makes the forecasting process more tedious and difficult. The constant changes in customer preferences with the increases in demand have affected order fulfillment as most manufacturing facilities do not have the additional capacity to cope with sudden increase in orders. They require huge investment and with the shortening of product life cycle, the period to apportion return on investment has to be relatively short compared to the past experience. This affects working capital and increasing working capital is not an easy task unless the organization is wealthy. As Malaysia embarks on the aerospace industry, the dilemma for the manufacturers are similar. The high cost of raw materials in inventory and inventory holding significantly affects order fulfillment. The findings of this study differs from the normal business inventory management practices, thus offering new knowledge and learning curve in the inventory management context of the high technology industry, in particular, the aerospace. The findings indicate that inventory management or the inventory conversion period has an inverse relationship with organization’s profitability.
Metrics & impact
Citations by source
Harvested 08-09-2026Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.
Citations over time
New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.
Reads & downloads
Attention beyond citation
From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.
References
-
Cachon, G., & Fisher, M. (2000). Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information. Journal from Management Sci. 46(8), 1032-1048.
-
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2001). Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operation, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J,
-
Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. (2007). Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199–1216.
-
Dooley, F. (2015). Logistic, inventory control and supply chain management, The American Agricultural Economics Association, Choices. 20,(4), 287-291 Retrieved from : http://www.choicesmagazine.org/2005-4/supplychain/2005-4-14.htm
-
Gavirneni, S., Kapuscinski, R., & Tayur, S. (1999). Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. 45(1),16-24.
-
Harland, C., Brenchley, R., & Walker, H. (2003). Risk in supply networks, Journal of Purchasing and Supply management, 9(2), 51-62.
-
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen J. D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 241–253.
-
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management 14(1), 53–68.
-
Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Wang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain. The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43(4), 546-558.
-
Levy, D. L. (1997). Lean production in an international supply chain, Sloan management Review, Winter, 94-102.
-
Lewis, M. (2003). Cause, consequence and control: towards a theoretical and practical model of operational risk, Journal of Operational Management, 21(2), 205-224.
-
Pujawan, N. (2008). Augmenting the lot sizing order quantity when demand is probabilistic. European Journal of Operational Research. 188(3) 705–722.
-
Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. J. (2007). Strategic buyer–supplier relationships, information technology and external logistics integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(2), 2–14.
-
Sheffi, Y. (2002). Supply chain management under threat of international terrorism, International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 1-12.
-
Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.
-
Slack, N., Chambers, S., Harland, C., Harrisons, A., & Johnston, R. (1995), Operations Management, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(3). 63-64.
-
Tang, C. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics. 103(2), 451-488.
-
Wanke, P. (2011). The impact of different demand allocation rules on total stock levels. Pesquisa Operacional 30(1), 33-52.
-
Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J. (2002). Value chain flexibility: A dichotomy of capability, International Journal of Production, 40(3), 561-583.