Research Article Published 31 July 2022

Size of Public Sector in Malaysia: Premiership of Prime Ministers

How to Cite

How to Cite

Hassan, N. L., & Amran, N. A. (2022). Size of Public Sector in Malaysia: Premiership of Prime Ministers. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 12(2), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2022.12.2.3
Nor Laili Hassan
Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Noor Afza Amran
Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Full text
PDF View full text 1 MB · 24 pages XML JATS full text 65 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 54 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2022.12.2.3 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
0
No citations recorded yet
Reads
459 +1
Abstract + full text
Downloads
475 +3
PDF and XML

Article

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the size of the public sector during the premiership of three former prime ministers of Malaysia. The size of the public sector in Malaysia was measured based on total expenditure for the period 1982 - 2015. A comparison of public sector size based on the percentage of total public sector expenditure to GDP suggests that the size of the public sector was bigger during the early years of Tun Dr. Mahathir’s premiership; the percentage remained at a low level from 1994 onwards and continued during the tenure of his successors.  The trend in the size of the public sector of the three prime ministers ranges from 15% to 30%, which means that the Malaysian government's sizing practices are consistent with other countries. Taking into account the government’s operating expenditure to total expenditure, the percentage of operating expenditure increased during the premiership of Dato’ Sri Najib. The government policy in the days of Dato’ Sri Najib focused on implementing government reform programs and increasing employment, which could have led to higher operating expenditure compared to development expenditure.  Based on trends in government spending, the size of the government can be related to political or policy changes and economic conditions during the said prime ministers’ tenure.

Keywords
Public sector government size Malaysia public sector expenditure

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 459
PDF downloads 475
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 12

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2022.12.2.3
OpenAlex · W4289203595

References

References 30
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Afonso, A. & Furceri, D. (2008). EMU enlargement, stabilization and finance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(2), 169-187.
  2. Afonso, A., & Furceri, D. (2010). Government size, composition, volatility and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 517-532.
  3. Alberto, A. & Wacziarg. R. (1998). Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 305-321. Annonymous. (5 February, 2017). An Effective Civil Service Does Not Burden Government. The Star Online. Available at: https://wcoats.wordpress.com/ 2008/09/06/how-to-measure-the-size-of-government/
  4. Azhar, Z., Norhisham, M., Ahmad, Z. & Mohamed, M. (2019). Public Sector Accounting: Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context. Oxford University Press.
  5. Borcherding, T., Pommerehne, W.W. & Schneider, F. (1982). Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: The Evidence from five Countries. Zeitschrift für National Ekonomie, Supplementum, 2, 127-156.
  6. Borre, O. & Vegis, J. M. (1995). The Scope of Government. Oxford University Press: New York.
  7. Brown, C. V. & Jackson, P. M. L. (1986). Public Sector Economics (3rd Edition). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
  8. Chobanav, D. & Mladenova, A. (2009). What is the Optimum Size of Government? Working Paper 335309. Institute of Market Economics, Bulgaria.
  9. DiPeitro, W.R. & Anoruo, E. (2012). Government size, public debt and real economic growth: A panel analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(4), 410-419.
  10. Aykut Ekinci (2011). What is the optimum size of government: A suggestion, International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 3(1), 201.
  11. Economic Report (1980-2017). Ministry of Finance, Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional. Federal Constitution 1957
  12. Ghali,K.H. (1998). Public Investment and Private Capital Formation in a Vector, Error-Correction Model of Growth. Applied Economics, 30(6), 837-844.
  13. Gupta,S., Leruth, L., De Mello, L.R. & Chakravarti, S. (2003). Transition economies: How appropriate is the size and scope of government? Comparative Economic Studies, 45(40), 554-576.
  14. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R. & Holcombe, R. (1998). The Size and Functions of Government and Economic Growth. Joint Economic Committee, Washington, D.C. April.
  15. Jomo K. S. (2003), Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia. Issue 4 (October 2003). Regional Economic Integration, Retrieved from https://kyotoreview.org/issue-4/mahathirs-economic-legacy/
  16. Kahn, J. A (2017). Can We Determine the Optimal Size of Government? CATO Institute, Development Policy Briefing Paper No.7. Mid-Term Review of the Fifth Malaysian Plan 1986-1990, Malaysian Government.
  17. Ministry of Finance Malaysia, (2016). Available at: http://www. treasury.gov.my/index.php/en/economy/economic-data.html
  18. Mithani, D. M. & Khoon, G. S. (1999). Casuality between Government Expenditures and Revenues in Malaysia: A Seasonal Cointergration Test. Asean Economic Bulletin. 16(1), 68-79.
  19. McCreedy, A. (2003). Passing the mantle: A new leadership for Malaysia. Washington, D.C: Asia Program Special Report.
  20. Mutascu, M. & Milos M. C. (2009). Optimal Size of Government Spending. The case of European Union Member States”, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 1(11), 447–456.
  21. Patton, M. (2013). The Growth of Government: 1980 to 2012 Forbes. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites mikepatton/2013/01/ 24/the-growth-of-the-federal-government-1980-to-2012/
  22. Romero-Avila, D., & Strauch, R. (2008). Public finances and long-term growth in Europe: Evidence from a panel data analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 172-191.
  23. Sagua, M. (2017). An Analysis on the Size of Government in Malaysia. Retrieved on 14 February 2017 https://www.academia. edu/5140736/Govermnent_Size_-_Malaysia.
  24. Shuib, M. S. (2007). ‘Mahathiriskonomisme’: Mengekang ancaman kedaulatan negara melalui ekonomi (Mahathiriskonomisme: To protect State Sovereignty Threats through Economic). Dewan Ekonomi. August.
  25. Shuib, M. S., Keling M. F., & Ajis, M. N. (2008). The concept of Mahathiriskonomism: A significant model for economic turmoil. Paper work presented at The International Conference on International Studies (ICIS) (2008). Institute Diplomacy and Foreign Relations (IDFR), Kuala Lumpur, 4-6 Disember.
  26. Shuib, M. S., Keling M. F., & Ajis, M. N. (2009). The concept of Mahathiriskonomisme: An economic recovery model during crisis. Journal of Politic and Law, 2(1), 75-85
  27. Siti Alida, J. A. & Halimah, N. A. (2001). Penilaian Saiz Sektor Awam di Malaysia Semenjak Dasar Ekonomi Baru dan Perbandingan Dengan Beberapa Buah Negara. Sekolah Pembangunan Sosial. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  28. Statistics Sweden (2006). Public Finance in Sweden available at www. scb.sè/statistik_publikationer/OE0903_2004AO1_BR_07_ OEO6SA0602.pdf. UKEssays. (November 2018). Abdullah Badawi’s Effect on Political Economy. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/ politics/abdullah-badawis-effect-political-7674.php
  29. Yuksel, C. (2019). The Size of the Public Sector and the Armey Curve: The Case of Turkey, Critical Debates in Public Finance, Peter Lang.
  30. Yusof, Z.A., & Bhattasali, D. (2008). Economic Growth and Development in Malaysia: Policy Making and Leadership, Working Paper No.27, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank On behalf of the Commission on Growth and Development.

Most read articles by the same author(s)