Amalan Perekrutan oleh Firma di Malaysia: Satu Kajian Empirikal

Authors

  • Tang Swee Mei Fakulti Pembangunan Sosial dan Manusia Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Lim Kong Teong Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.8

Keywords:

perekrutan, pengetahuan, keberkesanan, kegunaan, kualiti

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan menyelidik amalan perekrutan semasa di Malaysia  khususnya terhadap jawatan pengurusan. la juga bertujuan untuk meneliti tahap pengetahuan personal dan tahap penggunaan teknik perekrutan. Seterusnya, kajian ini juga meninjau persepsi pengurus sumber manusia tentang keberkesanan teknik perekrutan dalam mendapatkan pekerja yang berkualiti dan yang dapat menunjukkan prestasi kerja yang tinggi. Berdasarkan kepada skor purata, hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa tahap pengetahuan personal terhadap teknik perekrutan adalah lebih tinggi berbanding dengan tahap penggunaan oleh syarikat. Hasil kajian juga mengesahkan teknik perekrutan tradisional seperti iklan surat khabar, resume dan rujukan pekerja masih popular digunakan.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, N., & Shackleton, V. (1986). Recruitment and selection: A review of developments in the 1980s. Personnel Review, 15(4), 19-25.

Bohlander, G., Snell, 8., & Sherman, A. (2001). Managin, ig human resources (12th ed.). Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

Breaugh, J. A. (1992), Recruitment; Science and practice. Boston:PWS-Kent Publishing Co..

Chew, Irene K.H., & Teo, Albert C. Y. (1991). Human resource practices in Singapore: A survey of local firms and MNCS. Asia Pacific Auman Resource Management, 29(1), 30-8,

Cook, M. (1993). Personnel selection and productivity (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley.

Deshpande, 8.P., & Golhar, D.Y. (1994), HRM practices in large and smal] manufacturing firms: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(2), 49-56.

DeWitte, K. (1989). Recruitment and advertising. In Herriot, P. (Ed.), Assessment and selection in organizations: Methods and practice for recruitment and appraisal (84-107). Chichester: John Wiley.

Farnham, D., & Pimlott, J. (1995). Understanding industrial relations (5th ed.). London: Cassells.

Heneman, H, G., & Berkley, R. A. (1999). Applicant attraction practices and outcomes among small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(1), 53-74.

Heneman, H. G., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Staffing organizations (4th ed.). IJMS 11 (SPECIAL ISSUES), 157-170 (2004) 169 Singapore: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Heraty, N., & Morley, M. (1998). In search of good fit: Policy and practice in recruitment and selection in Ireland. Journal of Management Development, 17(9), 662-685.

Hornsby, J.S., & Kuratko, D.F, (1990). Human resource management in small business: Critical issues for the 1990's. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(3), 9-18.

Jabatan Tenaga Rakyat (2002). Laporan statistik pendaftaran baru dan kekosongan baru mengikut kumpulan pekerjaan tahun 2001. Perolehan pada 21 Feb. 2002. http://www.jtr.gov.my.

Judge, T., & Ferris, G. (1992). The elusive criterion of fit in human resources staffing decisions. Human Resource Planning, 15(4), 47-66.

Kilibarda, P., & Fonda, N. (1997). Random selection. People Management, 3(24), 36-9.

McEvoy. G.M. (1984). Small business personnel practices. Jourtal of Small Business Management, 22(4), 1-8. Munauwar Mustafa, Faridahwati Mohd Shamsuddin, Hasnizam

Hassan, Mohd Shah Kassim, & Zahiruddin Ghazali (2000). Recruitment and selection practices in the manufacturing sector in Malaysia. Laporan Akhir Penyelidikan Universiti, UUM.

Terpstra, D. E. (1996). The search for effective methods. HR Focus, 16-7.

Walker, J. (1992). Human resource strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wanous, J. P. (1992). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, orientation and socialization of newcomers. MA: Addison-Wesley. 170 IIMS 11 (SPECIAL ISSUES), 157-170 (2004)

Downloads

Published

25-02-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.8 OpenAlex W6998545017

Most read articles by the same author(s)