Hubungan antara Kerja Berpasukan dengan Kepuasan Kerja Ketua Panitia Sekolah Menengah

Authors

  • Arsaythamby Veloo Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden UUM College of Arts and Sciences, Malaysia
  • Kiew Hwee Bin Pusat Pengajian Pendidikan dan Bahasa Moden UUM College of Arts and Sciences, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2012.19.1.9

Keywords:

Kepuasan kerja, kerja berpasukan, jantina, umur, pengalaman kerja

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti perbezaan kepuasan kerja ketua panitia dalam kerja berpasukan berdasarkan jantina, umur dan pengalaman kerja. Di samping itu kajian ini juga bertujuan mengenal pasti penyumbang utama dan hubungan antara lima faktor kerja berpasukan iaitu tindakan pemimpin, struktur perwatakan pasukan, struktur perwatakan individu dan hubungan interpersonal dengan kepuasan kerja ketua panitia. Subjek kajian ini terdiri daripada kesemua 141 ketua panitia daripada sembilan buah sekolah menengah kebangsaan harian di daerah Kuala Krai, Kelantan. Alat ukur kerja berpasukan telah diubah suai daripada kajian Karakus dan Töremen (2008) manakala alat ukur kepuasan kerja telah diubah suai daripada Model Teori Dua Faktor Herzberg (1966) dalam Tay (2007). Kerja berpasukan diukur daripada empat dimensi iaitu tindakan pemimpin (8 item), struktur perwatakan pasukan (7 item), struktur perwatakan individu (8 item) dan hubungan interpersonal (8 item) manakala kepuasan kerja diukur menggunakan 20 item. Dapatan kajian ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan program Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) versi 16.0. Kajian ini menggunakan ujian-t, ANOVA satu hala, Kolerasi Pearson dan regrasi berganda untuk menguji hipotesis kajian. Dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa wujud perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina dan umur dengan kepuasan kerja tetapi tiada perbezaan yang signifikan dengan pengalaman kerja. Keputusan kajian ini menunjukkan terdapat hubungan antara tindakan pemimpin, struktur perwatakan pasukan, struktur perwatakan individu dan hubungan interpersonal. Kajian ini juga menunjukkan tindakan pemimpin, struktur perwatakan pasukan dan hubungan interpersonal menjadi peramal kepada kepuasan kerja. Hasil kajian mencadangkan pihak sekolah, Jabatan Pendidikan Daerah serta Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri yang terlibat dengan program latihan dan pembangunan harus menitikberatkan aspek peningkatan pengetahuan dan kemahiran kerja berpasukan khususnya kepada ketua-ketua panitia dalam aspek kemanusiaan, perancangan dan penyelarasan tugas.
 
Kata kunci: Kepuasan kerja, kerja berpasukan, jantina, umur, pengalaman kerja.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back translation for cross cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–116.

Buletin NUTP. (2008, Februari). The rights and responsilities of teachers.

Bull, I. H. F. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and organization commitment amongst high school teachers in disadvantaged areas in the Western Cape (Tesis Master yang tidak diterbitkan).

Capozzoli, T. K. (1995). Resolving conflict within team. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18 (7), 28–31. http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Cheung, C. K., & Sherling, S. A. (1999). Job Satisfaction, work value and sex differences in Taiwan’s organization. The Journal of Psychology, 133 (5), 563–575.

Conley, S., Fauske, J., & Pounder, D. G. (2004). Teacher work group effectiveness, Educational Administration Quarterly, 40 (5), 663–703.

Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organization Behavior, 22, 537–550.

Hadyn, I., & McDonnel, B. (1996). Effective performance management-The teamwork approach consider. Managing Service Quality, 6 (6), 38–42.

Herzberg, F. (1966). How do you motivate employers? Harvard Business Review, 1(46).

Hussein Mahmood (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Katszenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of team: Creating the high performance organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Busines School Press.

Karakus, M., & Töreme, F. (2008). How our schools can be more synergic: Determing the obstacles of teamwork. Journal of Team Performance Management, 14 (5/6), 233–47.

Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. (2000). Leadership: Theory, application, skill. South-Western College Publishing.

Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers’ job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 39–47.

Mertler, G. A. (2002). Job satisfaction and perception of motivation among middle and high school teacher. American Secondary Education, 31(1), 27–43.

Miles, S. J., & Mangold, G. (2002). The impact of team leader performance on team member satisfaction: The subordinate’s perspective. An International Journal of Team Performance Management, 8 (5/6), 113–121. IJMS 19 (1), 175–191 (2012)

Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2007). Intervensi pembangunan organisasi pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Hadyn, I., & McDonnel, B. (1996). Effective performance management: The teamwork approach consider. Managing Service Quality, 6(6), 38–42.

Hee, S. P., & Park, M. (2008). Multilevel effects of conflict management preferences on satisfaction with group process. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19 (1), 30–46.

Pelita Brunei. (2008, November, 5). Kumpulan kerja cemerlang mengetengahkan budaya kerja berpasukan. http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Perrachione, B. A., Rosser, V. J., & Petersen, G. J. (2008). Why do they stay? Elementary teachers’ perceptions of job satisfaction and retention. The Professional Educator, 32(2).

Pineda, R. P., & Lerner, L. D. (2006). Goal attainment, satisfaction and learning from teamwork. Journal of Team Performance Management, 12 (56), 82–191.

Pounder, D. G. (1999). Teacher team: exploring job characteristics and work-related outcomes of work group enhancement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 317–348.

Ruiz Ulloa, B. C., & Adams, S. G. (2004). Attitude towark teamwork and effective learning. Team Performance Management, 10 (7/8), 145–51.

Soon Hee Kim. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 231-241.

Somech, A. (2008). Managing conflict in school teams: The impact of task and good interdependence on conflict management and team effectiveness. Educational Administration Quartely, 44(3), 359-390.

Steven M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25(2), 207–228.

Tay, S. B. (2007). Kaitan antara kepimpinan kerja berpasukan pengetua dengan kepuasan kerja ketua panitia di daerah Keluang. Univesiti Teknologi Malaysia (Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan).

Zaidatol Akmaliah, L. P. (1999). Pentadbiran pendidikan. Shah Alam: Fajar Bakti.

Zahavy, A. D., & Somech, A. (2001). Team heterogeneity and its relationship with team support and team effectiveness. Journal o of Education Administration, 40 (1), 44–66.

Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2006). Sources of teacher job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Cyprus. Compare, 36(2), 229–247.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2012

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2012): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 19, No. 1 June 2012

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2012.19.1.9

Most read articles by the same author(s)