Atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi dengan Kepuasan Kerja dalam Kalangan Guru

Authors

  • Arsaythamby Veloo College of Arts and Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Wirda Hasmin Zolkepli College of Arts and Sciences Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.10

Keywords:

Keadilan sistem, kejelasan sistem, kawalan kriteria penilaian, penyertaan guru dalam sistem penilaian, pengendalian sistem penilaian, kredibiliti penilai, kepuasan kerja, atribut sistem penilaian prestasi

Abstract

Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengenal pasti atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah kebangsaan di negeri Perlis. Kajian ini meninjau hubungan antara pemboleh ubah atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi dengan kepuasan kerja guru. Sejumlah 107 orang guru telah dipilih sebagai responden kajian. Atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi (ASPP) terdiri daripada enam pemboleh ubah tidak bersandar iaitu keadilan sistem, kejelasan sistem, kawalan kriteria penilaian, penyertaan guru dalam sistem penilaian, pengendalian sistem penilaian dan kredibiliti penilai dengan pemboleh ubah bersandar iaitu kepuasan kerja guru. Instrumen kajian ini mengandungi sejumlah 26 item yang diadaptasi daripada instrument Kelly, Ang, Chong dan Hu (2008). Data yang dikumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan SPSS versi 12.0 melalui ujian korelasi Pearson. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan hubungan positif yang signifi kan antara atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi iaitu keadilan sistem, kejelasan sistem, kawalan criteria penilaian, pengendalian sistem penilaian dan kredibiliti penilai dengan kepuasan kerja guru-guru kebangsaan di negeri Perlis. Namun, terdapat satu pemboleh ubah yang tidak mempunyai hubungan yang signifi kan dengan kepuasan kerja guru iaitu penyertaan guru-guru dalam sistem penilaian prestasi. Dapatan kajian ini memberikan input kepada pihak pentadbir sekolah kebangsaan tentang tingkah laku guru-guru terhadap penilaian prestasi dan bagaimana hubungan pelbagai atribut Sistem Penilaian Prestasi dengan kepuasan kerja. Setiap individu mengharapkan Sistem Penilaian Prestasi yang dilaksanakan adil dan telus. Melalui kajian ini, terbukti bahawa keadilan merupakan perkara yang perlu dititikberatkan dalam pengendalian Sistem Penilaian Prestasi.
 
Kata kunci: Keadilan sistem, kejelasan sistem, kawalan kriteria penilaian, penyertaan guru dalam sistem penilaian, pengendalian sistem penilaian, kredibiliti penilai, kepuasan kerja, atribut sistem penilaian prestasi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdull Sukor Shaari. (2003). Hubungan motivasi, keupayaan mengajar dan komitmen kerja dengan prestasi kerja guru bahasa Melayu sekolah menengah (Disertasi Ph.D) Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid. (1992). Perkhidmatan awam Malaysia: Satu peralihan paradigma (perubahan dan kemajuan dalam perkhidmatan awam Malaysia (1993). Kuala Lumpur: Kerajaan Malaysia.

Behery, M. H., & Paton, R. A. (2008). Performance appraisal-cultural fit: Organizational outcomes within the UAE. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 1(1), 34–49.

Boice, D. F., & Kleiner, B. H. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. Work Study, 46(6), 197–201.

Brown, A. (2005). Implementing performance management in England’s primary school. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(6), 468–481. IJMS 18 (1), 197–216 (2011) http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Cook, J., & Crossman, A. (2004). Satisfaction with performance systems: A study of role perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(5), 526–541.

Creelman, J. (1995). Pay and performance drive human resource agendas. Management Development Review, 8(3), 6–9.

Fletcher, C. D., & William, S. R. (1986). Performance appraisal and career development. London: Century Hutchinson.

Gratton, R. (2004). Teacher appraisal: A lesson on confusion over purpose. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(5), 292–296.

Hertzberg, F. (1959). In Mumtaz Begam Hj. Abdul Kadir, Norasiken

Bakar & Norhayatee Ismail. (2002). Kualiti dalam pengurusan sumber manusia. Selangor: Fajar Bakti.

Jawahar, I. M. (2006). Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Labour Research, 27, 213–236.

Kamarudin Mohd. Hashim. (1995). Kepuasan kerja dalam kalangan guru penolong kanan hal ehwal murid di sekolah-sekolah menengah negeri Perak. (Thesis Master). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Kelly, K. O., Ang, S. Y. A., Chong, W. L., & Hu, W. S. (2008). Teacher appraisal and its outcomes in Singapore primary school. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 39–54.

Koustelios, A., Theodorakis, N., & Goulimaris, D. (2004). Role ambiguity, role conflict and job satisfaction among physical education teacher in Greece. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18(2), 87–92.

Kuvaas, B. (2006). Different relationships between perceptions of developmental performance appraisal and work performance. Personnel Review, 36(3), 378–397.

Larson, J. R. (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 42–76.

Latham, G. P., & Wexley, K. N. (1994). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Lim, T. S. (1995). Kepuasan kerja dalam kalangan guru SRJK (C) di Kelantan (Kertas Projek Sarjana Sains Pengurusan Pendidikan). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Longenecker, C. O. (1997). Why managerial performance appraisals are ineffective: Causes and lessons. Career Development International, 2(5), 212–218.

Maslow. (1954). In Mumtaz Begam Hj. Abdul Kadir, Norasiken Bakar & Norhayatee Ismail. (2002). Kualiti dalam pengurusan sumber manusia. Selangor: Fajar Bakti.

Massithah Khalib. (2009). Persepsi guru terhadap kepuasan kerja dan factor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan kerja guru di sekolah IJMS 18 (1), 197–216 (2011) http://ijms.uum.edu.my menengah (Kertas Projek Sarjana Sains Pengurusan Pendidikan). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2003). Organizational behavior: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Nor Hartini Saari. (2004). Hubungan kepuasan kerja dan komitmen organissasi: Kajian kes di Jabatan Pelajaran Negeri Kedah (Kertas Kerja Sarjana Sains Pengurusan Pendidikan). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Omar Osman. (2007, Disember 10). Cuepacs wujud tanda aras kerja. Berita Harian. Retrieved July 11, 2008.

Patterson, T. F. (1987). Refining performance appraisal. Journal of Extension, 25(4), Retrieved from http://www.joe.org. Pelaksanaan Sistem Saraan Malaysia (SSM) bagi anggota Perkhidmatan Awam Persekutuan. (Pekeliling Perkhidmatan Bilangan 4 tahun 2002). Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam.

Perillo, S. (2006). Practice enhancement: Optimising teaching performance in schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(5), 365–379.

Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood IL: Irwin.

Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and Applications (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behaviour (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Rusli Ahmad. (2004). Performance appraisal decision in Malaysian public service. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(1), 48–64.

Schneier, C. E., & Beatty, R. W. (1979). Integrating behaviorally based effectiveness-based methods. The Personnel Administrator, 24, 66.

Sukarmain. (2010). Pengaruh tingkah laku kepimpinan pengajaran guru besar atas keafiatan sekolah, komitmen organisasi, efikasi dan kepuasan guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah di Surakarta (Tesis Ph.D). Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Türk, K., & Roolaht, T. (2006). A comparison of the appraisal systems and appraisal-compensation interlinks used by Estonian public and private universities. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series: University of Tartu.

Wexley, K. N., & Yukl, G. A. (1984). Organizational behavior and personnel psychology. America: Richard D. Irwin.

Wilson, J. P., & Western, S. (2000). Performance appraisal: An obstacle to training and development. Career Development International, 6(2), 93–99. IJMS 18 (1), 197–216 (2011) http://ijms.uum.edu.my

Wilson, J. P., & Western, S. (2000). Performance appraisal: An obstacle to training and development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(7), 384–390.

Woods, P. (2003). Performance management of Australian and Singaporean expatriates.International Journal of Manpower, 25(5), 517–534.

Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. IJMS 18 (1), 197–216 (2011)

Downloads

Published

30-06-2011

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 18, No.1 June 2011

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.10

Most read articles by the same author(s)