Industry Perspective on Journalism Education Curriculum in Malaysia

Authors

  • Norhafezah Yusof School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Awan Ismail School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Rizalawati Ismail Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge & Human Sciences International Islamic University, Malaysia
  • Norizah Aripin School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Azahar Kassim School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Sobhi Ishak School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.6

Keywords:

Communication and media, curriculum, industry, graduates, model

Abstract

Purpose -This study investigated media and communication practitioners’ perspectives on the journalism education curriculum in Malaysia. Curriculum plays an important role in providing quality education for students. Journalism is a dynamic field that integrates industrial experience and fundamental knowledge in the field from higher educational institutions. Scholars in the field are divided on the issue of whether it is important for academia to consider input from industrial players in shaping the curriculum on journalism education in higher institutions of learning.
 
Methodology - Drawing from the researchers’ experiences and guidelines from the Malaysian Qualifications Agency, the Taba Model was adapted as the theoretical framework for the study. The study used a semi-structured interview method. Fifteen experts were interviewed. They have served more than 10 years in the media industry and have held various executive positions. The interview protocol was developed based on the literature review and guidelines from the curriculum review of Communication and Media Studies. The interviews were conducted at the offices or homes of interviewees. Each interview ranged from 1 to 2 hours. The data was analysed using thematic analysis.
 
Findings  -  The findings revealed four main themes, namely 1) Strong general knowledge requirement, 2) the right skills matter, 3) Interest in the field – ability to adapt and learn, and 4) Specialised knowledge. The analysis of interviews indicated that curriculum needs to be revised based on academic convention and industrial needs.
 
Significance - Thus, these findings lend further support to the clarion call for industry and academia to collaborate extensively in nurturing high quality graduates in journalism.

References

Anderson, C.W. (2017). Venture labor, media work, and the communicative construction of economic value: Agendas for the field and critical commentary. International Journal of Communication, Forum, 2033-2036.

Aripin, N., Ismail, A., Yusof, N., & Ismail, R. (2015). Shaping the journalism education studies in Malaysia: The effects from the study of ethnicity. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 31(2), 323-340.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.

Callaghan, R. & McManus, J. (2010). Building the perfect graduate: What news employers want in new hires. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 20(1), 9-21. http://ro.uow.edu.au/apme/vol1/ iss20/2/

Chan, S-J., Lee, M.N.N.., & Yang, R. (2017). The hybrid university in East Asia: searching for the new paradigm. Studies in Higher Education, 10 (1), 1803-1808.

Cullen, T., Tanner, S. J.., O’Donnell, M. and Green, K. (2014). Industry needs and tertiary journalism education: Views from news editors’, Transformative, innovative and engaging. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Teaching Learning Forum, University of Western Australia, Australia, pp. 1-11.

Daniels, S. (2012, November 06). Young journalists today: Journalism students’ perceptions of the ever-evolving industry. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc115063/ m1/1/

Desai, M. K. (2017). Journalism education in India. In R. S. Goodman & E.Steyn (Eds.),Global journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges & innovations (pp. 113-136). University of Texas at Austin: Knight Centre for Journalism in Americas.

English, P., Fynes-Clinton, J., & Barnes, R. (2016). Roles, routines, and responsibilities: The 3Rs of educating journalists for local government reporting. Australian Journalism Review, 38(2), 73-84.

Foote, J. (2017). Journalism education’s first century: Markers of progress. In R.S. Goodman, & E. Steyn (Eds.), Global journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges & innovations (pp. 429-448). University of Texas at Austin: Knight Centre for Journalism in Americas.

Frost, C. (2017). Squeezed between the newsroom and classroom. In R. S.Goodman & E. Steyn (Eds.), Global journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges & innovations (pp. 199-218). University of Texas at Austin: Knight Centre for Journalism in Americas.

Gapasin, A.R., Mirandilla, K.M., Pascual, M.R. S.S., & Sanqui, D.C. V. (2008). Journalism education in the Phillipines. In Muppidi, S. R., & Manvi, P.(Eds), Media Asia: Journalism education in Asia (pp. 101-109). Singapore: AMIC.

Gilmor, D. (2016). Towards a new model for journalism education. Journalism Practice, 7, 815-819.

Han, G. (2017). Journalism education in China: Serving the two masters. In R. S.Goodman & E. Steyn (Eds.), Global journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges & innovations, 65-90. University of Texas at Austin: Knight Centre for Journalism in Americas.

Hugo, d. B. (2003). Skills are not enough: The case for journalism as an academic discipline. Journalism, 4 (1), 95-112.

Ismail, A., Ismail, R., Yusof, N., & Aripin, N. (2015). Journalism education in Malaysia: Dancing with UNESCO’s model curricula. International Journal of Science Commerce and Humanities, 3 (3), 1-10.

Knight, P. & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University.

Lia, W. (2008). Journalism education in Hong Kong. In Muppidi, S. R., & Manvi, P. (Eds.), Media Asia: Journalism education in Asia (pp. 60-66). Singapore: AMIC.

Luan, N. W., & Hoon, L.L. (2008). Journalism education in Malaysia. In Muppidi,S. R., & Manvi, P. (Eds.), Media Asia: Journalism education in Asia (pp. 84-100). Singapore: AMIC.

Muppidi, S.R. (2008). Journalism education in India. In Muppidi, S. R., & Manvi, P. (Eds), Media Asia: Journalism Education in Asia, (pp. 67-83).Singapore: AMIC.

Muppidi, S. R., & Manvi, P. (Eds). (2008) Media Asia: Journalism education in Asia, 101-109, Singapore: AMIC.

Merican, A. M. (2017). Sustainability journalism as discourse among civilizations: Concept and dialogue. Katha, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 26-40, aug. 2017. ISSN 1823-2159. Retrieved from http://ajba.um.edu.my/index.php/KATHA/article/view/5814

Nankervis, K. (2011). Pushing the right buttons? Training television journalists in the digital age. Australian Journalism Review, 33(1), 119-130.

Nguyen, A. (2008). Journalism education in Vietnam. In Muppidi, S. R., & Manvi, P.(Eds). (2008), Media Asia: Journalism education in Asia, 101-130,Singapore: AMIC.

Oliva, P. F., & Gordon, W. II. (2013). Developing the curriculum. Boston: Pearson.

Olusegun, O. (2015). Journalism trainers and newspapers editors agree on internship as a weak link in journalism training in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5 (4), 104-111.

Pavlik, J. V. (2012). Reforming Iraqi journalism and mass communication higher education: Adapting the UNESCO model curricula for journalism education to Iraqi higher education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67(3), 268-285.

Ricketson, M. (2001). All things to everyone: Expectations of tertiary journalism education. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 10, 94-99.

Ryfe, D., & Messing, D. (2013). Blueprint for change: From the teaching hospital to the entrepreneurial model of journalism education. Retrieved from https://www. academia.edu/3412374/Blueprint_for_Change_From_the_ Teaching _Hospital_to_the_Entrepreneurial_Model_of_ Journalism_Education

Tanner, S. J., O’ Donnell, M., Cullen. T., & Green, K. (2013). Graduate qualities and journalism renewal: Balancing tertiary expectations and industry needs in a changing environment. University of Wollongong, Research Online. Retrieved from: http://docplayer.net/18539970-Graduate-qualities- and-journalism-curriculum-renewal-balancing-tertiary-expectations-and-industry-needs-in-a-changing-environment.html#show_full_text

Temple, M. (2009). The future of journalism education in the United Kingdom: a personal view from the academy. MediAnali, 3 (5), 241-258.

Webb, A., & Moallem, M. (2016). Feedback and feed-forward for promoting problem-based learning in online learning environments. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13 (2), 1-41.

Wenger, D., & Owens, L. C. (2013). An examination of job skills required by top U.S. broadcast news companies and potential impact on journalism curricula. Electronic News, 7 (1), 22-35.

Westlund, O., & Lewis, S. C. (2017). How understanding the interplay of actors, actants, and audiences can improve journalism education. In R. S. Goodman & E.Steyn (Eds.), Global journalism education in the 21st century: Challenges & innovations (pp. 409-428). University of Texas at Austin: Knight Centre for Journalism in Americas.

Wright, K. (2010). Reality without scare quotes: Developing the case for critical realism in journalism research. Journalism Studies, 12 (2), 156-171.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2018

How to Cite

Yusof, N., Ismail, A., Ismail, R., Aripin, N., Kassim, A., & Ishak, M. S. (2018). Industry Perspective on Journalism Education Curriculum in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.6

Research impact

Harvested 2026-10-17
13 citations, from Scopus — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.6 OpenAlex W2888131916 Scopus 85049809240