Assessing the Standard of Care of Doctors in Emergency Departments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.1.2Keywords:
Medical negligence, accident and emergency department, duty of care, standard of careAbstract
Working in emergency departments appears to be challenging as the doctors stationed here encounter obstacles that may not be faced by other doctors. This includes the need to attend to a high number of patients, the lack of manpower and resources, as well as the pressing situation of being in an emergency. This condition may be more apparent in public hospitals that are usually overcrowded with patients with various illnesses that require urgent treatment. Occasionally, claims of medical negligence have been filed against doctors and hospitals by patients seeking medical treatment in emergency departments. An issue, therefore, arises on the standard of care required of doctors as has been imposed by the law on working in emergency departments. The question is whether the calamitous situation that doctors in emergency departments encounter is acknowledged by the law as a possible defence against the allegation of negligence in Malaysia. From the cases analysed, it is concluded that doctors in emergency departments are expected to exercise the skill of any other reasonable competent doctor in similar circumstances. As such, doctors and hospitals should strive to provide the best medical treatments according to the situations of each case in order to avoid liability in negligence. It is hoped that the findings of this research would assist doctors working in emergency departments in discharging their daily duties according to the standards imposed by law. To fulfil its objective, this research employs legal and doctrinal methods in which the analysis and arguments have been based on the written literature, which has been mainly case laws from Malaysia and the United Kingdom, as well as textbooks and journals.
References
Abdul Ghafur bin Mohd Ibrahim v Pengarah Hospital Kepala Batas & Anor [2010] 6 MLJ, 181. Ahmad Thaqif Amzar bin Ahmad Huzairi (Claiming through his mother and legal representative, Majdah bt. Mohd Yusof) v Kuala Terengganu Specialist Hospital Sdn. Bhd. & Ors [2021] 9 MLJ, 10. Ahmad Zubir bin Zahid (suing by himself and as the administrator of the estate of Fatimah binti Samat, deceased) v Datuk Dr Zainal Abidin Abdul Hamid & Ors [2018] MLJU.
Ang Yew Meng & Anor v Dr. Sashikannan a/l Arunasalam & Ors [2011] 9 MLJ 153.
Badrul Hizar Ab. Jabar. (2019, October 26). Atasi suasana ‘daif’ jabatan kecemasan hospital kerajaan. Berita Harian. https://www.bharian.com.my/kolumnis/2019/10/621575/atasi-suasana-daif-jabatan-kecemasan-hospital-kerajaan Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1968] 1 All E.R. 1068.
Bernama. (2023, July 14). HTAR siasat kematian kanak-kanak 10 tahun. My Metro. https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2023/07/987665/htar-siasat-kematian-kanak-kanak-10-tahun. Bolam v Frien Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582. Bolitho v City & Hackney HA [1997] 4 All ER 771. Civil Law Act 1956. Dr. Hari Krishnan & Anor v Megat Noor Ishak bin Megat Ibrahim [2018] 3 MLJ 281.
Emin Bilge, M., Karasu, R., & Aysegul Kulular, M. (2019). Right to development and emotional exhaustion: The case of healthcare institutions in Turkey. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 157-182. Foo Fio Na v Dr. Soo Fook Mun & Anor [2007] 1 MLJ 593. Hasan bin Datolah v Kerajaan Malaysia [2010] 2 MLJ 646.
Herring, J. (2008). Medical law and ethics. (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Jackson, E. (2010). Medical law: Text cases and materials. (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Johari Indan. (2024, January 2). JKNS siasat remaja meninggal dunia akibat kelalaian hospital, anggap kes serius. BH Online. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2024/01/1195551/jkns-siasat-remaja-meninggal-dunia-akibat-kelalaian-hospital-anggap
Kuala Terengganu Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Anor v Ahmad Thaqif Amzar bin Ahmad Huzairi (claiming through mother and her litigation representative, Majdah bt Mohd Yusof) and other appeals [2023] 1 MLJ 281. Lim Zi Hong v Pengarah Hospital Selayang & Ors [2013] MLJU 1613.
Malaysian Medical Council. (2019). Good medical practice. https://mmc.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GMP-Final-Edited-Amended-Version.pdf Malaysian Medical Council Guideline. (n.d). Consent for treatment of patients by registered medical practitioner. Mulholland v Medway NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWCA 268 QB. Noor Azukee bin Mohd Noor lwn Md Sayuti bin Md Yunus [2021] MLJU 1748.
Nor Zamira Che Noh. (2023, July 17). Kes Dea Maisarah: 'Saya reda, tetapi kami nak rungkai kebenaran'–Bapa.BHOnline. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2023/07/1127873/kes - dea-maisarah-saya
Nur Arissa Naura Noor Afrizal & Anor v. Dr. Abirami Kunaseelan & Ors [2023] 5 CLJ 793. Official Website of Hospital Selayang. https://jknselangor.moh.gov.my/hselayang/index.php/en/ service/clinical-service/emergency-trauma)
Poole, N. (2020). Coronavirus and clinical negligence. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 25(3), 97-98. R v Bateman [1925] 19 Cr App R8. Roe v. Ministry of Health & Others [1954] 2 All E.R. 131. Rogers v Whitaker [1992] 16 BMLR 148. Shalini a/p Kanagaratnam v Pusat Perubatan Universiti Malaya (formerly known as University Hospital) & Anor [2016] 3 MLJ 742 at p. 753.
Sokol, D. (2020, April 16). Can non-specialty doctors on covid wards still be sued? The BMJ Opinion. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/04/16/daniel-sokol-can-non-specialty-doctors-on-covid-wards-still-be-sued/
Syed Jaymal Zahiid. (2023, February 6). Health minister admits scale of problem facing emergency departments at public hospitals. Malay mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/ 2023/02/06/health-minister-admits-scale-of-problem-facing-emergency-departments-at-public-hospitals/53624 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 3 BMLR 37.
Wong Choon Mei & Anor v Dr. Kuldeep Singh & Anor. [1985] 2 MLJ 373. Wood v Thurston [1951] Times, 25 May. Zulhasnimar bt Hasan Basri v Dr. Kuppu Velumani P & Ors [2017] 5 MLJ 461.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UUM Journal of Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-27Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.








