Freedom of Information in Malaysia: International Legal Instruments and Restrictions Under National Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.10Keywords:
Freedom of information, corruption, international instruments, restrictive lawsAbstract
The acceptance of Freedom of Information (FOI) as a fundamental mechanism for enhancing accountability and transparency in the public sector is widely recognized. Numerous international legal instruments (Conventions) have advocated for the establishment and enforcement of legal frameworks pertaining to the FOI. The FOI legislation serves two essential functions, namely enhancing democratic engagement and mitigating corruption within the public sphere. Despite the acceptability of FOI on the global stage, Malaysia lacks a comprehensive legal framework to address the right to access information, except for Selangor and Penang. Additionally, there are various national legislations that hinder the exercise of FOI. This article’s objective is to examine the use of the FOI concept within the framework of international legal instruments as well as the challenges posed by Malaysian national laws that impose limitations on its implementation. The objective is achieved by employing a doctrinal methodology that incorporates international legal instruments as well as Malaysia’s legislations (Constitution, Acts and Enactments) pertaining to the FOI. The findings show the restrictions under national law make it difficult to implement FOI legal regimes in Malaysia. This paper argues that implementing FOI can only be materialized through a comprehensive review of existing laws and administrative structure reform by adapting universal standards on FOI as stated under international legal instruments. This article serves as guidelines for policymakers intending to address FOI as the anti-corruption mechanism in public sectors. Moreover, recommendations are made for the implementation of FOI into Malaysia’s domestic laws.
References
Aman, A. C., & Rookard, L. W. (2019). Private government and the transparency deficit. Administrative Law Review, 71(3), 437-489.
Arnold, I. N. (2022). The history of Abraham Lincoln, and the overthrow of slavery. BoD–Books on Demand.
Azmi, K., & Zainudin, R. (2021). Money in politics: A recipe for corruption in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 593-606. Baharuddin Ahmad v. PP [2010] 7 MLJ 577.
Bakar, N. B. A., Saleh, Z., & Mohamad, M. H. S. (2011). Enhancing Malaysian public sector transparency and accountability: Lessons and issues. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 31(31), 133-145.
Berliner, D. (2014). The political origins of transparency. The Journal of Politics, 76(2), 479-491.
Burgess M. (2015). Freedom of information: A practical guide for UK journalists. Routledge. ISBN: 9787738793217.
Birkinshaw, P. (2006). Freedom of information and openness: Fundamental human rights. Admin. L. Rev., 58, 177.
Cahyani, T. D., Said, M. H. M., & Hassan, M. S. (2023). A comparison between Indonesian and Malaysian anti-corruption laws. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 275-299.
Carothers, C. (2022). Corruption control in authoritarian regimes: Lessons from East Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Communication and Multimedia Act 1998 [Act 588].
Dahlan, R., & Hamizan, A. (2018). Malaysia. In Mendelsohn, M. F. (Ed.), Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Review, 7th edition. Law Business Research, London, pp. 217-233.
Damijan, S. (2023). Corruption: A review of issues. Economic and Business Review, 25(1), 1-10. Datuk Seri Najib Razak v. Public Prosecutor [2022] 3 MLJ 656. Emergency (Essential Powers) (No.2) Ordinance 2021.
Essien, E. B. (2012). Corruption and economic development in Nigeria: A materialistic observation. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3(14), 34-48. Freedom of Information (State of Selangor) (Access of Information) Regulation 2012. Freedom of Information (State of Selangor) Enactment 2011.
Fong, L. S. (2023, September 18). Crafting the future of Malaysia’s public procurement [Forum]. The Center of Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4) and United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Government agrees in principle to enact Freedom of Information
Act, say, Anwar. (2023, September 14). The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/09/14/govt-agrees-inprinciple-to-enact-freedom-of-information-act-says-anwar#
Geissel, B. (2008). Reflections and findings on the critical citizen: Civic education–What for? European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 34-63.
Hamin, Z., Elias, Z., & Omar, H. (2012). Conceptualising corruption and its legal control. In 2012 International Conference on
Innovation Management and Technology Research (pp. 377382). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236422
Hashim, N. (2020). Government secrecy and security classifications in the context of integrity management in Malaysia. Journal of Governance and Development, 16(1), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2020.16.1.6
Hashim, W., & Mohamed, M. (2019). Combating corruption in Malaysia: An analysis of the anti-corruption Commission Act 2009 with special reference to legal enforcement body. Journal of Administrative Science, 16(2), 11-26.
Hutchinson, F. E. (2022). Corruption and democratic governance in Malaysia. Democracy in Asia, 15.
Hutchinson, T., & Nigel, D. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin L. Rev. 17, 83.
Ikhsan, M. (2014). Legal hurdles in freedom of information in Malaysia. SSRN 2470291.
Ikhsan, M. I., & Matah, L. J. (2022). Enacting freedom of Information Act in Malaysia: A cost-benefit analysis. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), e001297-e001297.
John, B. (2023, February 22). Ramakarpal: Govt has consulted stakeholders to enact Freedom of Information Act, moots formation of info commission. Malay Mail. https://www. malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/02/22/ramkarpal-govthas-consulted-stakeholders-to-enact-freedom-of-informationact-moots-formation-of-info-commission/56171
Jones, D. S. (2022). Challenges in combating corruption in Malaysia: Issues of leadership, culture and money politics. Public Administration and Policy, 25(2), 136-149.
Kapeli, N., Mohamed, N. (2015). Insight of anti-corruption initiatives in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01197-1
Lemière, S. (2018). The downfall of Malaysia’s ruling party. J. Democracy, 29, 114. Lim Kheng Kooi v Reg [1957] MLJ 199. Malaysia’s Freedom of Information Act to be formulated in stages:
Nurul Izzah Anwar. (2018, August 19). New Strait Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/freedom-of-informationact-to-be-formulated-in-stages-nurul-izzah-anwar
Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (2023). Statistik tangkapan. https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php?id=21&page_id=97 Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694]. Mat Shuhaimi bin Shafiei v Public Prosecutor [2014] 2 MLJ 145.
Moran, C. R. (2008). Never to be disclosed: Government secrecy in Britain 1945-1975 (unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Warwick.
Muhamad, N., & Gani, N. A. (2020). A decade of corruption studies in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime.
Muhammad Azman Ng. N., Ayub, Z. A., & Rahman, R. A. (2022). The legal aspect of illicit enrichment in Malaysia: Is it a crime to be rich? UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11
Moon, M. J., Lee, S., & Park, S. (2023). Citizen sourcing policy advisory systems in a turbulent Era. Policy and Society, puad017 Nik Nazmi bin Nik Ahmad v. Public Prosecutor [2014] 4 MLJ 205. Official Secret Act 1972 [Act88]. Penal Code 1936 [Act 574]. Penang Freedom of Information Enactment 2010.
Peters, A. (2023). Human rights and corruption: Problems and potential of individualising a systemic problem. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Research Paper, (2023-18). Public Prosecutor v. Dato’ Saidin bin Thamby [2012] 3 MLJ 476.
Printing, Presses and Publication Act 1984 [Act301]. R v Smith [1960] 1 All ER 256.
Refakar, M., & Cárdenas, G. C. (2023). Corruption and transactional Crime: Building up effective accountable inclusive and transparent institutions as ground for sustainable finance. In Sustainable Finance and Financial Crime (pp. 165-188). Cham: Springer International Publishing Regulations Freedom of Information Pulau Pinang (Access to Information) 2014. Rules of the Appeal Board Freedom of Information Pulau Pinang 2014.
Saidin, S. Z., & Haron, H. (2017). Voluntary disclosure of corporate integrity in the annual report of the Malaysian federal statutory bodies. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 1, 54-66.
Sebastian, T. (2023). Anti-Positivisme Ronald Dworkin: Menalar hukum sebagai moralitas. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 269-308. Security Order 2017. Sedition Act 1948 [Act 15].
Shepherd, E. (2015). Freedom of information, right to access information, open data: Who is at the table? The Round Table, 104(6), 715-726. Sivarasa Rasiah v. Badan Peguam Malaysia & Anor [2010] 3 CLJ 507. State Information Board (State of Selangor) Rules 2012.
Stewart, K. B., & Marlin, L. C. (2004). Terrorism, war, and freedom of the press: Suppression and manipulation in times of crisis. In American National Security and Civil Liberties in an Era of Terrorism (pp. 167-183). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Suzuki, A. (2007). Political institutions and opposition forces in Malaysia: The political process of the official Secret Act and The National Economic Consultative Council. Asian Transformations in Action, 7. Takong Tabari v. Government of Sarawak & 3 Ors [1995] 1 CLJ 403.
Transparency International (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021
Tushnet, M., (2016). Notes on Some Aspects of the Taxonomy of’ Generations of Rights. United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). https://www. un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Waisbord,S.(2007).Democratic journalismand “statelessness”. Political Communication, 24(2), 115-129.
Worthy, B. (2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom’s central government. Governance, 23(4), 561-582.
Worthy, B. (2017). The politics of freedom of information: How and why governments pass laws that threaten their power. In the politics of freedom of information. Manchester University Press.
Wyeth, L. (2021). United Kingdom Freedom of Information Act 2000, Local Government and Everyday Regimes of Practice. The Journal of Civic Information, 3(4), 40-70.
Yussoff, S. F. B. C., & Nordin, R. (2021). Freedom of expression in Malaysia: Compatibility with the International Human Rights Standard. Bestuur, 9(1), 34-42. Yusoff, Y. H., Asgari, A. F. M., Ramzun, I. Z., Rosli, N. N., Hairulanuar,
P. F., & Yaacob, Z. (2023). Factors preventing auditors from whistleblowing under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010: A Concept Paper.
Zakari, M. B., & Button, M. (2022). Confronting the monolith: Insider accounts of the nature and techniques of corruption in Nigeria. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 3(2), 100-108.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
