"Mama Papa Please Hear Me": The Participation of Children in Child Custody Mediation in the Syariah Courts of Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.2.1Keywords:
Sulh, mediation, Syariah court, children participation, child custody disputeAbstract
The laws in Malaysia uphold the rights of children to participate in family law proceedings, particularly in custody disputes. However, with regard to the practice of mediation (sulh) in child custody disputes, the specific legislation that highlights measures to obtain the views of children is still vague. This paper will discuss the practice of children’s participation during mediation (sulh) in child custody disputes. The study reported in this paper has also highlighted the challenges and the adequacy of legal provisions on the practice of children’s participation during mediation (sulh). The present qualitative study has adopted a library-based research method to collect information, data, and theories from selected materials, including journal articles, textbooks, statutes, and interview methods. It also discussed how children were engaged in court-directed mediation proceedings in the Syariah Court of Malaysia. It has also examined the practice of the Syariah court in accepting the voice of children in mediation regarding decision-making in child custody dispute cases. The examination focused on the relevant legislations and policies relating to children participating in mediation in the context of international legal provisions and Syariah laws. The paper further discussed the analysis of whether the rules and procedures in Malaysia are adequate to sustain children’s participation during mediation. The data were also gathered from interviews conducted with mediators or sulh officers. Finally, the study revealed that interviewing children during sulh sessions at the Syariah Court is common even though there are no clear regulations on the practice. It is suggested that a broader interpretation of the current legislation on the voice of children enables the legality of the practice of accepting children’s voices during the Majlis Sulh. Furthermore, it is recommended that a proper standard operating procedure (SOP) for obtaining children’s views during the mediation (sulh) process is also needed.
References
Abbruzzese, M. (2019). Mediation as an alternative to litigation for child custody disputes for incarcerated parents. Cardozo J. Conflict Resol, 20, 673.
Azzis, N. M. A., & Azhar, A. (2018). Pendekatan mediasi dalam tuntutan hadanah: Kajian di Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Pulau Pinang. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 3(9), 36–45.
Child-friendly justice. (n.d.). https://www.coe.int/en/web/children/ child-friendly-justice
Children’s Rights. (n.d.). https://www.coe.int/en/web/children/
Cilečková, K., Chrenková, M., & Kornel, M. (2021). Participation of children in legal proceedings for the care of minors. The Lawyer Quarterly, 11(2), 340.
Europe, T. C. of. (2011). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Council of Europe Publishing.
Fernando, M. (2009). Conversations between judges and children: An argument in favour of judicial conferences in contested children’s matters. Australian Journal of Family Law, 23(1), 48–70.
Gerdts-Andresen, T., & Hansen, H. A. (2021). How the child’s views is weighted in care order proceedings. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth. 2021.106179
Hammad Mohamad Dahalan, & Mohamad Azhan Yahaya. (2016). Perjanjian Sulh di antara pihak-pihak bertikai di Mahkamah Syariah sebagai pilihan atau persetujuan yang perlu dipatuhi?
Muzakarah Fiqh & International Fiqh Conference 2016, 254–261.
Heimer, M., Näsman, E., & Palme, J. (2018). Vulnerable children’s rights to participation, protection, and provision: The process of defining the problem in Swedish child and family welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 316–323.
Howard, D. L. (2018). Strengthening the voice of a child: Allowing children’s voices and choices to be heard in divorce mediation. Resolved: J. Alternative Disp. Resol., 7, 76.
Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia. (2013). Kajian Keberkesanan Majlis Sulh di Mahkamah Syariah Seluruh Malaysia.
Kadir, R., Mokhlis, S., & Kahar, R. (2020). Child visitation rights in practice. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.11.1.2020.6874
Kuehnle, K., Greenberg, L. R., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2004). Incorporating the principles of scientifically based child interviews into family law cases. Journal of Child Custody, 1(1), 97–114.
Liefaard, T. (2015). Child-friendly justice: protection and participation of children in the justice system. Temp. L. Rev., 88, 905.
McEwan-Strand, A., & Skivenes, M. (2020). Children’s capacities and role in matters of great significance for them: An analysis of the Norwegian county boards’ decision-making in cases about adoption from care. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(3), 632–665.
McIntosh, J. E., Wells, Y. D., Smyth, B. M., & Long, C. M. (2008). Child-focused and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of postseparation adjustment. Family Court Review, 46(1), 105–124.
Nawi, N. F., & Hashim, N. M. (2010). Child custody and maintenance decisions: A case study of selected High Court judgments in. Workshop on Marital Dissolution in Asia.
Ngatiman, S., Hashim, N. M., & Saidon, R. (2021). Pandangan kanakkanak dalam kes hadhanah di Mahkamah Syariah di Negeri Selangor. International Conference on Contemporary Islamic Studies (ICIS 2021).
Nor’asyikin Hamzah, & Abdullah, R. (2018). Hak kanak-kanak untuk didengar: amalan dalam prosiding ḥaḍānah di Mahkamah Syariah Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur: (Child rights to be heard: practice in custody Proceeding in the Shariah Court of Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur). Journal of Shariah Law Research, 3(1), 35–64.
Paquin, G. (1987). Protecting the interests of children in divorce mediation. J. Fam. L., 26, 279.
Quennerstedt, A., Robinson, C., & I’Anson, J. (2018). The UNCRC: The voice of global consensus on children’s rights? Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 36(1), 38–54. Ramizah Wan Muhammad, “Sulh (Mediation) in the Malaysian Syariah Courts,” in Mediation in Malaysia: The Law and Practice, ed. by Mohammad Naqib Ishan Jan and Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed, (Petaling Jaya: Lexis Nexis, 2010) 424. Roslina Che Soh @ Yusoff. (2014). Children’s participation in custody and access proceedings. IIUM Law Journal, 22(1), 53–73.
Ross, H. (2013). CRC general comment 14 on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration. Irish Journal of Family Law, 16(4), 110–114.
Shaukani, y I. M. ibn A. (1981). Nayl al Autar. Matba’ah al Halabi.
Skivenes, M. (2018). Barneperspektiv i fokus. Child Perspective in Focus, in Norwegian) in Steinrem, I. and Toresen, G.(Eds.), Barnas Barnevern (Children’s Child Protection, in Norwegian).
Soh, R. C. (2014). Children’s participation in custody and access proceedings. IIUM Law Journal, 22(1), 34. Soh@Yusoff, R. C. (2021). Pandangan kanak-kanak dalam penentuan hak jagaan selepas perceraian: Dari perspektif undang-undang sivil dan syariah di Malaysia. Dalam Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia: Teori, Amalan dan Pelaksanaan (pp. 239–258). Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia, Putrajaya.
Tabernacka, M. (2021). The legal situation of a child in mediation in light of the regulations of International Law. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 7(1), 88–99.
Tajuddin, K. B. A. (2021). Apakah pertimbangan mahkamah di dalam membuat keputusan hadhanah dan hak penjagaan anak? Domain Keseimbangan - Pocket Talk Bersama JKSM. Wan Azimin Wan Adnan, Ahmad Hidayat Buang & Zubaidi Sulaiman. (2022). Pemerkasaan pelaksanaan sulh dalam kes-kes hartanah melalui pemakaian arahan amalan di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 13(2), 345-371. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.14
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
