Rethinking Higher Education Services and the Complaint Handling Framework in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.1.8Keywords:
Higher education, complaint handling, dispute resolution, ombudsman, MalaysiaAbstract
In the last few decades, Malaysia has become a global hub for higher education services. Policies and programs have been put in place to improve the higher education system in the country and attract more international students. This development needs to be aligned with an effective dispute resolution framework to ensure the continuous development of the Malaysian higher education sector. The methodology employed in this paper is a doctrinal method based on the nature of the discourse. To examine the relevant higher education concepts and dispute resolution framework, research papers pertinent to the subject were analysed. In addition, relevant legislations were consulted to determine the adequacy of the existing legal framework for dispute resolution in the higher education context in Malaysia. The main objective of this paper is to examine the nature of education services and the existing dispute resolution mechanisms in the Malaysian higher education sector. The paper will explore education services as either a "public good" or a "private good" and whether students are consumers in the real sense and have consumer rights. This research establishes that although scholars have often argued as to whether or not students are consumers, in Malaysia and other Asian countries, students are perceived as customers, and therefore, the interest, welfare and satisfaction of students must always be of utmost priority. A thorough study of the existing laws reveals that there is an inadequate provision in the education laws in Malaysia, especially regarding the mechanisms of dispute resolution in its higher education institutions.
References
Azman, N., Ali, M. M., Tamuri, A. H., & Jelas, Z. M. (2005). Effective higher educational practices-A survey of student engagement. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2, 95–119. Can Malaysia achieve 250,000 foreign students by 2025? (2019, December). Free Malaysia Today.
Cemmell, J. (2002). Public vs. Private Higher Education: Public Good, Equity Access—Is Higher Education a Public Good? In First Global Forum on International Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Quality in Higher Education, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (pp. 17–18).
Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (2005). Marketing models in education: Students as customers, products, or partners. Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 1–10.
Eagle, L., & Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education.
Fares, D., & Kachkar, O. (2013). The impact of service quality, student satisfaction, and university reputation on student loyalty: A case study of international students in IIUM, Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 5(12), 584–590.
Fowlie, F. (2008). A Blueprint for the Evaluation of an Ombudsman’s Office: A Case Study of the ICANN Office of the Ombudsman. Citeseer.
Grace, G. (1989). Education: Commodity or public good? British Journal of Educational Studies, 37(3), 207–221.
Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: Reframing the debate. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(2), 132–142.
Hamid, F. S., & Nick, Y. I. P. (2019). Comparing service quality in public vs private distance education institutions: Evidence based on Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 17–34.
Jackson, J., Fleming, H., Kamvounias, P., & Varnham, S. (2010). Student Complaint Handling and Disciplinary Processes in the 21st Century Australian University. Educ. LJ, 108.
Jalali, A., & Islam, M. D. (2011). Service satisfaction: The case of a higher learning institution in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 4(1), 182–192.
Kant, I. (1992). The Conflict of the Faculties= Der Streit der Fakultaten. ERIC.
Kitchell, K. (2020). The Future of Our Past—The Repeating Cycle of Pedagogical Complaint. The Classical Outlook, 95(1), 1–8.
Kocaqi, E. (2015). The higher education a private or a public good? Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3 S1), 432.
Lai, M. M., Lau, S. H., Mohamad Yusof, N. A., & Chew, K. W. (2015). Assessing antecedents and consequences of student satisfaction in higher education: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 45–69.
Lomas, L. (2007). Are students customers? Perceptions of academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 31–44.
Malaysia, K. P. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Marginson, S. (2018). Public/private in higher education: A synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 322–337. Monash University Malaysia, University Student Ombudsman Policy. (n.d.).
Msosa, S. K. (2021). Service failure and complaints management in higher education institutions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(3), 514–521.
National Higher Education Fund Corporation Act (1997).
Obermiller, C., Fleenor, P., & Peter, R. (2005). Students as customers or products: Perceptions and preferences of faculty and students. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 27–36.
Omoola, S. O., Kazeem, B., & Firdausa, A. (2022). Impact of university resources on student complaint in Malaysian higher education institutions. In INTED2022 Proceedings (pp. 5580–5589). International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED). https://doi.org/10.21125/ inted.2022.1437
Perry, A. (2020). Unheard voices: The case for improving higher education complaint systems. Institute for College Access & Success.
Ravishankar, K., & Murthy, C. (2000). Student participation circles: An approach to learner participation in quality improvement. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 9(1), 73–85.
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348.
Rowat, D. C. (1973). Ombudsman Plan: Essays on the Worldwide Spread of an Idea. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.
Sim, H. K. C., & Idrus, R. (2003). Student satisfaction in Malaysia: Customer-focused learner support. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 69–77.
Spain, D. (1992). Creating and defending links between teaching, research, and public service. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12(1), 77–79.
Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2007). Are university students really customers? When illusion may lead to delusion for all! International Journal of Educational Management.
The Education Act 1996, Pub. L. No. 550 (1996).
Tilak, J. B. G. (2008a). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade? Prospects, 38(4), 449–466.
Tilak, J. B. G. (2008b). Transition from higher education as a public good to higher education as a private good: The saga of Indian experience. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2), 220–234.
Universities and University Colleges (Amendment) Act 1996, Pub. L. No. Act 30. Malaysia.
Wagner, K., & Fard, P.-Y. (2009). Factors influencing Malaysian students’ intention to study at a higher educational institution. E-Leader Kuala Lumpur.
Warner, T. T., & Seaman, N. L. (1990). A real-time, mesoscale numerical weather-prediction system used for research, teaching, and public service at The Pennsylvania State University. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 71(6), 792–805.
Wille, A., & Bovens, M. (2020). Watching EU watchdogs assessing the accountability powers of the European Court of auditors and the European Ombudsman. Journal of European Integration, 1–24.
Williams, J. (2016). A critical exploration of changing definitions of public good in relation to higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 619–630.
Wit, H. de., & Knight, J. (1999). Quality and internationalisation in higher education. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Yusoff, M., McLeay, F., & Woodruffe-Burton, H. (2015). Dimensions driving business student satisfaction in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 86–104.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
