Social Media and Ethical Limitations to Malaysian Judiciary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.6Keywords:
Ethical limitation, guidelines, judges, public confidence, social mediaAbstract
The use of social media is widely accepted as an important tool to spread information easily and quickly. Judges must read and share opinions towards current and latest information using social media. As such, compliance with the adoption and exchange of information through the responsible use of social media for joint discussions is expected from judges and judicial members. The public confidence in the judicial system will diminish if the judges display improper online conduct. Therefore, the objective of this article is to identify the ethical limitation of the judges’ capacity in using social media for the maintenance of judicial integrity. By summarizing and reviewing the existing relevant framework, this article proposes a persistent and reasonable guideline on the use of social media for the judiciary following the growing risks posed by social media. Furthermore, judges and judicial officers might better exercise extreme care while requesting and accepting friend requests, including social media postings to avoid the manifestation of safety. Local judicial ethics advisory opinions are needed to prepare revised guidelines following the changing social media features.
References
Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum & Teori Peradilan: Legal theory & judicialprudence. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/ books?id=NBZNDwAAQBAJ
Annese, J. M. (2009). Staten Island criminal court judge to be transferred to Manhattan after Facebook postings, sources say. Silive.com news.https://www.silive.com/news/2009/10/ criminal_court_judge_to_be_tra.html
Arundhati Katju. (2020, July 3). Live streaming of court proceedings is part of the right to access justice. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/live-streamingsupreme-court-proceedings-coronavirus-6487482/
Aymen Zaghdoudi. (2019). Online freedom of expression of judges in Tunisia. Ruleof Law Programme. MiddleEast/NorthAfrica, 30-33. https://www.kas.de/documents/265308/265357/Impartiality+of+Judge s+and+Social+Media. pdf/eb313aed-88ca-c677-4231-d84c02ee914c? version=1.0&t=1591861554477
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264.
Blackham, A., & Williams, G. (2013). Australian courts and social media. Alternative Law Journal, 38(3), 170-175.
Blitsa, D., Papathanasiou, I., & Salmanli, M. (2015). Judges & social media: Managing the risks. Themis Competition. (2015). Team Greece 3 - National School of Judges. Available at
SSRN. Competition 2015. Team Greece 3 - National School of Judges. Available at SSRN. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/315450646_Judges_Social_Media_Managing_ the_Risks
Boothe-Perry, N. A. (2014). Friends of justice: Does social media impact the public perception of the justice system? 35 Pace L. Rev. 72.
Browning, J. (2022). Judged by the (digital) company you keep: Maintaining judicial ethics in an age of likes, shares, and follows. St. Mary’s J. On Legal Malpractice & Ethics, 12, 222. https://commons.stmarytx.edu/lmej/vol12/iss2/1
Browning, J. G. (2016). The judge as digital citizen: Pros, cons and ethical limitations on judicial use of new media. Faulkner Law Review, 8(1), 131-156.
Browning, J. G. (2022). Ethical risks in judicial use of social media. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/gpsolo/publications/gp_ solo/2022/january-february/ethical-risks-judicial-use-socialmedia/ CCPIO (Conference of Court Public Information Officers) Home
Page. (2022). https://www.ccpio.org/ Commission CGPJ - General Council of the Judiciary of Spain. Opinion (Consultation 10/2018). (25.2.2019). Point IV Conclusion 2.
In Axel Casadevall, Irene Roa and Minia Rubio. (2019). The use of Social Media by Judges and how their impartiality may be affected. Themis Competition. https://www.ejtn.eu/PageFiles/17916/TEAM%20SPAIN%20TH%20 2019%20D.PDF European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). (2019). Use of Social Media by Judges Deontological Rules or Instructions/ Relevant Case-Law. Contribution by the Venice Commission Guidelines on judges’ use of social media prepared by the UNODC Global Judicial Integrity Network. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/ documents/?pdf=CDL-PI(2019)003-e
Fisher, K. R. (2019). Judicial ethics in a world of social media. Impartiality of judges and social media:Approaches, Regulations and Results. 7-13.https://www.kas.de/documents/265308/265357/Impart iality+of+Judges+and+Social+Media.pdf/eb313aed-88ca-c6774231-d84c02ee914c?version=1.0&t=1591861554477
Florida Bar News. (2018, December 15). Facebook is OK for Judges, but it is not recommended. https://www.floridabar.org/theflorida-bar-news/facebook-is-ok-for-judges-but-it-is-notrecommended/
Gibson, J. (2017). Social media and the electronic new world of judges. Revista Forumul Judecătorilor (Judiciary Forum Review), 2017(1), 26-38.
Government Gazette. (2009, July 1). Kod Etika Hakim 2009. http://www.jac.gov.my/spk/images/stories/10_akta/akta703/kod_ etika_hakim_25jun2009.pdf
Gray, C. (2016). The troubles of the social judge. NCSC’s Center of Judicial Ethics. https://law.duke.edu/sites/default/files/centers/ judicialstudies/judicature/ethics-may2-16.pdf
Hall-Coates, S. (2015). Following digital media into the courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court principle in the information age. Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, 24, 101-140. Hamilton, W. F., Hazouri, D., Jacobowitz, J. L., Sasser, M., &
Artigliere, R. (2019). Face-off on facebook: Judges and lawyers as social media friends in post-herssein world. Revista Forumul Judecatorilor (Judiciary Forum Review), 2, 58-68.
Hill, A., & Spittlehouse, C. (2003). What is critical appraisal? Evidence-Based Medicine 3(2), 1-8.
Hussein, S. M. (2014). The 3C’s: Competition, communications and convergence. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 22(1), 65-82. Inquest into death of Nora Anne at the Coroner Court, Seremban Court was lived-streamed on YouTube starting on 24 August 2020. Bernama. (2020, August 24). In Inquest into death of Nora Anne to be live-streamed–The Star. https://www.thestar. com.my/news/nation/2020/08/21/inquest-into-death-of-noraanne-to-be-live-streamed In re Terry, No. 08-234, at Inquiry (N.C. Jud. Standards Commission). (1 April 2009). https://www.nccourts.gov/assets/inlinefiles/Public-Reprimand-08-234-Terry.pdf?oRRumeb2d. LtDBNITPCVpDgKmDYYlFcC
Jahn, J. (2016). Extrajudicial use of social media by judges in Germany. Impartiality of Judges and Social Media: Approaches, Regulations and Results, 40-48.
Johnston, K., Pearson, Rodrick., & Wallace. (2013). The courts and social media: What do judges and court workers think? Judicial Officers’ Bulletin. Judicial Commission of NSW, Australia, Volume 25(6). http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/ bulletins-and-journals
Jones, S. (2011). Judges, friends, and Facebook: The ethics of prohibition. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 24(2), 281-302.
Judiciary of England and Wales. (2014). The Master of the Rolls-Lord Dyson – Criticising Judges: Fair Game or Off-limits? https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/law/ holdsworth-address/holdsworth09-10-hope.pdf
K. Oellers-Frahm. (2011). Lawmaking through advisory opinions? GLJ, 12, 1033.
Kopf, R. G. (2015). Judicial transparency and blogging judges. Litigation, 42(1), 6-8.
Kurita, M. (2017). Electronic social media: Friend or foe for judges. St. Mary’s Journal on Legal Malpractice and Ethics, 7(2), 184237. Lord Hope of Craighead. (19 February 2010). What happens when the Judge speaks out? https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/ college-artslaw/law/holdsworth-address/holdsworth09-10hope.pdf
Lord Neuberger. (2015). ‘Judge not, that ye be not judged’: Judging judicial decision-making. F A Mann Lecture 2015. https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150129.pdf
Manap, N. A., Basir, S. M., Hussein, S. M., & Rafiei, M. (2013). The influence of E-Asean in the development of ICT law in Malaysia. International Journal of Soft Computing, 8(5), 377-380.
Manning, J. (2014). Social media, definition and classes’ of. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Social Media and Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1158-1162. National Center for State Courts [online]. Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions on Social Media - Social Media and the Courts State Links. https://ncsc-search.squiz.cloud/s/search.html?collection=ncsc meta&profile=_default&query=%20Judicial%20Ethics%20 Advisory%20Opinions%20on%2 0Social%20Media
Norman H. Meyer, Jr. (2014). Social media and the courts: Innovative tools or dangerous Fad? A practical guide for court administrators’. International Journal for Court Administration, 6(1), 1-27, ISSN 2156-7964.
Office of the Chief Registrar Federal Court of Malaysia. (1999, 20 September). Kod Etika Pegawai dan Kakitangan. http://library. kehakiman.gov.my/digital/Kod%20Etika/KEPDKM.pdf Office of the Chief Registrar Federal Court of Malaysia. (13 August 2018). Garis Panduan Penggunaan Media Sosial bagi Pegawai dan Kakitangan Pejabat Ketua Pendaftar Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia. Arahan Ketua Pendaftar (Integriti) Bil 1, Tahun 2018. https://intranet.kehakiman.gov. my/EAA/arahanamalan/Arahan%20Ketua%20Pendaftar%20 (Integriti)%20Bil%201%20Tahun%202018%20.pdf Office of the Chief Registrar Federal Court of Malaysia Palace of
Justice Putrajaya. (2020, May 11). Press Release: The Judiciary’s standard operating procedures (SOP) during the Covid-19 pandemic. https://www.kehakiman.gov.my/ sites/default/files/2020-05/ENGLISH%20% 2 0 COURT%20SOP%20STARTING%2013%20MAY%202020. pdf
Ortiz. (2021, August 7). Reprimand of judges for social media misconduct warrants updated guidelines, experts say. U. S. News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/reprimandjudges-socialmedia-misconduct-warrants-updatedguidelines-experts-say-n1273179
Outlook India. (2022). ‘Social media needs to be regulated’: SC Judge who heard Nupur Sharma Plea slams personal attacks. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/-digital-and-socialmedia-needs-to-be-mandatorily-regulated-sc-judge-whoheard-nupur-sharma-s-plea-news-206542 Özkent Y. (2022). Social media usage to share information in communication journals: An analysis of socialmedia activity and article citations. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0263725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263725
Prof Datuk Seri Dr Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed. (2020, August 26). Transparency in live-streaming of court proceedings. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2020/08/26/ transparency-in-live-streaming-of-court-proceedings Safiyat Naseem. (19.8.2021). To post or not to post: Judges’ social media predicament. Columbia Journal of Transational Law. https://www.jtl.columbia.edu/bulletin-blog/to-post-or-not-topost-judges-social-media-predicament
Singh, S. (2016). Friend request denied: Judicial ethics and social media. Journal of Law, Technology and the Internet, 7(1), 153-174.
Somers, M. M. (2019). The impartiality principle and judges online: Too dangerous to speak, too dangerous not to? Rule of Law Programme Middle East/North Africa, 14-18. https://www.kas. de/documents/265308/265357/Impartiality+of+Judges+and+S ocial+Media.p df/eb313aed-88ca-c677-4231-d84c02ee914 c?version=1.0&t=1591861554477
Spahn, T. (2011). The rise of Facebook creates ethics issues for lawyers and judges. Experience, 21(3), 35-36.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1999). Realistic socio-legal theory: Pragmatism and a social theory of law. Oxford Socia-Legal Studies Socio-LegalStudies.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780198298250.001.0001
Mayr, T. F., & Mayr-Singer, J. (2016). Keep the wheels spinning: The contributions of advisory opinions of the International Court of Justice to the development of International Law. ZaöRV, 7(6), 425-449.
The Chief Registrar of the Federal Court of Malaysia. (2019). Judicial Officers’ Code of Ethics 2019. http://www.kehakiman.gov.my/ sites/default/files/CodeofEthics2019_0.pdf
The Register. (2007, August 14). Las Vegas judge sacked for MySpace page. https://www.theregister.com/2007/08/14/las_vegas_ judge_sacked_for_myspace_page/
UNODC. (2018). Non-binding guidelines on the use of social media by judges. https://www.unodc.org/documents/ji/regional_ reports/launch_summary_report.pdf
UNODC. (2018). Summary Report of the Launch Event of the Global Judicial Integrity Network in Vienna. 9-10 April 2018. https://www.unodc.org/res/ji/import/international_ standards/social_media_guidelines/social_media_guidelines_ final.pdf
Ure M. (2019). Social media use in justice administration: Disintermediation, conversation and collaboration. Global Media Journal, 17(32), 172. Richard Foster. (February, 2013). Toward leadership: The emergence of contemporary court administration in Australia. International Journal of Court Administration, 5(1), 10th Issue, 10.
Wang, Y., Leon, P., Chen, X., & Komanduri, S. (2013). From Facebook regrets to Facebook privacy nudges. Ohio State Law Journal, 74(6), 1307-1334.
Yiswaree Palansamy. (2019, May 6). New CJ points at social media for negative perception on judiciary. Malaymail. https://www. malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/05/06/new-cj-points-atsocial-media-for-negative-perception-on-judiciary/1750275
Yulia Razmetaeva, Yurii Barabash & Dmytro Lukianov. (2022). The concept of human rights in the digital era: Changes and consequences for judicial practice. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 3(15), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.33327/ AJEE-18-5.3-a000327
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- Scopus 1 View →
- OpenAlex 0 View →
- Semantic Scholar 0 View →
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
