Intimate Partner Violence Within the Framework of Malaysian Laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.6Keywords:
Domestic Violence Act 1994, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, legal protection, victimsAbstract
In Malaysia, matters pertaining to domestic violence are governed by the Domestic Violence Act 1994 (DVA 1994) (Act 521). The DVA 1994 uses the term “domestic violence†rather than “intimate partner violence†(IPV). Definition of domestic violence not only describe the types of domestic violence are, it also identifies the victims of domestic violence. Those who fall under the category of domestic violence victims may seek legal protection under the DVA 1994 namely protection orders, compensation and access to a rehabilitation programme. Unlike domestic violence, the term ‘IPV’ is not defined by the DVA 1994. This may raise a question regarding the status of IPV victims on whether they are protected under the said Act. The research examines the definitions of domestic violence and IPV, how the DVA 1994 protects domestic violence victims, and to what extent legal protection is given to IPV victims. This article adopts the doctrinal legal research involving a detailed analysis of the DVA 1994, the Penal Code (Act 574), the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593) and case law. This research found that the definition of IPV within the DVA 1994 arguably cover only spouses and former spouses, leaving other unmentioned intimate relationships such as cohabitation and dating partner outside of the application of the Act. Although not covered by the DVA 1994, if individuals in such relationships are harmed by their partners, they can lodge a police report for violation of the criminal provisions of the Penal Code for legal action to be taken.
References
Ahmadabadi, Z., Najman, J. M., Williams, G. M., Clavarino, A. M., & d’Abbs, P. (2017). Gender differences in intimate partner violence in current and prior relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–23.
Attalla, S. M., & Rome, A. A. B. (2019). Effects of domestic violence on academic achievement among university students in Selangor, Malaysia. Malay, 46(46), 7.
Bernama. (2017, July 18) Welfare officers will be empowered to issue EPO, protect domestic violence victims. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/258515/ welfare-officers-will-be-empowered-issue-epo-protect-domestic-violence.
Bumiller, K. (2010). The nexus of domestic violence reform and social science: From instrument of social change to institutionalized surveillance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 173–193.
Colombini, M., Siti Hawa Ali., Watts, C., & Mayhew, S. H. (2011). One stop crisis centres: A policy analysis of the Malaysian response to intimate partner violence. Health Research Policy and Systems, 9(1), 1–8.
Devries, K. M., Mak, J. Y., Garcia-Moreno, C., Petzold, M., Child, J. C., Falder, G., & Pallitto, C. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340(6140), 1527–1528.
Erez, E. (2002). Domestic violence and the criminal justice system: An overview. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 7(1), 1–24.
Flinck, A., Paavilainen, E., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2005). Survival of intimate partner violence as experienced by women. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3), 383–393.
Hague, G., & Wilson, C. (2000). The silenced pain: Domestic violence 1945-970. Journal of Gender Studies, 9(2), 157–169.
Hamberger, L. K., & Larsen, S. E. (2015). Men’s and women’s experience of intimate partner violence: A review of ten years of comparative studies in clinical samples: Part I. Journal of Family Violence, 30(6), 699–717.
Hawcroft, C., Hughes, R., Shaheen, A., Usta, J., Elkadi, H., Dalton, T., Ginwalla, K., & Feder, G. (2019). Prevalence and health outcomes of domestic violence amongst clinical populations in Arab countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–12.
Karuppiah, B. (2017). Property division of unmarried cohabitants in Malaysia. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 21, 15–26.
Kumaralinggam Amirthalinggam. (2003). A feminist critique of domestic violence laws in Singapore and Malaysia. Working Paper Series 6, Asia Research Institute, 16.
LeBrun, A. (2015). Are we there yet-VAWA 2013: Same-sex legal acceptance? Seton Hall Legislative Journal, 39, 101. Mohd Safri Mohammed Na’aim, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, & Rohaida Nordin. (2019). Female victims of domestic violence and their rights to compensation in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1).
Obreja, L. D. (2019). Human rights law and intimate partner violence: Towards an intersectional development of due diligence obligations. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 37(1), 63–80. Parliamentary Debates of House of Representatives of Malaysia. (1994). Second Reading, 12 May, 3154–3157. Parliamentary Debates of House of Senate Debates of Malaysia. (2017). Second Reading & Third Reading, 14 August, 1–69.
Patra, P., Prakash, J., Patra, B., & Khanna, P. (2018). Intimate partner violence: Wounds are deeper. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(4), 494.
Pettinicchio, D. (2012). Current explanations for the variation in same-sex marriage policies in western countries. Comparative Sociology, 11(4), 526–557.
Randle, A. A., & Graham, C. A. (2011). A review of the evidence on the effects of intimate partner violence on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 12(2), 97.
Rollè, L., Giardina, G., Caldarera, A. M., Gerino, E., & Brustia, P. (2018). When intimate partner violence meets same sex couples: A review of same sex intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1506.
World Health Organization. (2010). Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: Taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization.
Zorza, J. (1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970–1990, 83. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 46, 54–59.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-06Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
