Understanding the Acceptance and Use of Generative AI Tools Among Malaysian Learners of Korean as a Foreign Language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2026.21.2.6Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, Korean language, UTAUT, technology adoptionAbstract
The increasing adoption of generative artificial intelligence or GenAI has transformed foreign language learning by providing learners with personalised, interactive, and adaptive learning experiences. Despite its growing use in higher education, limited empirical research has examined the factors influencing the acceptance and actual use of GenAI tools among Malaysian learners of Korean as a foreign language. This study investigates the determinants of GenAI adoption by applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected from 177 Malaysian university students enrolled in Korean language courses using a structured questionnaire. The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling with SmartPLS 4.0. The findings reveal that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence significantly influence learners' behavioural intention to use GenAI tools, while behavioural intention and facilitating conditions significantly affect actual use. The structural model demonstrated satisfactory explanatory and predictive power, confirming the suitability of the proposed research model. These findings suggest that learners are more likely to adopt GenAI tools when they perceive them as useful, easy to use, socially supported, and adequately facilitated by institutional resources. The study contributes to a better understanding of technology acceptance in AI-assisted foreign language learning and provides empirical evidence on GenAI adoption among Malaysian Korean language learners, offering valuable insights into learners' behavioural intention and actual use of AI-supported language learning technologies.
References
Aldreabi, H., Kareem, N., Dahdoul, S., Alhur, M., Alzboun, N., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2025). Determinants of Student Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(1), 15–33.
Almusharraf, A., & Bailey, D. (2025). Generative AI Use Among Saudi and Korean Language Learners in Higher Education : Examination Through a Modified TAM Framework. SAGE Open, 4(December), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387804
Bubaš, G., & Čižmešija, A. (2023). Measuring Video Conferencing System Success in Higher Education: Scale Development and Evaluation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(19), 227–254. https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/45647 Hair;, J. F.., Hult;, G. T. M.., Ringle;, C. M.., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Ismail, M. H., Saaludin, N., Nur, S., Haji, D., & Ali, M. (2024). The foreign language students ’ readiness for online learning in response to COVID-19 : A case of Malaysia. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2118
Kavak, V. I., Evis, D., & Ekinci, A. (2024). The Use of Chatgpt in Language Education. Experimental and Applied Medical Science, 5, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.46871/eams.1461578
Ke, Q., Gong, Y., & Ke, C. (2025). Bridging AI literacy and UTAUT constructs: structural equation modeling of AI adoption among Chinese university students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05775-y
Kim, A., & Su, Y. (2024). How implementing an AI chatbot impacts Korean as a foreign language learners willingness to communicate in Korean. System, 122(February).
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Su, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching : Learners ’ experiences and perceptions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(January), 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100371
Koteczki, R.., & Balassa, B. E. (2025). Exploring Generation Z ’ s Acceptance of Arti fi cial Intelligence in Higher Education : A TAM and UTAUT-Based PLS-SEM and Cluster Analysis. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1044. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081044
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence ( GenAI ) in language teaching and learning : A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6(December 2023).
Liu, N., Deng, W., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2025). Exploring the adoption of AI-enabled English learning applications among university students using extended UTAUT2 model. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 30, Issue 10). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13349-3
Ni, A., & Cheung, A. (2023). Understanding secondary students’ continuance intention to adopt AI-powered intelligent tutoring system for English learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3191–3216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11305-z
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI ( GenAI ) in higher education : An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75.
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024). Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework. Heliyon, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569
Toscano, F., Galanti, T., Giffi, V., Fiore, T. Di, Cortini, M., & Fantinelli, S. (2024). The mediating role of technostress in the relationship between social outcome expectations and teacher satisfaction: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in music education. Research in Learning Technology, 32(1063519), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v32.3086
Venkatesh, V. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Xiao, F., Zhu, S., & Wen, X. (2026). Exploring the Landscape of Generative AI (ChatGPT)-Powered Writing Instruction in English as a Foreign Language Education: A Scoping Review. ECNU Review of Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241310881
Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, K. S. X., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2024). Examining the moderating effect of motivation on technology acceptance of generative AI for English as a foreign language learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 23547–23575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12763-3
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technology and Operations Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
