Strengthening Intellectual Property Management and Commercialisation in Malaysian Government Research Institute: Experiences from the Fisheries Research Institute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2026.21.2.2Keywords:
Government Research Institute (GRI), intellectual property governance, technology transfer, public sector innovation, case study methodologyAbstract
While transitioning public research outputs into socio-economic value is a global priority, Government Research Institutes in developing economies face distinct statutory and structural constraints compared to autonomous universities. This study investigates the institutional governance pathways executed by the Fisheries Research Institute of the Department of Fisheries Malaysia, to systematically formalise its intellectual property and commercialisation frameworks. Employing a qualitative single-case study method across four operational stages, ranging from boundary setting to systemic lesson extraction, this study data-triangulated procedural records, financial registries, and system milestones spanning 2006 to 2026. The resulting thematic synthesis maps a comprehensive six-layer strategic framework tracking FRI's evolution from an internal administrative foundation to external capability sourcing and downstream value realisation. The findings reveal that successful public sector technology transfer cannot manifest via ad-hoc actions; rather, it requires a chronological transition across interconnected internal and external governance layers. Ultimately, this study formalises a repeatable operational model, providing actionable policy insights and a transferable framework for public sector line agencies in developing nations to manage and commercialise R&D outputs effectively.
References
Baharudin, K., & Mohd Farid, S. (2019). A case study analysis of Typhidot: An example of market-oriented R&D commercialization in Malaysia. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p75
Catibog, N. A. (2016). Challenges faced by government research institutions and public universities in the commercialization of agricultural innovation in the Philippines. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform. https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/1136
Department of Fisheries. (2015). Method for semen cryopreservation and in vitro fertilization of Tor sp. (MY Patent No. MY-189637-A). Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia.
Fisheries Research Institute. (2022). Annual report 2021. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-laporan-tahunan/
Fisheries Research Institute. (2023). Annual report 2022. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-laporan-tahunan/
Fisheries Research Institute. (2024). Annual report 2023. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-laporan-tahunan/
Fisheries Research Institute. (2025a). About us. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://www.fri.gov.my/about-us
Fisheries Research Institute. (2025b). Annual report 2024. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-laporan-tahunan/
Fisheries Research Institute. (2025c). Innovation and IP list. Department of Fisheries Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/
Hailu, A. T. (2024). The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: Implementation of triple helix model relations. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00370-y
Liyana, R., & Wan Norhana, M. N. (2024). An overview on the intellectual properties of the Fisheries Research Institute, Department of Fisheries, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Invention and Innovation, 3(6), 46–59. https://digit360.com.my/mjii/index.php/home/article/view/101/91
Martínez-Ardila, H., Castro-Rodríguez, Á., & Camacho-Pico, J. (2023). Examining the impact of university–industry collaborations on spin-off creation: Evidence from joint patents. Heliyon, 9(9), e19533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19533
Mashoto, K. (2022). Review and assessment of intellectual property policy implementation in Tanzanian universities and research institutions of health and sciences. East African Health Research Journal, 6(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v6i1.678
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia. (2009). Intellectual Property Commercialisation Policy for Research & Development (R&D) Projects funded by the Government of Malaysia (June 2009). Government of Malaysia. https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/storage/2024/07/Intellectual-Property-Commercialization-Policy-June-2009.pdf
Ministry of Science and Technology (MOSTI). (2025). TechMart. https://krste.my/v2/module/techmart
Mustafa, F. N., Salahuddin, N. M. S., & Abu Dardak, R. (2021). Commercialization of public funded agrobased technologies to SMEs in Malaysia: The roles of government research institutions and private firms. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform. https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/2940
National Economic Advisory Council. (2010). The new economic model for Malaysia: Part 1. Prime Minister’s Office, Malaysia. http://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/nEM_Report_I.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Boosting Malaysia’s national intellectual property system for innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239227-en
Wan Norhana, M. N. (2022). Harta Intelek Institut Penyelidikan Perikanan [Flipbook]. Jabatan Perikanan Malaysia. https://fri.dof.gov.my/penerbitan-buku-dan-manual/#flipbook-df_864/1/
Wan Norhana, M. N., Liyana, R., & Kua, B. C. (2025). A case study on commercialization of agro-based R&D technology in Malaysia: Break and Protect 2, a marine leech trap. International Journal of Innovation and Business Studies, 20(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijibs.v20.173
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Harnessing public research for innovation in the 21st century: Impacts and policy challenges. WIPO.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Models of intellectual property governance and administration. WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.49741
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technology and Operations Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
