Independent National Electoral Commission and Campaign Financing Monitoring in Nigeria: The 2015 General Elections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2017.13.2Keywords:
INEC, political party, election, campaign, political financing, regulationsAbstract
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is the electoral umpire responsible for the conduct of general elections in Nigeria and other related electoral activities since the resurgence of democratic rule in 1999. One of these important electoral activities carried out by INEC is campaign monitoring and political party financing activities as provided in the Nigerian Constitution and the 2010 Electoral Act. This paper examined the role of INEC in monitoring candidates and parties’ expenditure during the 2015 General Elections. The major problem was the way parties and candidates violated the regulations while INEC as the monitoring body was watchful without any concrete action. The paper used the qualitative method of data collection and analysis where the researchers went to the field and consulted informants in the affected agencies and individuals through interviews and Focus Group Discussions. The data obtained from the field was analysed using tables and other techniques of qualitative data analysis. The paper concludes that, politicians and their political parties spent above the campaign spending limits as provided by law in the 2015 General Elections and the electoral body (INEC) did not monitor properly the campaign spending due to lack of political will from policy-makers and loopholes in the law that empowered them to monitor the spending. The research recommends that for proper and effective campaign financing monitoring in future elections, INEC should be mandated to monitor all politicians and their activities during and after elections, the anti-graft agency (EFCC) should be involved in screening candidates while the Code of Conduct Bureau should be reinforced in watching public servants’ assets.
References
Abdullahi, S.A. (2015). Youth, political parties and electoral violence in Nigeria. In Mohammed, H. (Ed.). The patterns and dynamics of party politics in Nigeria’s fourth republic. Kano: Hallmark Publishing Nigeria LTD.
Ahar, U.C. (2015). Historical dialectics of 2015 presidential election: Implication for sustainable democracy in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal. 11(25), 372-381.
Almond, G.A., & Coleman, J.S. (1960). The politics of the developing areas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Ayanda, A, A., & Odunayo, B.J. (2015). Comparative study of 2011 and 2015 presidential elections in Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Social Sciences: Political Science,15(7), 2-7.
Biezen, I.V. (2003). Financing political parties and election campaigns guidelines. Germany: Council of Europe Publishing.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Pearson Education.
Braun, C., & Clarke, P. (2013). Qualitative research method for social science. New Delhi: Pearson Education Inc.
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative & mixed method approaches. California: Sage Publication.
Doublet, M.Y.M. (2010). Fighting corruption: Political funding. GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round.
Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labour in society. New York: NY Free Press.
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission 2017. Electoral Act 2010.
Human Rights Watch. (2007). General Elections Innocent, E. O., & Nkechi, A. (Political financing in Africa: A comparative study for Kenya and Nigeria: Proposal for reform. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER 5(27), 12-26.
International Republic Institute. (2015). Nigeria National Elections (March 28).
Kura, B.Y. (2014). Clientale democracy: Political party funding and candidate selection in Nigeria. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 8(5), 124137.
Merton, R.K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Mohammed, H., & Aluigba, M.T. (2013). Election rigging and political instability in Nigeria: The case of 2007 General Elections. Journal of Democratic Studies Mambayya House, 3(4), 23-32. Nigeria’s fourth republic. European Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 4(1), 132-142. Nigerian 1999 Constitution. Nigerian Legislation 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.commonlii.org/ng/legis/num_act/ ineced571
Olorunmola, A. (2016). Cost of politics in Nigeria. Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
Omilusi, M. (2016). An assessment of political parties and democratic consolidation in Nigeria fourth Republic. European Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 4 (1), 132-142.
Onah, E.I. (2014). Nigeria: A country profile. Journal of International Studies, 10,151-162.
Onah, E.I. (2015). Boko Haram insurgency and the 2015 General Elections in Nigeria. Journal of International Studies. 11, 15-28.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press Publishers.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business. India: John Wiley & Sons.
Sharan, M. P. (2009). Qualitative research method. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, M.G. (1966). A structural approach to comparative politics. In Easton, D. (1966) (Ed.), Varieties of political theory Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Sule, B., Azizuddin, M., Sani, M., & Mat, B. (2017). Political party financing and corruption in Nigeria’s fourth republic: The case of 2015 General Elections. Arts and Social Sciences Journal 8(4), 2-8.
Susser, B. (1992). Approaches to the study of politics. New York: Macmillan.
The Centre for Public Policy Alternatives (CPPA). (2015).2015 Presidential election outcome: Analyses & implications. The Observer Book of Scandal 2010.
USAID & UKAID. (2015) Still above the ceiling. (A Report on Campaign Finance and Use of State Administrative Resources in the 2015 Presidential Election). Centre for Social Justice.
Yagboyaju, D.A. (2011). Nigeria’s fourth republic and the challenge of a faltering Democratization. African Studies Quarterly, 12(3), 94-101.
