A Survey on the Current Practices of Software Development Process in Malaysia

Authors

  • Fauziah Baharom Faculty of Information Technology, Universiti Utara Malaysia 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Aziz Deraman Faculty of Technology and Information. Science, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Abdul Razak Hamdan Faculty of Technology and Information. Science, University Kehangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2005.4.4

Keywords:

Software development practice, software quality, CASE tools and software testing

Abstract

Software quality is becoming increasingly important as our society becomes more dependent on computers. The required levels of quality are not likely to be achieved without giving proper attention to the software development process. Many studies regarding the practices of software development process have been carried out. The focus of these studies is mainly to examine the effectiveness of the practices. Most of studies were conducted in the United States, European countries, India, Japan and are very limited in Asian countries especially in Malaysia. In the view of that, we have carried out a study on the current practices of software development process in Malaysia. In this paper, we have analyzed and discussed the results found from the study. The structured questionnaire approach was used for data collection. The data was analyzed by using basic statistical techniques such as frequency and cross-tabulation. The
results of this study have laid out some important points regarding the practices of the software development process in Malaysia. In addition, most of the practitioners were pursuing practices that have been traditionally used by the organizations. Lack of awareness in using good software development practices could be a key factor that contributes to the occurrence of quality problems in the organizations. Consequently, the results of this study have given us a good incentive to prolong our research in the area of software process certification.

References

Bekbay, S. & Liu, S. (2003). A Study of Japanese Software Process Practices and a Potential for Improvement Using SOFL. IEEE Computer Society, 100-107.

Blackburn, D. J., Scudder, D. G. & van Wassenhove, N. L. (1996). Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development: A Global Survey of Software Developers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(12), 875-885.

Cusumano, M. & Kemerer, F. C. (2003). A Quantitative Analysis of US and Japanese Practice and Performance in Software Development. Management Science, 36(11), 1384-1406. //ict.uum.edu.my/ http Journal of ICT, 4, pp: 57-

Cusumano, M., MacCormack, A., Kemerer, F. C. & Crandall, W. (2003). A Global Survey of Software Development Practices. IEEE Software.

Groves, L., Nickson, R., Reeve, G., Reeves, S. & Utting, M. (2000). A Survey of Software Development Practices in the New Zealand Software Industry. IEEE Software.

Kaurtz, K. & Nielsen, A. P. (2000). Implementing Software Process Improvement: Two Cases of Technology Transfer. Proceedings of the 33" Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2000.

Pressman, R. S. (2001). Software Engineering: A practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill.

Sommerville, I. (2001). Software Engineering (6th ed.): Addison Wesley.

Wheeler, S. & Duggins, S. (1998). Improving Software Quality. ACM, 300-309.

Ward, A. W. & Venkataraman, B. (1999). Some observations on software quality.

ACM Southeast Regional Conference 1999.

Yazrina, Y. (2002). The Use of Information System Development Methodology in Malaysia. Jurnal Antarabangsa (Teknologi Maklumat), 2(2002), 15-34.

Downloads

Published

23-03-2005

How to Cite

Baharom, F., Deraman, A., & Hamdan, A. R. (2005). A Survey on the Current Practices of Software Development Process in Malaysia. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 4, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2005.4.4

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-06
41 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2005.4.4 OpenAlex W115667527

Most read articles by the same author(s)