Hybrid Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling and Multi-Layer Perceptron for Predicting E-Participation Success in E-Government Services: Socio-Cultural Insights and Extended Validation

Authors

  • Hapini Awang Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nur Suhaili Mansor Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Pozi Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Shehu Malami Sarkin Tudu Department of Computer Science, Sokoto State University, Nigeria
  • Isyaku Uba Haruna School of Computing, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria
  • Mazni Omar Institute for Advanced and Smart Digital Opportunities, School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mazzlida Mat Deli Graduate School of Business (UKM-GSB), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.4.7

Keywords:

Artificial neural network, Delone and McLean IS Success Model, e-government, e-participation, hybrid analysis

Abstract

Although the Delone and McLean IS Success Model (D&M) can explain the phenomenon of e-participation success (EPS), the model was initially created in an e-commerce setting and thus neglects external factors related to e-government services. To address the gap, this study revisits the D&M by extending it with four socio-cultural constructs of Trust (TR), Anonymity (AN), Nationalism (NT), and Culture (CR). Based on 428 survey data from Malaysian citizens, a hybrid methodology was employed, integrating Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) to capture non-linear relationships and enhance predictive accuracy. While hybrid modelling is common, past studies have often applied limited classification metrics, and the infrequent use of comprehensive metrics, such as Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC), may potentially affect the reliability and generalizability of these models. A comparative R² analysis between the baseline and enhanced models in this study revealed significant improvements, with R² for e-participation intention (EPI) increased from 0.620 to 0.728, EPS from 0.330 to 0.345, while User Satisfaction (US) remained strong at 0.765. The analysis predicts a 94.80% success rate for e-participation, with the MLP model further demonstrating robust classification performance, achieving an accuracy of 90.1%, a precision of 0.909, a recall of 0.948, an F1 score of 0.928, and an AUC-ROC of 0.955, outperforming other benchmark classifiers. This study contributes theoretically by introducing underexplored socio-cultural variables into the D&M while methodologically extending the hybrid PLS-SEM and MLP through a robust model validation using AUC-ROC.

References

Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does e-government impact e-participation? The influence of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071540

Adnan, M., Ghazali, M., & Othman, N. Z. S. (2022). E-participation within the context of e-government initiatives: A comprehensive systematic review. In Telematics and Informatics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100015

Afshan, S., & Sharif, A. (2016). Acceptance of mobile banking framework in Pakistan. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.005

Ahangama, & Krishnan. (2021). Are e-participation initiatives related to the quality of life of nations dependent on cultural dimensions? A country-level empirical investigation. E-Service Journal, 12(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.2979/eservicej.12.3.01

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alarabiat, A., Soares, D., & Estevez, E. (2021). Determinants of citizens’ intention to engage in government-led electronic participation initiatives through Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101537

Albahri et al. (2022). Hybrid artificial neural network and structural equation modelling techniques: A survey. Complex and Intelligent Systems, 8(2), 1781–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00503-w

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2019.08.004

Alharbi, A., & Sohaib, O. (2021). Technology readiness and cryptocurrency adoption: PLS-SEM and deep learning neural network analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 21388–21394. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055785

Alhumaid, K., Habes, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). Examining the factors influencing the mobile learning usage during COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated SEM-ANN method. IEEE Access, 9, 102567–102578. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097753

Almarzouqi, A., Aburayya, A., & Salloum, S. A. (2022a). Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-artificial neural network approach. PLoS ONE, 17(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272735

Almarzouqi, A., Aburayya, A., & Salloum, S. A. (2022b). Prediction of user’s intention to use metaverse system in medical education: A hybrid SEM-ML learning approach. IEEE Access, 10, 43421–43434. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169285

Almufarreh, A. (2024). Determinants of students’ satisfaction with AI tools in education: A PLS-SEM-ANN approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135354

Alomari, M. K., Sandhu, K., & Woods, P. (2014). Exploring citizen perceptions of barriers to e-government adoption in a developing country. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2013-0013

Al-Shammari, E. T. (2023). Readiness and acceptability for use of e-government services in Kuwait: A case study. Electronic Government. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2023.133104

Al-Sharafi, M. A., Iranmanesh, M., Al-Emran, M., Alzahrani, A. I., Herzallah, F., & Jamil, N. (2023). Determinants of cloud computing integration and its impact on sustainable performance in SMEs: An empirical investigation using the SEM-ANN approach. Heliyon, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16299

Alshboul, O., Shehadeh, A., Almasabha, G., & Almuflih, A. S. (2022). Extreme gradient boosting-based machine learning approach for green building cost prediction. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116651

Awang, H., Zahurin, M. A., Wan Rozaini, S. O., & Ishak, M. S. (2018). Examining virtual learning environment success using DeLone and McLean IS Success Model. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/50

Bahna, M. (2019). Context matters: Measuring nationalism in the countries of the former Czechoslovakia. Nationalities Papers, 47(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2018.21

Baldi, G., Megaro, A., & Carrubbo, L. (2023). Small-town citizens’ technology acceptance of smart and sustainable city development. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010325

Basri, N. H., Adnan, W. A. W., & Baharin, H. (2019). E-participation service in malaysian e-government website: The user experience evaluation. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 342–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306500.3306569

Berry, L. L., Parasuraman, A., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing.

Buccafurri, F., Fotia, L., & Lax, G. (2015). A privacy-preserving e-participation framework allowing citizen opinion analysis. Electronic Government, 11(3), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1504/ EG.2015.070131

Carter, L., Shaupp, L. C., Hobbs, J., & Campbell, R. (2011). The role of security and trust in the adoption of online tax filing. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111173568

Chong, A. Y. L. (2013). A two-staged SEM-neural network approach for understanding and predicting the determinants of m-commerce adoption. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(4), 1240–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.067

Dahalin et al. (2019). Online services index performance: Countries’ analysis in OSI ranking to improve Malaysia UN ranking. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 116–172.

Dang, T. Q., Tran, P. T., & Nguyen, L. T. (2023). Are you ready to tap into the Metaverse in higher education? Integrated by dual PLS-SEM and ANN approach. In Studies in Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48397-4_4

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914199107

Du, J. T. (2017). Research on indigenous people and the role of information and communications technology in development: A review of the literature. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(4), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2017.1397857

Forestal, J., & Philips, M. (2020). The masked demos: Associational anonymity and democratic practice. Contemporary Political Theory, 19(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00368-2

Gefen, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036519

Guo, Y. (2023). How does culture influence Chinese people’s views and actions on e-government websites? A study on citizens’ continuous use of e-government websites based on cultural model. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3598469.3598484

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Halych, O., & Demydkin, O. (2021). Features of information systems and technologies of public management and administration in the context of European integration processes. Topical Issues of Science And Practical Activity, 2(56). https://doi.org/10.37128/2411-4413-2021-2-11

Henseler, J. (2017). Partial least squares path modelling. In P.S.H. Leeflang et al. (Ed.), Advanced Methods for Modelling Markets (pp. 361–381). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53469-5

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Hsieh, J. J. P., Rai, A., Petter, S., & Zhang, T. (2012). Impact of user satisfaction with mandated CRM use on employee service quality. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1065–1080. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/41703498

Iqbal, M., & Rafiq, M. (2023). DeLone and McLean’s reformulated information systems success model: A systematic review of available literature in public sector (2011-2022). In Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2022-0162

Kamarudin, S., Omar, S. Z., Bolong, J., Osman, M. N., & Mahamed, M. (2019). ICT development of community in rural areas. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i9/6273

Kettinger, W. J., & Lee, C. C. (1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function*. Decision Sciences, 25(5-6), 737–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1540-5915.1994.tb00829.x

Krishnan, S., Teo, T. H., & Lim, J. (2017). E-participation and e-government maturity: A global perspective. In International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (pp. 420-435). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26

Kurani, A., Doshi, P., Vakharia, A., & Shah, M. (2023). A comprehensive comparative study of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) on stock forecasting. In Annals of Data Science (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 183–208). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00344-x

Lee, L. W., & Tseng, H. L. (2018). Citizen participation and e-government usage satisfaction in Taiwan. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG.

Li, R. Y. M., Tang, B., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Sustainable construction safety knowledge sharing: A partial least square-structural equation modeling and a feedforward neural network approach. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205831

Li, W. (2021). The role of trust and risk in citizens’ e-government services adoption: A perspective of the extended UTAUT model. Sustainability. 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13147671

Liu, T., Zhang, C., & Li, D. (2023). Reducing overfitting in deep neural networks by intra-class decorrelation. Proceedings - 2023 International Seminar on Computer Science and Engineering Technology, SCSET 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCSET58950.2023.00052

Minh, L., Linh, T. D. H., My, L. T. A., Trang, L. H. T., & Quyen, D. T. M. (2023). Analysis of signing civil contracts online using PLS-SEM deep neural network. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub, 5(09), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2023.062

Mishra, G., & Shah, R. (2023). Prioritising sustainability factors for public-private partnership (PPP)- based mature telecentres using the “Akshaya” project as a case. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.3135

Naidu, G., Zuva, T., & Sibanda, E. M. (2023). A review of evaluation metrics in machine learning algorithms. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35314-7_2

Nasarudin et al. (2023). A robust hybrid methodology between Applied Linear Regression Model (ALMR) and Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP). Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v22i1.61850

Nourallah, M., Öhman, P., & Amin, M. (2022). No trust, no use: How young retail investors build initial trust in financial robo-advisors. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, July. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2021-0451

Patergiannaki, Z., & Pollalis, Y. A. (2024). E-government quality from the citizen’s perspective: The role of perceived factors, demographic variables and the digital divide. International Journal of Public Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2023-0229

Pennington, R. R., Wilcox, H. D., & Varun, G. (2004). The role of system trust in business-to-consumer transactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(3), 197–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045777

Perbawani, P. S., Rahayu, R., & Anshari, I. N. (2018). Online political participation and netizen anonymity in Indonesia’s digital democracy. PCD Online Journal, 6(2), 185–212. https://doaj.org/article/1094e851830f4ce1a26e9f25ad621613

Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Poncian, J. (2021). Resource nationalism and community engagement in extractive resource governance: Insights from Tanzania. Review of African Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2021.1953975

Prakrit, S., Ashutosh, J., & Debasis, S. (2019). From e-government to good governance: The mediating role of government e-participation. AIS Electronic Library, 1–10.

Profile, S. E. E. (2022). Measuring e-goverment and e-participation. January 2020.

Qiu, X., & Zhou, K. (2023). Research on citizen’s willingness, behavior and influencing factors in digital rural governance - Based on SEM-ANN model. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-12-2022.2328019

Razmjoo et al. (2021). Investigating smart city development based on green buildings, electrical vehicles and feasible indicators. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147808

Richter, N. F., & Tudoran, A. A. (2024). Elevating theoretical insight and predictive accuracy in business research: Combining PLS-SEM and selected machine learning algorithms. Journal of Business Research, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114453

Ruesch, M. A., & Märker, O. (2012). Making the case for anonymity in e-participation1 an evaluation of real name policy in gütersloh’s second participatory budget. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v4i2.142

Sangwan, A., Sangwan, A., Sangwan, A., & Punia, P. (2024). A two-staged SEM: Artificial neural network approach for understanding and predicting the factors of students’ satisfaction with emergency remote teaching. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 1249–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10335-9

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002

Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240

Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., Shafique Khan, M. A., & Shahbaz, M. (2020). Predicting the adoption of a mobile government security response system from the user’s perspective: An application of the artificial neural network approach. Technology in Society, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techsoc.2020.101278

Shaikh, A. K., Almusharraf, A., Ahmed, N., & Khalique, N. (2023). Research themes in the use of e-participation within e-government: A citation-based content analysis. Migration Letters, 20, 141–153.

Shaikh, A. K., Baig, S., Adhikari, N., & Shihi, H. Al. (2023). E-participation system: Leveraging blockchain technology to enhance democratic engagement. International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences: Shaping the Future of Technology through Smart Computing and Engineering, ICETAS 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETAS59148. 2023.10346551

Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Luthra, S., & Kumar, A. (2024). Impact of digital assistant attributes on millennials’ purchasing intentions: A multi-group analysis using PLS-SEM, artificial neural network and fsQCA. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 943–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10339-5

Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049

Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690

Sohaib, O., Hussain, W., Asif, M., Ahmad, M., & Mazzara, M. (2020). A PLS-SEM neural network approach for understanding cryptocurrency adoption. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ACCESS.2019.2960083

Stefanovic, D., Milicevic, A., Havzi, S., Lolic, T., & Ivic, A. (2021). Information systems success models in the e-government. 20th International Symposium Infoteh-Jahorina, March, 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOTEH51037.2021.9400653

Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Understanding mobile banking individual performance. Internet Research, 27(3), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0117

Tlaiss, H., & Kauser, S. (2011). The importance of wasta in the career success of Middle Eastern managers. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/0309059 1111138026

United Nations. (2022a). E-government survey 2022, the future of digital government.

United Nations. (2022b). United Nations - Country information data. UN E-Government Knowledgebase. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/ id/79-Iran-Islamic-Republic-of

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41410412

Wang, H., Xiong, L., Xia, Y., Tang, Z. R., & Chen, M. (2024). Unraveling the prerequisites of citizen engagement intentions initiated by mobile government social media during emergencies: An integrative dual SEM-ANN analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104636

Wong, L. W., Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Lin, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven risk management for enhancing supply chain agility: A deep-learning-based dual-stage PLS-SEM-ANN analysis. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00207543.2022.2063089

Yao, Y., & Xu, P. (2022). E-participation decision across different channels. Information Technology and People, 35(3), 956–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2020-0314

Additional Files

Published

31-10-2025

How to Cite

Awang, H., Mansor, N. S., Mohd Pozi, M. S., Tudu, S. M. S., Haruna, I. U., Omar, M., & Deli, M. M. (2025). Hybrid Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling and Multi-Layer Perceptron for Predicting E-Participation Success in E-Government Services: Socio-Cultural Insights and Extended Validation. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24(4), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.4.7

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-04
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jict2025.24.4.7 OpenAlex W7118925800 Scopus 105047423136

Most read articles by the same author(s)