The Mediating Role of Perceived Ease of Learning in Teacher Readiness to Adopt Blockchain for Educational Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.2.4Keywords:
Assessment management, Blockchain in education, Teacher readiness, Perceived ease of learning, Education 5.0Abstract
Traditional educational assessment systems in Malaysia face persistent issues such as data security vulnerabilities, lack of transparency, and centralised control, which collectively undermine trust, reliability, and operational efficiency. While blockchain (BC) technology has emerged as a promising solution offering decentralisation, immutability, and enhanced data security, a critical gap exists in understanding teacher readiness to adopt such innovations within the education sector. Most prior research emphasises the technical feasibility of blockchain or user acceptance in non-educational contexts, often overlooking educators’ cognitive and pedagogical challenges when learning and using unfamiliar technologies. This study investigates how key attributes of BC relative advantage (RA), compatibility (COM), and complexity (CPX) influence teacher readiness for adoption, mediated by perceived ease of learning (PEOL). A total of 750 questionnaires were distributed, resulting in 514 valid responses from post-secondary school teachers in the northern region of Malaysia, achieved through a simple and proportionate stratified random sampling technique. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) reveals that COM and CPX significantly predict teacher readiness, while PEOL is a partial mediator. RA shows no significant direct or indirect effect, challenging assumptions about its centrality in technology adoption models. These findings contribute to the broader goals of Industrial Revolution (IR) 5.0 by highlighting the importance of human-centric, cognitively accessible technological integration strategies in education, particularly for fostering systemic reform in assessment practices.
References
Abdul Aziz, M. N., Harun, S. N., Baharom, M. K., & Kamaruddin, N. (2020). The evolution of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Interdisciplinary of Management, Economic and Social Research, 242–247.
Acharya, R., & Binu, S. (2018). Blockchain based examination system for effective evaluation and maintenance of examination records. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.6), 269. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.6.10781
Ahmad, N. A., Rosdi, R., Alias, N., Zainal, A., & Abdul Aziz, N. F. (2024). Exploring the elderly user experience in using digital health interventions: A case study of the MySejahtera application. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 13(4), 2841–2850. https://doi.org/10.11591/ eei.v13i4.7203
Ajwang, S. O., Dakay, I., & Abila, J. O. (2021). Adoption conceptual model for intelligent waste management in smart cities : Theoretical review. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.50
Al-rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A. L. I., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating Technology Acceptance Model with Innovation Diffusion Theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems. IEEE Access, PP(c), 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., & Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ app9122400
AlShamsi, M., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2022). A systematic review on blockchain adoption. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (Vol. 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094245
Alshareef, N. (2022). Investment opportunity of blockchain technology in the education sector of Saudi Arabia: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc. 2022.911126
Awang, H., Aji, Z. M., & Osman, W. R. S. (2018). The moderating effect of workload in determining the continuous usage of virtual learning environment amongst school teachers. Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
Ayyoub, A. A. M., Abu Eidah, B. A., Khlaif, Z. N., Ahmad EL-Shamali, M., & Sulaiman, M. R. (2023). Understanding online assessment continuance intention and individual performance by integrating task technology fit and expectancy confirmation theory. Heliyon, 9(11), e22068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22068
Bharadwaj, S., & Deka, S. (2021). Behavioural intention towards investment in cryptocurrency: An integration of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_7
Bozbay, Z., & Yasin, B. (2008). The impact of perceived innovation characteristics on technology adoption. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society: Annual Review, 4(4), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/v04i04/55910
Brick, J. M. (2018). Sampling to minimise nonresponse bias. In D. L. Vannette & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research (pp. 23–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_5
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. In Journal of cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp. 185–216).
Cen, C., Luo, G., Li, L., Liang, Y., Li, K., Jiang, T., & Xiong, Q. (2023). User-centered software design: User interface redesign for blockly–electron, artificial intelligence educational software for primary and secondary schools. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15065232
Chatzoglou, P. D., & Michailidou, V. N. (2019). A survey on the 3D printing technology readiness to use. International Journal of Production Research, 57(8), 2585–2599. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00207543.2019.1572934
Cheng, Z. H. (2019). User readiness and intention to adopt blockchain technology: Perspective of accounting practitioners in Malaysia. In Master thesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Chin, H., Thien, L. M., & Chiew, C. M. (2019). The reforms of national assessments in Malaysian education system. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 4(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24200/ jonus.vol4iss1pp93-111
Chin, J., & Lin, S. C. (2016). A behavioral model of managerial perspectives regarding technology acceptance in building energy management systems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070641
Chintalapati, N., & Daruri, V. S. K. (2017). Examining the use of YouTube as a in higher education: Scale development and validation of TAM model. Telematics and Informatics, 34(6), 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.008
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621
Desi, I., & Zaitul. (2021). Behavioural intention to use accounting application: Perceived ease of use as mediating variable. Analytical Biochemistry, 7(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.31580/jmi.v7i4. 1610
Doğan, N., Kibrislioğlu Uysal, N., Kelecioğlu, H., & Hambleton, R. K. (2020). An overview of e-assessment. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 35(Special Issue), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE. 2020063669
Duan, B. (2018). Education application of blockchain technology: Learning outcome and meta-diploma. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems - ICPADS (Vol. 2017, pp. 814–817). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS.2017.00114
Efgivia, M. G., Adora Rinanda, R., Suriyani, Hidayat, A., Maulana, I., & Budiarjo, A. (2021). Analysis of constructivism learning theory. Proceedings of the 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (UMGESHIC-ISHSSH 2020), 585, 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.032
Esfahbodi, A., Pang, G., & Peng, L. (2022). Determinants of consumers’ adoption intention for blockchain technology in E-commerce. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.11.001
Falah, B., Touhs, H., Karroumi, S., & Abufardeh, S. (2021). An overview of a blockchain application in education using hyperledger project. International Conference on Higher Education Advances, June, 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd21.2021.12932
Farooq, A., Dubinina, A., Virtanen, S., & Isoaho, J. (2021). Understanding dynamics of initial trust and its antecedents in password managers adoption intention among young adults. Procedia Computer Science, 184(January), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.036
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 8(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IntR-12-2017-0515
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hamid, A. A., Razak, F. Z. A., Bakar, A. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2016). The effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on continuance intention to use e-government. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(October 2015), 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00079-4
Heidari, H., Mousakhani, M., Alborzi, M., Divandari, A., & Radfar, R. (2017). Evaluating the factors affecting behavioral intention in using blockchain technology capabilities as a financial instrument. Journal of Money and Economy, 13(2), 195–219.
Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017. 1281780
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Idoga, P. E., Oluwajana, D. I., & Adeshola, I. (2022). Educational quality and technological complexity on recognition of enhanced learning platform in developing countries using PLS-SEM in a post COVID era. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(6), 2255–2273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10150-8
Iftikhar, W., Mago Vistro, D., & Mahmood, Z. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption by Malaysian higher education institutes: A perspective of integrated TAM model and TOE framework. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing Communication & Security (ICIIC 2021), 607–617.
Isa, A. M., Mydin, A.-A., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2021). SBATA model: An investigation on Malaysian primary school classroom assessment. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management (MOJEM), 9(4), 1–16.
Islam, A., Kader, M. F., & Shin, S. Y. (2019). BSSSQS: A blockchain-based smart and secured scheme for question sharing in the smart education system. Journal of Information and Communication Convergence Engineering, 17(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.6109/jicce.2019.17.3.174
Iyer, S. S., Seetharaman, A., & Maddulety, K. (2020). Education transformation using block chain technology - a student centric model. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 617, Issue December). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_19
Jani, J., Muszali, R., Nathan, S., & Abdullah, M. S. (2018). Blended learning approach using frog VLE platform towards students’ achievement in teaching games for understanding. Journal of Applied and Fundamental Science, 10(5), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v10i5s.94
Jena, R. K. (2022). Examining the the of in the UTAUT International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(4), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10040090
Kankok, J. Bin, Ambotang, A. S., & Kariming, N. F. A. (2020). Mobile learning adoption: Perspective from a form six students in Sabah, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.563
Kankok, J., Ambotang, A. S., & Salam, S. N. (2021). Mobile learning among form six students: Are they ready? International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(38), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.6380013
Khoa, B. T., Ha, N. M., Nguyen, T. V. H., & Bich, N. H. (2020). Lecturers’ intention to use the online learning management system (LMS): Empirical evidence from TAM2 model for Vietnam. Hcmcoujs - Economics and Business Administration, 10(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.46223/ hcmcoujs.econ.en.10.1.216.2020
Kloareg, M., & Causeur, D. (2009). Double sampling designs to reduce the non-discovery rate: Application to microarray data. Journal of Data Science, 7(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.6339/jds.2009.07(2).452
Kontogiannatou, A., Liaskos, J., Gallos, P., & Mantas, J. (2019). Usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning and users’ satisfaction of e-prescription and e-appointment systems for primary health care. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 262, 210–213. https://doi.org/10.3233/ SHTI190055
Li, C., Guo, J., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Bie, R., & Sun, Y. (2019). A blockchain system for e-learning assessment and certification. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartIoT.2019.00040
Li, C., Zhang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2022). Factors influencing the adoption of blockchain in the construction industry: A hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Buildings, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091349
Liang, X., & Zhao, Q. (2020). On the design of a blockchain-based student quality assessment system. 2020 International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems, HPBD and IS 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPBDIS49115.2020.9130584
Lustenberger, M., Malešević, S., & Spychiger, F. (2021). Ecosystem readiness: Blockchain adoption is driven externally. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4(August), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc. 2021.720454
Mahat, H., Anuar, N. A., Hashim, M., Nayan, N., & Saleh, Y. (2021). Pelaksanaan pentaksiran pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PDPC) berasaskan teknologi di sekolah. E-Jurnal Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.53840/ejpi.v8i1.1
Mardiputra, R. Y., Ratnawati, K., & H, A. S. (2021). The effect of technological complexity (KT) and compatibility (KOM) on the sustainability of the green and smart port concept (CTU): TAM extended approach case study at Teluk Lamong terminal, a subsidiary of PT Pelindo III. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 14(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v14i2.27668
Maslan, M., & Mohd Nor, M. Y. (2020). Kebolehlaksanaan (PBD) secara atas talian sepanjang perintah kawalan pergerakan (PKP) di daerah Sentul, Kuala Lumpur. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FIP 2020, 213–218.
Md Noh, N. H., & Amron, M. T. (2021). Exploring and in higher education institution: A PLS-SEM approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.24191/ ajue.v17i4.16193
Mitchell, I., Hara, S., & Sheriff, M. (2019). DAppER: Decentralised application for examination review. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Global Security, Safety and Sustainability, ICGS3 2019, January 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGS3.2019.8688143
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Developement of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. In Information Systems Research (Vol. 2, pp. 192–222).
Muharam, I. N., Tussyadiah, I. P., & Kimbu, A. N. (2024). Decentralising Airbnb: Testing the acceptability of blockchain-based sharing economy systems. Tourism Management, 102(December 2023), 104871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104871
Naim, H. A., & Talib, R. (2014). Cabaran pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah: Dilema guru. Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Kelestarian Insan 2014, 2014(April), 9–10.
Nasir, M., & Mohd Yunus, H. (2017). Peranan guru tingkatan dalam membentuk pelajar terarah kendiri dan meningkatkan kemahiran abad ke-21. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 5(1), 104–115.
Omar, N. N., & Phung, Y. J. (2019). E-assessment: Developing technology application prototype for easy evaluation of students’ assignments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(4), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.4.1211
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2014). An updated and streamlined : TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Purnama, S., Aini, Q., Rahardja, U., Santoso, N. P. L., & Millah, S. (2021). Design of educational learning management cloud process with blockchain 4.0 based e-portfolio. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 628. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.40557
Rahim, N. N. A., Humaidi, N., Aziz, S. R. A., & Zain, N. H. M. (2022). Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.17995
Rahman, M., Lesch, M. F., Horrey, W. J., & Strawderman, L. (2017). Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 108, 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144(March 2019), 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Ravikumar, V. (2018). Assessment in the 21 st century classroom: The need for teacher autonomy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), II(VI), 2454–6186. www.rsisinternational.org
Reyes-Mercado, P., Barajas-Portas, K., Kasuma, J., Almonacid-Duran, M., & Zamacona-Aboumrad, G. A. (2023). Adoption of digital learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging technology readiness index and UTAUT model. Journal of International Education in Business, 16(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-10-2021-0097
Rini, F., Yelfiza, & Pernanda, A. Y. (2024). Measuring user satisfaction: Open source LMS mobile application as a learning technology. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 38(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.38.2.176185
Rogers, E. M.(1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press).
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. Wiley. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=u73GjwEACAAJ
Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., & Petersen, C. (2019). Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100(July), 103315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315
Shalatska, H. M., Zotova-Sadylo, O. Y., & Makarenko, O. Y. (2020). Implementation of e-assessment in higher education. Psiholoska Obzorja. https://doi.org/10.20419/2020.29.515
Shen, H., & Xiao, Y. (2018). Research on online quiz scheme based on double-layer consortium blockchain. Proceedings - 9th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education, ITME 2018, 956–960. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITME.2018.00213
Shi, P., & Yan, B. (2016). Factors affecting RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry: Empirical evidence from China. SpringerPlus, 5(2029). https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40064-016-3708-x
Shiang Tyng, K., Badioze Zaman, H., Hanan Mohamad, U., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Perceived ease of use on visual learning application for mathematics using holography display for the topic on shape and space. F1000Research, 12, 636. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133177.1
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Sumarna, C., & Gunawan, H. (2022). Foundations of Constructivism Philosophy in Classroom Learning. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.54783/ ijsoc.v4i3.499
Sunny, F. A., Hajek, P., Munk, M., Abedin, M. Z., Satu, M. S., Efat, M. I. A., & Islam, M. J. (2022). A systematic review of blockchain applications. In IEEE Access (Vol. 10, pp. 59155–59177). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS. 2022.3179690
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1982.6447463
Tsai, C.-T., Wu, J.-L., Lin, Y.-T., & Yeh, M. K.-C. (2022). Design and development of a blockchain-based secure scoring mechanism for online learning. Educational Technology and Society, 25(3), 105–121.
Turkanović, M., Hölbl, M., Košič, K., Heričko, M., & Kamišalić, A. (2018). EduCTX: A blockchain-based higher education credit platform. IEEE Access, 6(January), 5112–5127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2789929
Ullah, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alfarraj, O., Alalwan, N., Alzahrani, A. I., Ramayah, T., & Kumar, V. (2022). Hybridising cost saving with trust for blockchain technology adoption by financial institutions. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 6(March), 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.teler.2022.100008
Ullah, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., & Alblehai, F. M. (2021). Blockchain technology adoption in smart learning environments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041801
Ullah, N. (2020). Integrating TAM/TRI/TPB frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for DLT adoption by service and manufacturing industries-Pakistan context. 2020 International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship, ICTE 2020, 0–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICTE47868.2020.9215537
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical acceptance extension model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Wahyuni, D., Ariadi, G., Sugihartini, N., & Mertayasa, I. (2023). The impact of achievement motivation on educational compatibility mediated by perceived ease of use. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-10-2022.2327429
Wang, G., Zhang, H., Xiao, B., Chung, Y. C., & Cai, W. (2019). EduBloud: A blockchain-based education cloud. 2019 Computing, Communications and IoT Applications (ComComAp), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/ComComAp46287.2019.9018818
Wang, X., Liu, L., Liu, J., & Huang, X. (2022). Understanding the determinants of blockchain technology adoption in the construction industry. Buildings, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ buildings12101709
Wanotayapitak, S., Saraubon, K., & Nilsook, P. (2019). Process design of cooperative education management system by cloud-based blockchain E-Portfolio. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 15(8), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i08.10374
Wong, L., Leong, L., Hew, J., Tan, G. W., & Ooi, K. (2019). Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, March, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005
Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., & Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112(February), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trc.2020.01.027
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-05Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
2002 - 2020
