Assessing Community Participation in Natural Conservation and Ecotourism Activities in Jeli, Kelantan

Authors

  • Huda Farhana binti Mohamad Muslim FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE MALAYSIA (FRIM), Malaysia
  • Nur Fazreen binti Zainal Social Forestry Programme, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Norhafiza binti Shafie United Nations Development Programme, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia
  • Norliyana binti Adnan Social Forestry Programme, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Azizul bin Mahadi Social Forestry Programme, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nurul Amira Izzaty binti Horsali United Nations Development Programme, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/jeth2026.6.9

Keywords:

Community participation, Ecotourism, Natural resource conservation, Sustainable tourism, Rural development

Abstract

Sustainable tourism seeks to balance environmental conservation with socio-economic development, particularly in forest-dependent rural districts such as Jeli, Kelantan. This study aims to assess the level of community involvement in conservation and ecotourism initiatives. A cross-sectional survey of 219 household heads from three villages was conducted, complemented by rapid rural appraisal and consultations with community leaders. Participation was measured across four dimensions, which are planning, implementation, monitoring, and benefit-sharing. Results of studies using an engagement index were analyzed through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. The findings indicate moderate overall participation (Engagement Index = 0.33), with stronger involvement in benefit-sharing (0.53) and implementation (0.30), but comparatively low engagement in planning (0.26) and monitoring (0.24), suggesting functional rather than empowered participation. Perceived benefits were largely environmental and social, while direct economic gains were limited. Regression results reveal that knowledge exposure (B = 0.28, p < .001) and association membership (B = 0.18, p = .01) significantly predict participation, whereas years of formal education do not, with the model explaining 23% of variance (R² = 0.23). This study contributes new district-level empirical evidence on participation dynamics in rural Malaysia. It highlights the critical role of environmental knowledge and social capital in strengthening inclusive governance, offering practical insights for designing more participatory and resilient ecotourism frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. K., & Mansor, A. E. (2006). Social capital and rural community development in Malaysia. In S. Yokoyama & T. Sakurai (Eds.), Potential of social capital for community development: Report of the APO survey and symposium on redesigning integrated community development 2003–2005 (pp. 141–171). Asian Productivity Organization.

Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research.Human relations, 61(8), 1139-1160.

Harris, R. W. (2009). Tourism in Bario, Sarawak, Malaysia: A case study of pro-poor community-based tourism integrated into community development. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 14(2), 125–135.https://doi.org/10.1080/10941660902847179

Karunanithi, K., Tsuge, T., Mohamad Muslim, H. F., Akin, W., Hassan, N., Yudono, P., Numata, S., Takahashi, S., Voon, M., & Onuma, A. (2026). Perceptions of national parks among adjacent communities: A case study of Kubah National Park using best–worst scaling. Journal for Nature Conservation, 91, 127228.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2026.127228

Nizamiev, A., Momosheva, G., Abdisatarov, K., Borombaev, A., Sergeyeva, A., & Kamchiev, U. (2025). Sustainable Development of Ecotourism as a Driver of Local Development in the" Kulun-Ata" Nature Reserve, Kyrgyzstan: Perceptions of Local Communities. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites,63, 2764-2773.

Rachmawati, E., Hidayati, S., & Rahayuningsih, T. (2021). Community involvement and social empowerment in tourism development. Media Konservasi, 26(3), 193–201.https://doi.org/10.29244/medkon.26.3.193-201

Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Jaafar, M., Ahmad, A. G., & Barghi, R. (2016). Community participation in World Heritage Site conservation and tourism development. Tourism Management, 58, 142–153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.016

Shakarmamadova, F., van Beynen, P. E., & Akiwumi, F. A. (2020). Assessing the contribution of ecotourism and community-based ecotourism to community resilience in the Pamirs. Sustainability, 12(11), 4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114574

Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., Sadeghi, S. M. M., Wolf, I. D., & Deljouei, A. (2022). Relationship analysis of local community participation in sustainable ecotourism development in protected areas, Iran. Land, 11(10), 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101871

Somarriba-Chang, M. de los A., & Gunnarsdóttir, Y. (2012). Local community participation in ecotourism and conservation issues in two nature reserves in Nicaragua. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(8), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.681786

Stem, C. J., Lassoie, J. P., Lee, D. R., Deshler, D. D., & Schelhas, J. W. (2010). Community participation in ecotourism benefits: The link to conservation practices and perspectives. Society & Natural Resources, 23(6), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/0894192090309177

Tosun, C., & Timothy, D. J. (2003). Community participation in the tourism development process. Journal of Tourism Studies, 14(2), 2–15.

Yamane, Taro, (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Harper and Row.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mohamad Muslim, H. F. binti, Zainal, N. F. binti, Shafie, N. binti, Adnan, N. binti, bin Mahadi, M. A., & Horsali, N. A. I. binti. (2026). Assessing Community Participation in Natural Conservation and Ecotourism Activities in Jeli, Kelantan. Journal of Event, Tourism and Hospitality Studies, 6, 130-147. https://doi.org/10.32890/jeth2026.6.9

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/jeth2026.6.9 OpenAlex W7208749574