Research Article Published 24 January 2016

Attitude toward Conflict and Family Business Succession

How to Cite

How to Cite

Salim, L., Mohd. Shariff, M. N., & Ahmad Arshad, D. (2016). Attitude toward Conflict and Family Business Succession. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8851
Linda Salim
Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya, Indonesia
Mohd. Noor Mohd. Shariff
School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Darwina Ahmad Arshad
School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
423
Abstract + full text
Downloads
542
PDF and XML
Percentile
89th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

Conflict is central in family business. Family business consists of family members working  together,  using  family  and  business  logics.  Efforts  are  done  to  mitigate  the impact of role conflicts. Nevertheless, conflict remains the top reason for discontinuity. Findings suggested that participants with positive attitude toward conflict take more relaxed  approach  toward  succession,  with  larger  next  generation  talent  pool.  This group  is  egalitarian  in  strategic  decision  making  and  characteristically  optimistic. Participants with negative attitude have a smaller talent pool for succession, since they reserve leadership for the select few. They are more cautious, requiring successors to implement their visions beforehand, and are less optimistic. This study contributes to the body of knowledge and family business practitioners. Firstly, this paper introduces the use of attitude toward conflict to predict behaviour during succession. Secondly, this  paper  inspires  leaders  to  assess  their  attitudes,  and  if  required  to  change  their attitudes, so that they can plan their succession accordingly.

Family business conflict family business succession attitude attitude toward conflict

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 30-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
1
Open references only View →
Crossref
1
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 423
PDF downloads 542
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 89th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.21
Works this article cites 29

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 32
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Blumentritt, T., Mathews, T., & Marchisio, G. (2013). Game theory and family business succession: An introduction. Family Business Review, 26(1), 56-67.
  2. Bresnahan, M. J., Donohue, W. A., Shearman, S. M., & Guan, X. (2009). Research note: Two measures of conflict orientation. Conflict Resolution, 26(3), 365-379.
  3. Caspersz, D., & Thomas, J. (2013). Developing positivity in family business leaders. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi: 0894486513505641.
  4. Chandler, A. D. (1980). Managerial hierarchies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2010). Family involvement, family-influence, and family-centred non-economic goals in small firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 1-27.
  6. Chrisman, J. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of current research in family business: An identification and review of 25 influential articles. Family Business Review, 23(1), 9-26.
  7. Cicellin, M., Mussolino, D., Martinez, M., & Iacono, M. P. (2013). Towards the Construct of Paternalism to Investigate Control in Family Business Governance. Corporate Ownership and Control / 10(4), 2013, 317-328
  8. Colli, A. (2003). The history of family business, 1850-2000. (Vol. 47). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Credit Suisse, (2011). Asian family businesses report 2011. Switzerland: Credit Suisse.
  10. Creswell, J. C. (2011). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Dawson, A., & Hjorth, D. (2012). Advancing family business research through narrative analysis. Family Business Review, 25(3), 339-355.
  12. De Massis, A. V., Kotlar, J., Mazzola, P., Minola, T., & Sciascia, S. (2016). Conflicting Selves : Family Owners’ Multiple Goals and Self-control Agency Problems in Private Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 11.10.2016. http://www. research. lancs. ac.uk › Research › Publications and Outputs
  13. De Massis, A. V., Sieger, P., Chua, J. H. & Vismara, S. (2016). Incumbents’ Attitude toward Intrafamily Succession: an Investigation of its Antecedents., Family Business Review. 29, (3), 278-300 23.
  14. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit Measures in Social Cognition Research: Their Meaning and Use., Annual Reviews Psychology, 54,297–327 doi: 10.1146/ annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.http://www.psy.ohio-state.edu/faculty/ fazio/ reprints.../FazioOlsonAnnualReview2003.pdf
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Free Press.
  16. Halls, P. D. (1988). A historical overview of family firms in the United States. Family Business Review, 1(1), 51-68.
  17. Hatak, I. R., & Roessl, D. (2013). Relational competence-based knowledge transfer within intrafamily succession: An experimental study. Family Business Review, 0894486513480386.
  18. Hay Group, (2012). Family business in Asia: Breaking the third-generation curse. Singapore: Hay Group.
  19. James, A. E., Jennings, J. E., & Breitkreuz, R. S. (2012). Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review, 25(1), 87-108. 88 Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1) 2016: 75-
  20. Jaskiewicz, P., Heinrichs, K., Rau, S. B., & Reay, T. (2015). To be or not to be: How family firms manage family and commercial logics in succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/etap.12146.
  21. Jaskiewicz, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Balkin, D. B., & Reay, T. (2013). Is nepotism good or bad? Types of nepotism and implications for knowledge management. Family Business Review, 26(2), 121-139.
  22. Jennings, J. E., Breitkreuz, R. S., & James, A. E. (2013). When family members are also business owners: Is entrepreneurship good for families? Family Relations, 62(3), 472-489.
  23. Lam, W. (2011). Dancing to two tunes: Multi-entity roles in the family business succession process. International Small Business Journal, 29(5), 508-533.
  24. Levinson, H. (1971). Conflicts that Plague Family Businesses. Harvard Business Review. 90-95. http://gsappweb.rutgers.edu/cstudents/readings/Summer/ Ballet_ FamilySystems/levinson_conflicts.pdf
  25. Long, R. G. & Crisman, J. J. (2014). Management Succession in Family Business. In S. Goel and P. Sharma (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Family Business (247-268)
  26. Memili, E., Chang, E. P. C., Kellermanns, F. W. & Welsh, D. (2015). Role Conflicts of family members in family firms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1(24), 143–151.
  27. Michael-Tsabari, N., & Weiss, D. (2013). Communication traps: Applying game theory to succession in family firms. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi: 089448651349506.
  28. Nordqvist, M. & Melin, L. (2010). The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 15-25.
  29. Salvato, C., Minichilli, A., & Piccaretta, R. (2012). Faster route to CEO suite: Nepotism or managerial proficiency? Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0894486511427559.
  30. Shepherd, (2016). An Emotions Perspective for Advancing the Fields of Family Business and Entrepreneurship: Stocks, Flows, Reactions, and Responses., Family Business Review., 29(2) 151 –158. sagepub.com/journalsPermissions. navDOI: 10.1177/ 0894486516634943
  31. Spriggs, M., Yu A., Deeds D., & Sorenson, R. L. (2012). Too many cooks in the kitchen: Innovative capacity, collaborative network orientation, and performance in small family businesses. Family Business Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0894486512468600 Google Scholar Link
  32. Stewart, A. & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Why can’t a family business be more like non-family business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58-

Most read articles by the same author(s)