Managing Social and Economic Performance in Social Enterprise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8850Keywords:
Social enterprise, hybrid organisations, microfinance, management control system, performance measurement system (PMS)Abstract
Social enterprise encounter has received enormous pressure to manage both social and economic objectives. This has given rise to tension in managing social and economic objectives leading to tension within the organisation. Failure to manage this tension and competing demands between these two objectives raise concerns toward mission drift issue. The paper discusses the conceptualisation of social enterprise and its competing demands, and the analysis of normative and empirical research on performance measurement system (PMS) and management control in social enterprise. From the normative literature, a number PMS models for social enterprise were advanced. However, there is lack of empirical research on management control and performance measurement in social enterprise, especially regarding the ways an organisation designs and uses its PMS to achieve a balance between social and economic objectives. Hence, a qualitative method is recommended as a developing strategy for managing the competing demands since they are very much dependent on the manner organisational view and deal with the needs of the two objectives.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Business Management and Accounting (JBMA) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Journal of Business Management and Accounting (JBMA) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.