Research Article Published 24 January 2016

A Qualitative Case Study on the Use of Balance Scorecard to Control Performance of a Local Government-Owned Water Supply Company in Indonesia

How to Cite

How to Cite

Praptapa, A., Yahya, M. A., & Sawandi, N. (2016). A Qualitative Case Study on the Use of Balance Scorecard to Control Performance of a Local Government-Owned Water Supply Company in Indonesia. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8846
Agung Praptapa
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Mohd. Azlan Yahya
Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Norfaiezah Sawandi
Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
374
Abstract + full text
Downloads
254
PDF and XML
Percentile
89th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

This paper discusses how the Balance Scorecard is applied in a water supply company in Indonesia. The company investigated in this study was a local government-owned water supply company is responsible for generating profit, as well as having a social function.  Performance  becomes  an  important  issue  in  this  type  of  company,  not  just from the financial aspect, but also regarding non-financial performance. This research was  a  longitudinal  case  study.  By  applying  ethnography,  the  researcher  participated in  the  process  of  controlling  performance  while  performing  the  research,  where  the case company modified the four perspectives of Balance Scorecard into four aspects of performance, i.e., financial, service, operational, and human resource performance aspects. This modified balance scorecard was used to control people in achieving their targeted performance. A management control system model was then used as a tool and mechanism to control performance.

Case study ethnography management control systems balance scorecard performance

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 30-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 374
PDF downloads 254
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 89th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.24
Works this article cites 14

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 17
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage Publications.
  2. Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
  3. BPPSPAM. (2014). Buku Kinerja PDAM 2014. Jakarta: BPPSPAM.
  4. Brewer, J. D. (2010). Ethnography. New Delhi: Rawat Publication. Supply Company in Indonesia: 1-
  5. Burns, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2000). Conceptualising management accounting change: An institutional framework. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 3-25.
  6. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organisational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 28, 127-168.
  7. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2011). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalisation – Concepts and cases (9th ed.). New York: Cengage Learning.
  8. Hoque, Z., Covaleski, M. A., & Gooneratne, T. N. (2013). Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organisational and accounting research. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 26 (7), 1170-1198.
  9. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balance scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70 (1), 71-79.
  10. Knouse, S. (1979). Toward a psychological theory of accountability. Interfaces. 9(3), 58-63.
  11. Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation, and incentives (3rd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
  12. Modell, S. (2015). Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in accounting research: A critical realist critique. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1138-1150.
  13. Praptapa, A. (2009). The art of controlling people. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  14. Ribeiro, J. A., & Scapens, R. W. (2006). Institutional theories in management accounting change. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 3(2), 94-111.
  15. Roper, J. M., & Shapira, J. (2000). Ethnography in nursing research. London: Sage.
  16. Simons, R. (1995) Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  17. Woods, M. (2009). A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research, 20, 69-81.