Research Article Published 22 July 2016

The Adoption of Lean Principles to Reduce Resistance to Change in Transforming a Shipyard

How to Cite

How to Cite

Yushak, M. S., Dollah, R., & Abu Bakar, N. (2016). The Adoption of Lean Principles to Reduce Resistance to Change in Transforming a Shipyard. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8840
Mohamed Shamaun Yushak
Boustead Naval Shipyard, c/o Royal Malaysian Navy Base, Lumut, Perak, Malaysia
Rozzeta Dollah
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia International Campus, Jalan Semarak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Nooh Abu Bakar
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia International Campus, Jalan Semarak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Full text
PDF View full text 342 KB · 17 pages XML JATS full text 84 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 48 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8840 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
313
Abstract + full text
Downloads
229
PDF and XML
Percentile
89th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

Abstract

A Shipyard is trying to change, but facing employee Resistance to Change (RTC). Resistance is attributed to the dysfunctional organisational context in the form of technical and political/structural issues giving rise to non-conformance behaviour. An action research was conducted with the author as a participant researcher to understand and identify the underlying behaviour of the employees. Lean production was used as an intervention to re-couple tasks to behavioural elements. Resistance is due to incoherency of a person’s belief in established standards, giving rise to cognitive dissonance. Lean principles reduces dissonance, creating psychological flow in the workforce and the momentum for change. As a result, the shipyard managed to recovered the delay of a ship and delivered it on-time, with cost avoidance of RM63 million in liquidated damage. The Shipyard also managed to reduce the average delay for ships undergoing repair to 6 months, compared to previous average delay of 17 months. This research was a collaboration between the employees and the researcher to identify the source of RTC. The outcome is both, insightful in creating change and contribution to knowledge. The significance of this study is the realisation of how individuals and groups’ past behaviour can subconsciously challenge the existence of the organisation and better methods. The study provides an exploratory model on the workings of human behavioural elements in Lean production. The knowledge of how the researcher gained utility from resistance and mediate through the application of these techniques would be of considerable benefit to leaders of change management.

Keywords
Lean action research resistance to change theory of cognitive dissonance

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
1
Open references only View →
Crossref
1
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
0
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 313
PDF downloads 229
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 89th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 92

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8840
OpenAlex · W2943082333

References

References 80
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Aarts’, H., Verplanken, B., & Knippenberg, A. V. (1998). Predicting behaviour from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355-1374.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1986). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behaviour: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(179-211).
  4. Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behaviour: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107-122.
  5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. in D. Albarracı´n, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 173–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behaviour: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behaviour. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33. 101–117.
  7. Avison, D., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling action research projects. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28-45.
  8. Beale, J. (2009). Understanding the influences on employee motivation for lean: An individual-level analysis. Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Cardiff University, pp. 1-346.
  9. Bhasin, S. & Burcher, P. (2006).”Lean viewed as a philosophy”. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(1), 56–72.
  10. Bhasin, S. (2012). An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Management Decision, 50(3), 439–458.
  11. Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A. (2001a). Resistance to organizational change: The role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(8), 372–382.
  12. Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A. (2001b). Resistance to organisational change: The role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7), 534–548.
  13. Braganza, A. (2009). Changing behaviours: An activities-based approach. Strategic HR Review, 8(5),32-37. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  14. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1): 9-28, SAGE Publication.
  15. Burnes, B., & James, H. (1995). Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(8), 14–33.
  16. Burnes, B. (2015). Understanding resistance to change – Building on Coch and French. Journal of Change Management, 15(2), 92-116.
  17. Cassel, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. Sage Publications, London, pp. 1-372.
  18. Canning, J., & Found, P. A., (2015). The effect of resistance in organizational change programmes. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3), 274–295.
  19. Cappellatti, L. G., & Baker, C. R. (2010). Developing human capital through a pragmatic action research project: A French case study. Action Research, 8(2), 211-232.
  20. Chandler, D., & Torbert, B. (2003). Transforming inquiry and action: Interweaving 27 flavors of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 133–152.
  21. Chapell, C., Rhodes, C., Solomon, N., Tennant, M., & Yates, L. (2003). Reconstructing the Lifelong Learner: Pedagogy and identity in individual, organisational and social change. RoutledgeFalmer, New York, pp. 104.
  22. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organisation. Sage Publications, pp. 1-177.
  23. Coghlan, D., & Shani, A. B. (2013). Creating action research quality in organisation development: Rigorous, Reflective and Relevant. Springer Science and Business Media New York, pp. 1-64.
  24. Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action Research for Operations Management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 220–240.
  25. Costley, C., Elliot, G., & Gibbs, P. (2010). Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider-researchers. Sage Publication, pp. 1-194.
  26. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd Edition. Sage Publication, pp. 1-269.
  27. Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2002). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications. Routledge, London, pp. 1-369.
  28. Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging resistance to change. Journal of Behavioural Science, 35(1), 25-41.
  29. Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hart, W. (1996). Designing and conducting research, inquiry in education and social science. Simon and Schuster. USA, pp. 1-370.
  30. Duhigg, C. (2012). The Power of Habit - Why we do what we do in Life and Business. Random House Trade Paperbacks. New York, 1-400.
  31. Emiliani, M. L. (1998). “Lean Behaviours”. Management Decision, 36(9), 615–631.
  32. Emiliani, M. L. (2003). ‘Linking leaders’ beliefs to their behaviours and competencies. Management Decision, 41(9), 893–910.
  33. Emiliani, M. L., & Stec, D. J. (2004). Using value-stream maps to improve leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(8), 622–645.
  34. Emblemsvag, J. (2014). Lean project planning in shipbuilding. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 30(2), 79-88.
  35. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford CA, Standford University Press, pp. 1-291.
  36. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2005). Theory-based behaviour change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 27–31.
  37. Ford, J. D., Ford L. W., McNamara, R. T. (2002). Resistance and the background conversations to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210422991
  38. Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2003). The character of a corporation. How your company’s culture can make or break your business. Harper Collins Business, London 2nd Edition, pp. 1-272.
  39. Graves, A., & Crute V., (2000). A lean approach to change management. International Journal of Aerospace Management, 1(2), 167-177.
  40. Graafland, J., Kaptein, M., & Schouten, C. M. (2006). Business dilemmas and religious belief: An explorative study among Dutch executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 53-70.
  41. Harmon-Jones, E. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7–16.
  42. Heracleous, L. (2001). An ethnographic study of culture in the context of organisational change. The journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 37(4), Appendix 1.
  43. Heracleous, L., & Barrett, M. (2001). Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 755-778.
  44. Hinz, O. (1998). The stumbling stone method, The Learning Organisation, 5(3), 138-143. MCB University Press. ISSN 0969-6474.
  45. Jimmieson, N. L., Peach, M. W., & Katherine, M. (2008). Utilizing the theory of planned behaviour to inform change management: An investigation of employee intentions to support organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 44(2), 237-262.
  46. Jimmieson, N. L., White, K. M., & Zajdlewicz, L. (2009). Psychosocial predictors of intentions to engage in change supportive behaviours in an organisational context. Journal of Change Management, 9(3), 233-250.
  47. Karube, M., Numugami, T., & Kato, T. (2009). Exploring organisational deterioration:’Organisational Deadweight’ as a cause of malfunction of strategic initiatives in Japanese firms. Long Range Planning, 42(4), 518-544.
  48. Keller, S. & Aiken, C. (2008). The inconvenient truth about change management. McKinsey & Company. Business Review Press, USA, pp. 1-20.
  49. Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. HBR.ORG the Test of Leader. Reprint 95204, 57-68.
  50. Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing Strategies for Change. Harvard Business Review Press, USA, 21-23.
  51. Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Why transformation fail. Harvard Business Review Press. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 1-12.
  52. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social sciences; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, Sagepub. 21-23.
  53. Mabin, V. J., Forgeson, S., & Green, L. (2001). Harnessing resistance: Using the theory of constraints to assist change management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(2/3/4), 168–191.
  54. McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology and People, 14(1), 45-59.
  55. McKay, K., Kuntz, J. R. C., & Näswall, K. (2013). The effect of affective commitment, communication and participation on resistance to change: The role of change readiness. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 29-40.
  56. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2000). Action research in organisations. Routledge, London. Pp. 1-331.
  57. Mdletye, M. A., Coetzee, J., & Ukpere, W. I. (2014). The reality of resistance to change behaviour at the department of correctional services of South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, 5(3), 548-560.
  58. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualisation of organisation commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  59. Nelson, L. (2003). A case study in organisational change: Implications for theory. The Learning Organization, 10(1), 18-30.
  60. Nordin, N., Md. Deros, B., & Abdul Wahab, D. (2010). Relationship between organisational change and LEAN manufacturing implementation in Malaysian automotive industry. The 14th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management System Conference and The 14th Asia Pacific Regional Meeting of International Foundation for Production Research, pp. 22-24. http://www. apiems.net/archive/apiems2010/paper.php.
  61. Ogbonna, E., & Wilkinson B. (2003). The false promise of organisational culture change: A case study of middle managers in grocery retailing. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1151-1178.
  62. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system. Beyond large-scale production. Taylor & Francis Group. Florida. USA, pp. 1-163.
  63. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-683.
  64. Oreg, S., & Gerro, K. T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behaviour cross-nationality. Values the theory of planned behaviour and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behaviour, 38(4), 462-483.
  65. Oreg, S., Bayazıt, M., Vakola, M., Arciniega, L., Armenakis A., Barkauskiene, R., Bozionelos, N., Fujimoto, Y., Gonza´lez, L., Han J., Hrˇebı´cˇkova´, M., Jimmieson, N., Kordacˇova´, J., Mitsuhashi, H., Mlacˇic´, B., Feric I., Topic´ M. K., Ohly S., Saksvik P. O., Hetland H., Saksvik, I., van Dam K. (2008). Dispositional resistance to change: Measurement equivalence and the link to personal values across 17 Nations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 935–944.
  66. Pardo, D. V., Manuela, Martinez Fuentes, & Clara. (2003). Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study, Management Decision, Universitat de Valencia Spain. Management Decision, 41(2), 149-155.
  67. Peach, Megan, Jimmieson, Nerina, L., & White, Katherine M. (2005). Beliefs underlying employee readiness to support a building relocation: A theory of planned behaviour perspective. Organization Development Journal, 23(3), 9-22.
  68. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognising ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organisational change. Case Western Reserve University. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794.
  69. Pieterse, J. H., Caniëls M. C. J., & Homan T. (2012). Professional discourses and resistance to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(6), 798–818.
  70. Skrudupaite, A. & Jucevicius R. (2011). Critical success factors for the implementation of the synchronized production system. Socialoniai Mokslai, 2(72), 16-23.
  71. Stone, K. B. (2010). Kaizen Teams: Integrated HRD practices for successful team building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(1), 61–77.
  72. Smollan, R. K. (2009). The emotional rollercoaster of organisational change: Affective responses to organisational change, their cognitive antecedents and behavioural consequences. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management at Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
  73. Styhre, A. (2002). Non-Linear change in organisations: Organisation change management informed by complex theory. Leadership and Organisational Development Journal, 23(6), 343-351.
  74. Tasie, G. O. (2009). Can Japanese management styles be applied to Africa? African Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 233-240.
  75. Vakil, T. (2006). An exploratory model for studying rhetorical strategies during organizational change. University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada, pp. 1-267.
  76. Yahyagil, M. Y. (2004). The interdependence between the concepts of organisational culture and organisational climate: An empirical investigation Instanbul University. Journal of Business Administration, 33(1), 69-98.
  77. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 4th Edition. Sage Inc., U.S.A. 14(1), 69-71.
  78. Zabid, M. A. R., Sambasivam M., & Rahman A. A. (2004). The influence of organisational culture on attitudes toward organisational change. Leadership & Organisational Development Journal, 25(2), 161-179.
  79. Zairi, M. (2005). TQM sustainability: How to maintain its gain through transformational change. Bradford University School of Management. 175-188.
  80. Zuber-Skeritt, O., & Perry C. (2002). Action research within organisations and university thesis writing. The Learning Organisation, 9(4), 171-179.