Research Article Published 22 July 2016

University-Industry Collaboration in Research and Development in Malaysian Universities

How to Cite

How to Cite

Othman, N. (2016). University-Industry Collaboration in Research and Development in Malaysian Universities. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(2), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8834
Norazimah Othman
Kolej Professional MARA Ayer Molek, Melaka, Malaysia
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
450
Abstract + full text
Downloads
269 +1
PDF and XML
Percentile
91th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

The  focus  of  this  study  is  on  types  of  university-industry  collaboration  in  R&D projects  in  Malaysian  universities.  The  study  identified  the  benefits  derived  from University-Industry collaborations as it relates to performance of R&D project and the  characteristics  of  R&D  projects  that  encourage  industry  to  collaborate  with universities. It also makes recommendations towards increasing performance of R&D projects based on the data collected and analysed.  Exploratory approach was used in this study. This approach explored the collaboration types and how it contributed to R&D performance. Quantitative analysis was used by analysing questionnaire data. The reliability of the questionnaire items was tested. The respondents were people with experience in U-I collaborations. Data was analysed based on the five major elements in the theoretical framework. These are: benefits, performance, characters, practice and barrier. Based on the findings from the study, all of these five elements should be combined to ensure better R&D performance. The contribution of this study is the suggestions to universities in Malaysia and the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) to encourage increasing numbers of U-I collaborations.

University-industry (U-I) collaboration research and development (R&D) R&D benefits R&D performance

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
1
Open references only View →
Crossref
1
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 450
PDF downloads 269
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 91th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 13

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 15
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Banji Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, & Boladale Abiola Adebowale. (2012). University-industry collaboration as a determinant of innovation in Nigeria. Institution and Economics. 4(1), 21-46.
  2. Benyamin Lakitan, Dudi Hidayat, & Siti Herlinda. (2012). Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institution. Technology in Society. 34(2012), 227-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.06.001
  3. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer. 38(1). doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
  4. Chandran Govidaraju, V. G. R. (2010). R&D commercialization challenges for developing countries: The case of Malaysia. Technology Monitor. 25-30. http://www.techmonitor.net/tm/images/d/dd/10nov_dec_sf3.pdf
  5. Cristoph Grimpe, & Katrin Hussinger. (2013). Formal and informal knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: complementarity effects and innovation. performance. 20(8), pp. 683-700. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ pdf/10.1080/13662716.2013.856620
  6. Donald Rumball. (2007). Case study of collaborative innovation in Canadian small firms. Pp. 1-19. www.strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/sbrp-rppe.nsf/en/rd02182e.html Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Flavia Di Costa, & Marco Sozzali. (2009). University-industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination, technovation. Elsevier Science. 29(6) 498-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj. technovation.2008.11.003
  7. Johan Bruneel, Pablo D’Este, & Ammon Salter. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
  8. Karl Wennberg, Johan Wiklund, & Mike Wright. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128-1143.
  9. Kurtulus Kaymaz, & Kadir Yasin Eryigit. (2011). Determining factors hindering 185-213.
  10. Markus Perkmann, & Kathryn Walsh. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy. 37, 1884-1891.
  11. Markus Perkmann, Zella King, & Stephen Pavelin. (2011). Engaging excellent? Effect of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy. 40(4), 539-552.
  12. Mike Wright, Andy Lockett, Brat Clarysse, & Martin Binks. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481-501.
  13. Mike Wright, Brat Clarysse, Andy Lockett, & Mirjam Knockaert. (2008). Mid-ramge universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy. 37, 1205-1223.
  14. Muscio, A, et al. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities?. Research Policy. 42(2013), 63–75.
  15. Rejean Landry, Malek Saihi, Nabil Amara, & Mathieu Ouimet. (2010). Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities. Research Policy. 39(10), 1387-1403.