Articles Published 29 January 2024

Measurement of a Balanced Scorecard and SWOT Analysis in Consumer Lending Strategy of Bank Sumsel Babel Muntok

Dapot Hamonangan Hutagalung
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Reniati Reniati
Faculty of Economics, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Citations
1
Semantic Scholar, highest of the sources checked
Reads
485 +5
Abstract + full text
Downloads
490 +3
PDF and XML

Article

The balanced scorecard measures the overall performance of the organization from four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, learning, and growth. Under a quantitative research design, this research tries to measure the performance of consumer lending distribution at Bank Sumsel Babel Muntok branch by using Balance Scorecard perspectives, followed by a SWOT analysis and an assessment of the company's position according to the Internal External Matrix. The object of this research is one of the regional development bank's branches. Primary data were collected through a questionnaire, and secondary data were obtained through the financial report PT Bank Pembangunan Daerah Sumatera Selatan dan Bangka Belitung (Bank Sumsel Babel). The matrix aligns with the company's SWOT, and the results are then explained using the IFAS Matrix (Strength - Weakness) and EFAS Matrix (Opportunities - Threats). The results of the IFAS and EFAS Matrix are depicted in the Cartesian SWOT Diagram. Based on the Cartesian SWOT Diagram, the distribution of multipurpose lending Bank Sumsel Babel Muntok is in quadrant I, where the strategy that needs to be implemented is aggressive. An aggressive strategy makes the organization's strengths in maximizing the opportunities available.

Balanced scorecard, IFAS and EFAS matrix, multipurpose lending, regional development bank, SWOT Analysis

How to Cite

Measurement of a Balanced Scorecard and SWOT Analysis in Consumer Lending Strategy of Bank Sumsel Babel Muntok. (2024). Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 14(1), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2024.14.1.7

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 02-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

Semantic Scholar
1
S2AG corpus View →
OpenCitations
1
Open references only View →
OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 485
PDF downloads 490
XML downloads 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 15

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
OpenAlex · W4391354227
Semantic Scholar · CorpusID 267372282

References

References 23
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Aditiyo, M. (2012). Evaluasi penerapan balanced scorecard sebagai sistem pengukuran organisasi. Jurnal Program Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2(3).
  2. Daft, R. L. (2010). Era Baru Manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  3. Goyal, D. S., Harahap, E. P., & Santoso, N. A. (2022). Analysis of financial technology implementation on the quality of banking services in Indonesia: SWOT Analysis. IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), 4(1), 77-82.
  4. Hassany, E., & Pambekti, G. (2022). Review on The application of open banking in sharia banking: A SWOT Analysis. Journal Economics Keuangan Syariah, 5(1). 69-91.
  5. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Linking The Balanced Scorecard into Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  6. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., & Rugelsjoen, B. (2010). Managing alliances with the balanced scorecard. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/01/managing-alliances-with-the-balanced-scorecard.
  7. Kasmir. (2012). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  8. Kasmir. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. 7th ed. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  9. Kukuh, W., Pratiwi, N. A., & Eliza, M. (2021). Penerapan balanced scorecard serta analisis SWOT dalam perancangan strategi pada badan usaha milik daerah PT Bank X. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 9(4), 1487–1499. https://doi.org/10.26740/jim.v9n4.p1487-1499.
  10. Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  11. Mardiyana, M., Ihsan, M., Adrial, A., Parida, H., Sidiq, S., & Hidayat, T. (2022). A SWOT (Strength Weakness opportunity and threat) analysis as a strategy to enhance competitiveness. International Journal of Management Science and Application, 1(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.58291/ijmsa.v1i1.8.
  12. Mirza, T. (1997). Balance Scorecard. Usahawan. No. 06 tahun XXVI,1997.
  13. Muchdarsyah, S. (2000). Manajemen Dana Bank. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
  14. Mujiatun, S., Yasin, H., Pratama, K., Fahmi, M., & Jufrizen. (2023). New method of sharia payment platform swot analysis from Indonesia banking sector: Financial indicators impact on financial performance of Islamic Banks. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 15(1), 266–285.
  15. Mulyadi, J. S. (2001). Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  16. Rachmat. (2014). Manajemen Strategik. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  17. Rangkuti, F. (2006). Analisis SWOT dan Teknik dan Strategi Membedah Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.
  18. Rangkuti, F. (2011). Teknik Menyusun Strategi Korporat Yang Efektif Plus Cara Mengelola Kinerja dan Risiko SWOT Balanced Scorecard. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  19. Srivastava, M., Franklin, A., & Martinette, L. (2013). Building a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(2), 47-60.
  20. Sucipto, A. (2008). Penerapan Balanced Scorecard sebagai Indikator Komprehensip Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Sistem Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 2(1), 1-10.
  21. Talebnia, G. (2012). The major perspectives weighted model for balanced scorecard system in the case of auto industries. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(10), 1-9. Undang-Undang No.10 tahun 1998 tentang tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.
  22. Velimirović, D., Velimirović, M., & Stanković, R. (2011). Role and importance of key performance indicators measurement. Serbian Journal of Management, 6(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm1101063V
  23. Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic Management and Business Policy Toward Global Sustainability (13th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. http://portal.belesparadisecollege.edu. et:8080/library/handle/123456789/3245.