Analisis Kecekapan Relatif bagi Industri Saham Amanah Menggunakan Pendekatan Ekonometrik

Authors

  • Nor Azlida Aleng @ Mohamad Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Wan Muhamad Amir Wan Ahmad Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Mustafa Mamat Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Zaidi Isa Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2010.17.1.11

Keywords:

Kecekapan, analisis sempadan stokastik (ASS), Spesifi kasi Batt ese dan Coelli (1992)

Abstract

Makalah ini bertujuan untuk mengukur kecekapan relatif industri saham amanah di Malaysia menggunakan kaedah Analisis Sempadan Stokastik (ASS) bagi tahun 2003 dan 2004 yang terdiri daripada 65 buah dana daripada 16 buah syarikat pengurusan dana saham amanah di Malaysia. Dana yang dikaji dibahagikan kepada tiga jenis, iaitu pertumbuhan, pendapatan dan Islam/Syariah menggunakan spesifi kasi Batt ese dan Coelli (1992). Analisis data dan keputusan kajian menggunakan program Frontier Versi 4.1 (Coelli, 1996). Kecekapan merupakan pengukuran penting yang boleh digunakan untuk menilai perkembangan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi sesebuah negara.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-37.

Battese, G.E., & Corra, G.S. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21, 169-179.

Battese, G.E., & Coelli, T.J. (1992). Frontier production function, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.

Bauer, P.W. (1990). Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 39-56.

Coelli, T.J. (1996). A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. frontier version 4.1: CEPA working paper 96/97, Department of Econometrics, University of New England. IJMS 17 (1), 189-202 (2010) 201

Forsund, F.R., Lovell, C.A.K., & Schmidt, P. (1980). A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement. Journal of Econometrics, 13, 5-25.

Greene, W.H. (1993). The econometric approach efficiency analysis. In www.ijms.uum.edu.my Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K. &, S.S. Schmidt (Eds), The Measurements of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York, 68-119.

Kumbhakar, S.C. (1990). Production frontier, panel data and time-varying technical inefficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 201-211.

Meeusen, W., & Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production function with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.

Norton, R.G. (1999). Investing for income: A bond mutual fund approach to high-return, low-risk profit. New York: McGraw Hill.

Schmidt, P. (1986). Frontier production functions. Econometric Reviews, 4, 289-328.

Sena, V. (2003). The frontier approach to the measurement of productivity and technical efficiency. Economic Issues 8.

Siti Zaleha Feroze Din. (1995). Saham amanah ekuiti perancangan kewangan jangka panjang. Unitra Research Enterprise.

Richmond, J. (1974). Estimating the efficiency of production. International Economic Review, 15, 515-521. 202 IJMS 17 (1), 189-202 (2010)

Downloads

Published

30-06-2010

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2010): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 17, No.1 June 2010

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2010.17.1.11

Most read articles by the same author(s)