The Future of Monetary Reform and the Real Economy: A Problem of Trade Versus Interest

Authors

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury College of Economics and Political Sciences Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat Sultanate of Oman, Oman
  • Sofyan Syafri Harahap Director of Postgraduate Program in Islamic Economics and Finance Trisakti University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2012.19.1.1

Keywords:

Monetary economics, Islamic economics and finance, Islamic political economy and world-system, social economics, ethics and economics

Abstract

The prologue is our starting premise.
 
The Qur’an (2: 275) declares, “As for those who devour interest, they behave as the one whom Satan has confounded with his touch. Seized in this state they say: ‘Trade is but a kind of interest’, even though Allah has made trade lawful, and interest unlawfulâ€.
 
Keynes (1930, p. 368) picked up such wisdom of the inverse relationship between trade and interest and wrote, “The strenuous purposeful moneymakers may carry all of us along with them into the lap of economic abundance. But it will be those peoples, who can keep alive, and cultivate into a fuller perfection, the art of life itself and do not sell themselves for the means of life, who will be able to enjoy the abundance when it comes.â€
 
Such are the messages of moral highness and wisdom picked up in this paper. The fundamental point here is to establish the fact that the only way of phasing out interest rate from Islamic activities is to understand and implement the formalism of the inverse relationship that permanently exists between trade in the good things of life and the rate of interest as the impediment to the free flow of resources into such tradable activities.
 
The central bank and commercial banks and fi nancial intermediaries as practitioners must understand this organic relational concept of intellection in relation to money and the real economy. The monetary system and the real economy with the financial instruments between would thus be shown to formalize the intellection paradigm – which indeed is a truly scientific revolution. The result is replacement of the fractional reserve requirement monetary system by the 100 per cent reserve requirement monetary system backed by the gold standard. Likewise, the organic relationships of such a monetary arrangement including its monetary policy and transmission mechanism would structurally change the nature of markets and its institutional relations and individual preferences. The result at the end will be a phased down interest rate regime into a trade-related one by the rise of the tradable relationships that are generated.
The foundational methodology that enters this kind of organically relational worldview with the episteme of unity of knowledge (the divine law in Islam) provides the functional ontology of the socially and morally constructed money, production and real economy circular causation. It models the legitimacy of trade as the resource mobilization instrument, while rejecting interest as the permanent impediment of resource mobilization.
 
Keywords: Monetary economics, Islamic economics and finance, Islamic political economy and world-system, social economics, ethics and economics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allouche, A. (1994). Mamluk economics, a study and translation of alMaqrizi’s Ighathah. Particularly the chapter on “Currency [Islamic Currency”]. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.

Bank Syariah Mandiri. (2006). Annual Report 2006. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Bank Muamalat. (2007). Annual Report 2007. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Barrow, J. D. (1991). Theories of everything, the quest for ultimate explanation. Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.

Black, S. (1989). Seigniorage. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (Eds.), New palgrave: Money (pp. 314–315). New York: W.W. Norton.

Blackwell, M., & Nocera, S. (1989). Debt-equity swaps. In J. A. Frenkel, M. P. Dooley & P. Wickhman (Eds.), Analytical issues in debt (pp. 311–345). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund. Business Islamica. (March, 2008). Gulf mega-sukuk issues, a ‘rich man’s club. pp. 18–19.

Chapra, M. U. (1985). Towards a just monetary system. Leicester, UK: The Islamic Foundation.

Choudhury, M. A. (1989). Privatisation of the Islamic dinar as an instrument for the development of an Islamic capital market. Islamic economic co-operation (pp. 272–294 ). London: Macmillan.

Choudhury, M. A. (1997). Money in Islam. London, Eng: Routledge.

Choudhury, M. A. (1999). A critique of econometric modeling for development studies: A political economy approach with special reference to Malaysia. In B.N. Ghosh & M.S. Salleh (Eds.), Political economy of development in Malaysia (pp. 105–123). Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications.

Choudhury, M. A. (2006). The principle of complementarities in the Shuratic process and the implications for the socio-scientific order. The Koranic principle of complementarities applied to social and scientific themes (of 5 differently titled volumes), Chapter 1. Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Choudhury, M. A. (2008a). Islamic economics and finance: A fiasco. The Middle East Business and Economic Review, 20(1), 38–51.

Choudhury, M. A. (2008b). Islam versus liberalism: Contrasting epistemological inquiries. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(4), 239–268.

Choudhury, M. A. (2008-2009). Islamic asset valuation by using a terminal-value overlapping generation model, funded internal research project. College of Commerce and Economics, Sultan Qaboos University (mimeo). A part appeared in M.A. http://ijms.uum.edu.my IJMS 19 (1), 1–35 (2012)

Choudhury (2011). Overlapping generation model for Islamic asset valuation: A phenomenological application. Chapter 8 of his Islamic Economics and Finance: An Epistemological Inquiry. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Choudhury, M. A., & Hoque, M. Z. (2004). Micro-money and real economic relationships in the 100 per cent reserve requirement and the gold standard. In their An advanced exposition of Islamic economics and finance (pp. 199–220). Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Choudhury, M. A., & Zaman, Harahap, S. S. (2008). An evolutionary topological theory of participatory socioeconomic development. World Futures, 63, 584–598.

Choudhury, M. A. (2009). Money, finance and the real economy in Islamic banking and finance, perspectives from the Maqasid as-Shari’ah (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Economics, Banking and Finance Program, University of Stirling, Scotland.

Donzelli, F. (2004). Rise and decline of the notion of own rate of interest in Sraffa. Working Paper No. 32. Universita degli Studi di Milano.

Friedman, M. (1968). Real and pseudo gold standards. In his Dollars and deficits (pp. 247–65). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,

Gassner, M. S. (March, 2008). Revisiting Islamic bonds, are 85% of sukuk haram? Business Islamica, 22–23.

Green, R. (1989). Real bills doctrine. In M. Eatwell, Milgate & P. Newman (Eds.), New palgrave: Money (pp. 310–313). New York: W. W. Norton.

Hayek, F. (1976). Choice in currency. Occasional paper 48. London, Eng: Institute of Economic Affairs. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2008, Dec 2). Retrieved from http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp1307.html.

Keynes, J. M. (1963). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. Essays in persuasion (p. 368). New York: W.W. Norton.

Klein, B. (1975). The competing supply of money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 4.

Krugman, P. R. (1989). Market-based debt-reduction schemes. In J. A. Frenkel, M. P Dooley & P. Wickhman (Eds.), Analytical issues in debt (pp. 258–278). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund. Money Matters. Retrieved from http://www.themoneymasters.com.

Mundell, R. A. (2000, Nov 8). Presentation at the economic forum on “One world, one currency: Destination or delusion? Washington D.C: International Monetary Fund.

Parker, M. (2012, Jan 3). Comments on al-Amine. M. al-Bashir’s Global Sukuk and Islamic Securitization Market. Arab News. http://ijms.uum.edu.my IJMS 19 (1), 1–35 (2012)

Ramsay, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of savings. Economic Journal, 543–550.

Rist, C. (1940). History of monetary and credit theory from John Law to the present day. London, UK: Allen Unwin.

Sauer, J. B. (2002). Meaning, method and social science, a realist account. Humanomics: International Journal of Systems and Ethics, 18(3/4) 101–113

Saving, T. R. (1977). A theory of the money supply with competitive banking. Journal of Monetary Economics, 3, 289–303.

Siven, C. (1978). The interaction between multiplier and inflationary processing. In S. Strom & L. Werin (Eds.), Topics in disequilibrium economics. London: Macmillan.

Sraffa, P. (March, 1932). Dr. Hayek on money and capital. Economic Journal, 42.

Tobin, J. (1963). Commercial banks as creators of ‘money’. In D. Carson (Eds), Banking and monetary studies (pp. 408–419). Homewood, ILL: Irwin.

Tullock, G. (1976). Competing moneys. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 7. Usmani, M. T. (n.d). Usmani_Sukuk applications.pdf. Retrieved from http://www.failaka.com

Vogel, E. F., & Hayes, S. L. (1998). Islamic law and finance: Religion, risk and return. Arab and Islamic Law Series, the Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Von, M. L. (1981). The return to sound money. The theory of money and credit. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Chapter 23.

Von, M. L. (1976). The ultimate foundation of economic science. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews & McMeel.

Wicksell, K. (1934). A mathematical analysis of Dr. Akerman’s problem. Readings in mathematical economics: Capital and growth II (pp. 3–28). Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Yeager, L. B. (Spring, 1983). Stable money and free-market currencies. CATO Journal, 305–26.

Yeager, L. B. (1997). The fluttering veil. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2012

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2012): International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS) Vol. 19, No. 1 June 2012

Section

Articles

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2012.19.1.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)