The Family as a Socioeconomic Management System

Authors

  • Masudul Alam Choudhury College of Commerce and Economics Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat Sultanate of Oman, Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.5

Keywords:

Microeconomics of family, socioeconomic management system, inter-generational endogenous preferences, culture and political economy

Abstract

The family is a social miniscule in every culture. It is a central theme of gender-development issue. As such it has a distinct and abiding effect on the nature of the socioeconomic order in terms of preference formation relating to the kinds of artifacts that get exchanged and thus play a key role in socioeconomic development. The totality of these issues comprises the study of the family as a socioeconomic management system. The intergenerational interaction and co-evolution of the family in concert with the social complex is differently explainable in neoclassical economic and Islamic contexts. Consequently, the triangular circular interrelationships between the individual, the household and the socioeconomic order leave different effects in the above two paradigms. These in turn have profound influence on the future of socioeconomic development according to these paradigms. This paper formalizes an interrelationship between the inter-generational family and the socioeconomic order using the concept of circular causation of unity of knowledge in Islam and the methodological individualism in neoclassical economic theory. The inter temporal context of the theme is included with family extensions and their socioeconomic effects over populations of grandfathers and grandchildren.
 
Keywords: Microeconomics of family, socioeconomic management system, inter-generational endogenous preferences, culture and political economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage. Journal of Political Economy, II, 82(2), S11–26. 114 IJMS 18 (1), 99–115 (2011)

Becker, G. S. (1981). Treatise on the family. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Becker, G. S. (1989). Family. In J, Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (Eds.), The new palgrave: Social economics (pp. 64-76). New York: W.W. Norton.

Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). The F connection: families, friends, and firms http://ijms.uum.edu.my and the organization of exchange. Population and Development Review, 6(1), 1–30.

Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Modeling the individual for constitutional analysis. In The reason of rules, constitutional political economy (pp. 53–74). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

Choudhury, M.A. (1995). The Qur’anic derivation of the epistemic-ontic circular causation model. In his The epistemological foundations of Islamic economic, social and scientific order, Vol. 4, Chapter 3, (Ankara, Turkey: Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Center for Islamic Countries.

Choudhury, M. A. (1996). A theory of social systems: Family and ecology as examples. Kybernetes: International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 25(5), 21–38.

Debreu, G. (1959). Mathematics. In Theory of value, Chapter 1, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Choudhury, M. A. (1999). A philosophico-mathematical theorem on unity of knowledge. Kybernetes: International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, 28(6/7), 763–776

Sen, A. (1985). The moral standing of the market. In E.F. Paul. Jr., F.D. Miller, & J. Paul (Eds.), Ethics and economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Sztompka, P. (1991). The model of social becoming. In Society in action: The theory of social becoming (pp. 87–199). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Imam] Shatibi (trans. A. Draz) undated. Al-Muafaqat Fil Usul Al-Shari’ah, Cairo, Egypt: Al-Maktabah Al-Tijariyyah Al-Qubra. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 1997-2000 annual issues. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2000). World Development Report 2000–2001. New York: Oxford University Press. IJMS 18 (1), 99–115 (2011) 115

Downloads

Published

30-06-2011

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2011.18.1.5

Most read articles by the same author(s)