Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions between Industrialized and Developing Countries: US and Indian Merger Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2011.8.1.3Keywords:
Cross border mergers and acquisitions, Acquirer’s abnormal returns, Target’s abnormal returns, Publicly traded acquirers, Privately held targetsAbstract
References
Aybar B. & Ficici A. (2009). Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1317-1338.
Baldwin J. R. & Caves, R. E. (1991). Foreign multinational enterprises and merger activity in Canada. In L. Waverman (Ed.). Corporate globalization through mergers and acquisitions. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 89-122.
Bargeron, L., Schlingemann, F. P., Stulz, R. M. & Zutter, C. J. (2008). Why do private acquirers pay so little compared to public acquirers? Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 375-390.
Cakici N., Hassel, C. & Tandon, K. (1996). Foreign acquisitions in the United States: Effect on shareholder wealth of foreign acquiring firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 307-329.
Caves, R. E. (1971). International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38, 1-27.
Caves, R. E. (1998). Research on international business: Problems and prospects. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 5-19.
Chari, A., Ouimet, P. & Tesar, L. (2010). The value of control in emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming.
Conn, R. L., Cosh, A., Guest, P. M. & Hughes, A. (2005). Impact on UK acquirers of domestic, cross-border, public and private acquisitions. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 32, 815-870. Karels et al.: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K. & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 57, 1951-1979.
Doukas, J., (1995). Overinvestment, Tobin’s q and gains from foreign acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 19, 1285-1303.
Doukas, J. & Travlos, N. G. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 43, 1161-1175.
Eckbo, B. E. & Thorburn, K. S. (2000). Gains to bidder firms revisited: Domestic and foreign acquisitions in the US. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 1-24.
Eun, C. S., Kolodny, R. & Scherga, C. (1996). Cross-border acquisitions and shareholder wealth: Tests of the synergy and internalization hypothesis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1559-1582.
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I. & Sun, X. (2008). Financial market integration and the value of global diversification: Evidence for acquirers in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1522-1540.
Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B. & Chittor, R. (2010). Do international acquisitions by emerging economy forms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. forthcoming in the International Journal of Business Studies.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. & Ireland, D.R. (2001). A mid-range theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance. Journal of Management, 20, 297-326.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M. & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 479-491.
Kissin, W. D. & Herrera, J. (1990). International mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Strategy, 11, 51-54.
Kiymaz, H. (2004). Cross-border acquisitions of financial institutions: impact of macroeconomic factors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 1413-1439.
Kogut, B. (1983). Managing political risk assessment. Sloan Management Review, 24, 71-73.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27.
Markides, C. C. & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: Evidence from U.S. international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 343-366.
Markides, C. & Oyon, D. (1998). International acquisitions: Do they create value for shareholders? European Management Journal,16, 125-135.
Megginson, W. L., Morgan, A. & Nail, L. (2004). The determinants of positive long-term performance in strategic mergers: Corporate focus and cash. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 523-52.
Mitchell, M. L. & Stafford, E. (2000). Managerial decisions and long-term stock price performance. Journal of Business, 73, 287-329.
Moeller, S. B. & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73, 201-228.
Moeller, S. B. & Schlingemann, F. P. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 533-564.
Morck, R. A. & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64, 165-187.
Morck, R. A. & Yeung, B. (1992). Internalization: An event-study test. Journal of International Economics, 33, 41-56.
Mulherin, J. H. & Audra L. B. (2000). Comparing acquisitions and divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 117-139.
Rossi, S. & Volpin P. F. (2004). Cross-country determinants of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 277-304.
Seth, A., Song, K. P. & Pettit, R. (2002). Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: An empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 921-940.
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.









