The Dynamics of Credit Quality and Implications for The Pricing of Small Business Loans

Authors

  • Adrian M. Cowan St. Mary’s University, San Antonio and The University of Alabama, Birmingham, United States
  • Charles D. Cowan The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2008.5.2.2

Keywords:

Credit scoring, Loan pricing, Small business lending, Basel II

Abstract

We analyze the implications of the dynamics of credit scores for small businesses; strategies for banks to maximize revenues; and Basel II minimum capital requirements on loan pricing for loans to small firms that do not have access to capital markets. Relating dynamic changes in the competitive environment to pricing decisions also provides a contribution to the literature. A theoretical model is developed to investigate the differences between relationship and transactional lending to small businesses in the context of these factors in the banking industry. The model demonstrates that in highly competitive markets, each type of lender occupies overlapping spaces, and can be simultaneously attractive to different types of borrowers if banks take advantage of their knowledge of the dynamics.

 

References

Akhavein, J., Frame, W.S., and White, L J., (2005). The diffusion of financial innovation: An examination of the adoption of small business credit scoring by large banking organizations. Journal of Business, 28, 577-596.

Allen, F., Caaretti, E., and Marquez, R., (2006). Credit market competition and capital regulation. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2006-11.

Berger, A. N., (2004). Potential competitive effects of Basel II on Banks in SME Credit Markets in the United States. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board,

Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2004-12.

Berger, A.N., Rosen, R.J., and Udell, G.F., (2001). Does market size structure affect competition? The case of small business lending. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board.

Berger, A.N., and Udell, G.F., (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business, 68, 351-381.

Berger, A.N., and Udell, G.F., (1996). Universal banking and the future of small business lending. A. Saunders and I. Walter ed: Financial system design: The case for universal banking. Irwin Publishing, Burr Ridge, IL, 559-627.

Berger, A.N., and Udell, G.F., (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organizational structure. Economic Journal, 112, 32-53.

Berlin, M., and Mester, L.J., (1998). On the profitability and cost of relationship lending. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 873-897.

Blöchlinger, A., and Leippold, M., (2006). Economic benefit of powerful credit scoring. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 851-873.

Boot, A.W.A., and Thakor, A.V., (1994). Moral hazard and secured lending in an infinitely repeated credit market game. International Economic Review, 35, 899-920.

Boot, A.W.A., and Thakor, A.V., (2000). Can relationship banking survive competition? Journal of Finance, 55, 679-713.

Carter, D.A., McNulty, J.E., and Verbrugge, J.A., (2004). Do small banks have an advantage in lending? An examination of risk-adjusted yields on business loans at large and small banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 25, 233-252.

Cetorelli, N., and Gambera, M., (2001). Banking market structure, financial dependence and growth: International evidence from industry data. Journal of Finance, 56, 617-648.

Cole, R.A., Goldberg, L.G., and White, L.J., (2004). Cookie cutter vs. character: The microstructure of small business lending by large and small banks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39, 227-251.

Cowan, C. D., and Cowan, A. M., (2006). A Survey Based Assessment of Financial Institution Use of Credit Scoring for Small Business Lending. Research Study, Banking and Financial Economic Research, Small Business Association Office of Advocacy.

Diamond, D.W., (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 393-414.

Diamond, D.W., (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 689-721.

Diamond, D.W., (1996). Financial intermediation as delegated monitoring: A simple example. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 82, 51-66.

Frame, W.S., Srinivasan, A., and Woosley, L., (2001). The effect of credit scoring on small business lending. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33, 813825.

Greenbaum, S.I., Kanatas, G., and Venezia, I., (1989). Equilibrium loan pricing under the bank-client relationship. Journal of Banking and Finance, 221235.

Mester, L.J., (1997). What’s the point of credit scoring. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 3-16.

Petersen, M.A., and Rajan, R.G., (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49, 3-37.

Petersen, M.A., and Rajan, R.G., (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 407-443.

Rajan, R.G., (1992). Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm’s-length debt. The Journal of Finance, 47, 1367-1400.

Ramakrishnan, S., and Thakor, A.V., (1984). Information reliability and a theory of financial intermediation. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 415-432.

Repullo, R., and Suarez, J., (2004). Loan pricing under Basel capital requirements. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 496-521.

Sharpe, S.A., (1990). Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. The Journal of Finance, 45, 1069-1087.

Downloads

Published

18-08-2008

How to Cite

Cowan, A. M., & Cowan, C. D. (2008). The Dynamics of Credit Quality and Implications for The Pricing of Small Business Loans. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 5(2), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2008.5.2.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijbf2008.5.2.2 OpenAlex W2991688691