Unravelling the Interplay Between ESG-Linked Executive Compensation, Board Climate Oversight, and Carbon Disclosure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2026.21.2.8Keywords:
ESG-Linked executive compensation, board climate oversight, carbon disclosure, ChinaAbstract
This study explores whether ESG-linked executive compensation influences carbon reporting by China's A-share listed firms and whether this influence is mediated by board-level climate governance. Based on stakeholder theory, agency theory, and upper echelons theory, the study suggests that ESG-linked executive compensation positively affects carbon disclosure quality and that board-level climate governance mediates this relationship, reinforcing the effect of ESG-linked incentives on disclosure practices. The study of firm-level panel data spanning 2021 to 2023 indicates that companies with ESG-linked executive compensation tend to have credible and transparent carbon disclosures. Furthermore, ESG-linked executive compensation pushes companies to establish board climate oversight, and board climate oversight helps the quality of disclosure outcomes. The findings show that board climate oversight functions as a mediator that connects ESG-linked executive compensation with carbon disclosure practices. The mediation results show that ESG-linked executive compensation affects carbon reporting through two separate channels. Board climate oversight is seen as the governing mechanism that connects the two channels. The results of this research suggest that investors, regulators and boards can consider readjusting their climate practices in response to new regulatory requirements.
References
Abbas, A., Zhang, G., Bilal, & Chengang, Y. (2023). Firm governance structures, earnings management, and carbon emission disclosures in Chinese high‐polluting firms. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1470–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12582
Adam, A. A., Salleh, Z., Alahdal, W. M., Hussien, A. M., Bajaher, M., & Baatwah, S. R. (2024). The effect of the board of directors, audit committee, and institutional ownership on carbon disclosure quality: The moderating effect of environmental committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2254–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3058
Akbaş, H. E., & Canikli, S. (2019). Determinants of voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure: An empirical investigation on Turkish firms. Sustainability, 11(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11010107
Ali, W., Wilson, J., & Frynas, J. G. (2024). Corporate governance mechanisms and carbon disclosure: A multilevel and multitheory literature survey. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5670–5689. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2869
Alodat, A. Y., & Hao, Y. (2025). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3126
Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2019). CEO compensation and sustainability reporting assurance: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3735-8
Amara, T., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). The ESG performance in relation to the board of directors’ characteristics, sustainability incentives compensation, and CSR committee: A cross-national study. Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35609/ gcbssproceeding.2022.2(23)
Ashraf, S., Alodat, A. Y., & Zeitun, R. M. A. (2025). The impact of board gender diversity on environmental innovation and the mediating role of the CSR committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3590–3601. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3133
Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Wiley.
Baraibar-Diez, E., & Odriozola, M. D. (2019). CSR committees and their effect on ESG performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain. Sustainability, 11(18), 5077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185077 Baraibar‐Diez, E., Odriozola, M. D., & Fernández Sánchez, J. L. (2019). Sustainable compensation policies and its effect on environmental, social, and governance scores. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1760
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bebchuk, L. A., & Tallarita, R. (2022). The perils and questionable promise of ESG-based compensation. Journal of Corporation Law, 48, 37–75. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4048003
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461950
Bui, B., Houqe, M. N., & Zaman, M. (2020). Climate governance effects on carbon disclosure and performance. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100880
Cahyono, S., Harymawan, I., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Noman, A. H. M. (2024). Corporate business strategy, CEO’s managerial ability, and environmental disclosure: The perspective of stakeholder theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 8149–8189. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3894
Cai, R., Lv, T., & Deng, X. (2021). Evaluation of environmental information disclosure of listed companies in China’s heavy pollution industries: A text mining-based methodology. Sustainability, 13(10), 5415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105415
Chen, H., Wu, X., & Zhang, M. (2024). Does a coin have only two sides? The inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate digital transformation and carbon information disclosure and its flip-flopping. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, Part A, 1324–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.iref.2024.04.008
Chen, Y., Feng, Y., Lai, K.-H., & Zhu, Q. (2025). Value of blockchain for scope 3 carbon disclosure: The moderating role of data processing technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 279, 109445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109445
Chen, Y., Zhu, X., Xiong, X., Zhang, C., & Huang, J. (2023). Who discloses carbon information? The joint role of ownership and factor market distortion. Management Decision, 61(8), 2391–2412. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2021-1050
Cohen, S., Kadach, I., & Ormazabal, G. (2023a). Institutional investors, climate disclosure, and carbon emissions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 76(2-3), 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jacceco.2023.101640
Cohen, S., Kadach, I., Ormazabal, G., & Reichelstein, S. (2023b). Executive compensation tied to ESG performance: International evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3), 805–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12481
Comello, S. D., Reichelstein, J., & Reichelstein, S. (2023). Corporate carbon reporting: Improving transparency and accountability. One Earth, 6(7), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.06.002
Cordova, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, P. (2021). Contextual and corporate governance effects on carbon accounting and carbon performance in emerging economies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-20200473
Cosma, S., Principale, S., & Venturelli, A. (2022). Sustainable governance and climate-change disclosure in European banking: The role of the corporate social responsibility committee. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(6), 1345–1369. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-092021-0331
CSMAR. (2025). CSMAR database. https://data.csmar.com/
Dan, E., & Shen, J. (2022). Establishment of corporate energy management systems and voluntary carbon information disclosure in Chinese listed companies: The moderating role of corporate leaders’ lowcarbon awareness. Sustainability, 14(5), 2714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052714
Daniels, L., & Minot, N. (2025). An introduction to statistics and data analysis using Stata: From research design to final report. SAGE Publications.
Dell’Erba, M., & Ferrarini, G. (2024). ESG & executive remuneration in Europe. European Business Organization Law Review, 25(3), 439–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00318-5
Derchi, G.-B., Zoni, L., & Dossi, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility performance, incentives, and learning effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 617–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-02004556-8
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr. 1995.9503271992
Eklund, M. A., & Pinheiro, P. (2024). The determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee: Executive compensation, CSR-based incentives and ESG performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(7), 1240–1255. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2022-0303
Eliwa, Y., Saleh, A., & Ahmed, A. H. (2025). Aligning pay with purpose: ESG‐linked compensation and ESG decoupling. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(2), 1805–1829. https://doi.org/10.1002/ bse.70258
Elmaghrabi, M. E. (2021). CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 892–919. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0036
Everitt, B. S. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2006). Handbook of statistical analyses using Stata (4nd ed.). CRC Press.
Flammer, C., Hong, B., & Minor, D. (2019). Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1097–1122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3018
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. García‐Sánchez, I.- M., Ali, R., & Rehman, R. U. (2023). Is there a complementary or a substitutive relationship between climate governance and analyst coverage? Its effect on climate disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3445–3464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3310
Gennari, F. (2019). How to lead the board of directors to a sustainable development of business with the CSR committees. Sustainability, 11(24), 6987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246987
Guo, W., Mo, B., Chen, Y., & Huang, Z. (2025). Value-enhancing effect of climate change risk disclosure by firms: Empirical evidence based on textual analysis and machine learning. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 61(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2024.2381556
Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. McGraw Hill.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Executive compensation, sustainable compensation policy, carbon performance and market value. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12395
Heubeck, T., & Ahrens, A. (2024). Governing the responsible investment of slack resources in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: How beneficial are CSR committees? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05798-6
Honey, D., Ahsan, T., & Migliori, S. (2025). The impact of governance quality on corporate climate risk disclosure: The role of the governance committee. International Review of Financial Analysis, 98, 103901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103901
Huld, A. (2022, February 23). China ESG reporting—Disclosing enterprise environmental information. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-esg-reporting-disclosing-enterprise-environ mental-information/
Issa, S. O., Alabi, A. T., & Ubandawaki, A. T. (2025). Climate change governance, Shariah governance quality, and financed emission mitigation: Evidence from Islamic banks in Southeast and West Asia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(4), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2025.03.011
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304405X(76)90026-X
Keddie, S. L., & Magnan, M. (2023). Are ESG performance-based incentives a panacea or a smokescreen for excess compensation? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(3), 591–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2022-0605
Kennedy, P. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons.
KPMG. (2024a). China stock exchanges mandate sustainability report for larger listed entities.
KPMG. (2024b). The move to mandatory reporting: Survey of sustainability reporting 2024.
KPMG. (2024c). Time to take a broader view: Why sustainability-linked executive pay is a work in progress.
KPMG. (2025). Incentivizing long-term value creation.
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz137
Kubo, K., & Sasaki, R. (2024). The impact of a CSR committee on CSR performance. Japan and the World Economy, 71, 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2024.101269
Lewa, E. M., Gatimbu, K. K., & Kariuki, P. W. (2025). Sustainability reporting in sub-Sharan Africa: Does audit committee diversity and executive compensation matter? Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11, 101262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101262
Li, T., Zeng, S., Wu, S., & Peng, Q. (2024). Construction of a corporate carbon disclosure indicator system and quality evaluation: Evidence from resource-based listed companies. Sustainability, 17(1), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010100
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bar.2014.01.002
Liu, Z., & Wu, J. (2024). Evaluation index system for carbon information disclosure quality in China’s electric power sector based on a mutual information and back propagation neural network model. Utilities Policy, 89, 101781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2024.101781
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.
LSEG Workspace. (n.d.). LSEG DATA & ANALYTICS. https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/products/ workspace
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate governance and carbon performance: Role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk. Accounting & Finance, 61(2), 2891–2934. https://doi.org/10.1111/ acfi.12687
Luo, L., Wu, H., & Zhang, C. (2021). CEO compensation, incentive alignment, and carbon transparency. Journal of International Accounting Research, 20(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2020032
Luo, X., Zhang, R., & Wang, J. (2022). Product market competition and carbon disclosure: Evidence from China. Carbon Management, 13(1), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2022.2100830
Mahmoudian, F., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2022). Sustainability control system components, reporting and performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(4), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0208
Mardawi, Z., Dwekat, A., Meqbel, R., & Carmona Ibáñez, P. (2024). Configurational analysis of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility reporting assurance: Understanding the role of board and CSR committee. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(2), 512–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/
MEDAR-04-2022-1654 Martínez‐Ferrero, J., Lozano, M. B., & Vivas, M. (2021). The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm’s commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2080
MEE. (2022). China’s administrative measures for the legal disclosure of enterprise environmental information. Ministry of Ecology and Environment. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/ xxgk02/202112/t20211221_964837.html
Meng, T., Lu, D., Yu, D., Yahya, M. H., & Zariyawati, M. A. (2024). Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1560. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599 -024-04094-y
Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
Mnif, Y., & Kchaou, J. (2023). Through the rhetoric art: CEO incentives in sustainability sensitive industries. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(3), 576–601. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2021-1451
Monteiro, A. P., Cepêda, C., Borges, A. P., & Vieira, E. (2025). Does CSR committee presence, stakeholder engagement, gender equality (SDG 5) and firm value influence ESG performance reporting? An EU pre and during Covid-19 analysis. Measuring Business Excellence, 29(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-03-2024-0034
Morrison, E. A., Adu, D. A., & Guo, Y. (2024). Executive compensation, sustainable business practices and firm performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Accounting Literature. 48(1), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-03-2023-0040
OECD. (2025). Board responsibility and sustainability-related disclosure in Asia. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d2672e7-en
Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2354
Park, J., Lee, J., & Shin, J. (2023). Corporate governance, compensation mechanisms, and voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 19(3), 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100361
Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2015). The association between sustainability governance characteristics and the assurance of corporate sustainability reports. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50849
PwC. (2024). Guidelines on self-regulation of listed companies—Sustainability report (trial) of the people’s Republic of China.
Radu, C., & Smaili, N. (2022). Alignment versus monitoring: An examination of the effect of the CSR committee and CSR-linked executive compensation on CSR performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04904-2
Ratti, S., Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Dell’Agostino, L. (2023). Environmental claims and executive compensation plans: Is there a link? An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, 138434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138434
Samarawickrama, D., Biswas, P. K., & Roberts, H. (2024). Mandatory CSR regulations and social disclosure: The mediating role of the CSR committee. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(4), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2023-1950
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266177 22882
Shahrour, M. H., Arouri, M., Tran, D. V., & Rao, S. (2024). Carbon consciousness: The influence of CEO ownership. Journal of Environmental Management, 364, 121455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman. 2024.121455
Shen, H., Zheng, S., Adams, J., & Jaggi, B. (2020). The effect stakeholders have on voluntary carbon disclosure within Chinese business organizations. Carbon Management, 11(5), 455–472. https://doi.org/10. 1080/17583004.2020.1805555
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
Tan, D., Bilal, Gao, S., & Komal, B. (2020). Impact of carbon emission trading system participation and level of internal control on quality of carbon emission disclosures: Insights from Chinese state-owned electricity companies. Sustainability, 12(5), 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051788
Tingbani, I., Chithambo, L., Tauringana, V., & Papanikolaou, N. (2020). Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2194–2210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2495
Torres, P. (2024). Configurations of corporate governance mechanisms and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 2900–2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2729
Toukabri, M. (2025). Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) power and sustainability-based compensation for climate change disclosure and carbon performance: Is it different for developed and developing nations? Society and Business Review, 20(1), 52–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2023-0356
UNESCO. (2023, April 20). From publications to policy: China launches world’s largest carbon market.
UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris Agreement.
Velte, P. (2022). Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1655–1670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2333
Velte, P. (2024a). Archival research on sustainability‐related executive compensation. A literature review of the status quo and future improvements. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3119–3147. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2741
Velte, P. (2024b). Climate board governance and carbon assurance – European evidence. Journal of Global Responsibility, 16(3), 594–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-02-2024-0034
Velte, P. (2024c). Sustainable board governance and environmental performance: European evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3397–3421. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3654
Velte, P. (2024d). Sustainable board governance and sustainable supply chain reporting: European evidence. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2023-0189
Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2020). Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings. Journal of Management Control, 31, 333–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00308-x
Veltri, S., Latella, P., & Ricciardi, A. (2025). ESG-based executive compensation: State of art and future research directions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(8), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2024-0284
Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2020). Corporate governance, integrated reporting and the use of credibilityenhancing mechanisms on integrated reports. European Accounting Review, 29(4), 631–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1668281
Wenhao, M., Jaidi, J., & Mohidin, R. (2022). Board independence, corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2022.17.1.5
World Health Organization. (2023, October 12). Climate change.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Xinhua. (2021, April 22). China to control, phase down coal consumption in next decade: Xi. China Daily.
Yuriev, A., & Boiral, O. (2024). Sustainability in the boardroom: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 41187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141187
Zhang, N., & Li, D. (2025, February 6). How China’s listed firms can accelerate emission disclosures. Dialogue Earth.
Zhu, N., Wiredu, I., Agyemang, A. O., & Osei, A. (2024). Addressing corporate governance and carbon accounting disclosure gaps: A path toward firms’ commitment to sustainable development goal 13. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5421–5436. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2955
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-20Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
