The Link Between ESG, Firm’s Financial and Market Performance in Malaysia: The Moderating Role of Firm Size, Index Recognition, and Shariah Compliance

Authors

  • Mohammad Ali Tareq Department of Finance, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Chong He Ong Faculty of Business & Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Asyraf Abdul Halim Department of Finance, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2026.21.2.2

Keywords:

ESG performance, firm performance, Shariah compliance, FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia index, Malaysian stock exchange

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and firm performance among 338 firms (747 firm-year observations) listed on Bursa Malaysia from 2018 to 2023. Using a fixed-effects panel regression approach, the analysis evaluates the direct impact of ESG performance on financial performance, measured by return on equity (ROE), and market performance, measured by Tobin’s Q (TQ). The results show that ESG performance alone does not significantly enhance firm outcomes, with ESG scores displaying a significant negative association with market valuation, suggesting that the high costs and complexities of implementing ESG initiatives may outweigh short-term benefits in investor assessments. Firm-specific characteristics are found to moderate the ESG - performance relationship. Larger firms show weaker market outcomes when ESG engagement is high, reflecting delayed returns and greater implementation challenges. In contrast, external validation through inclusion in the FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia Index (F4GBM) positively moderates the ESG-TQ relationship, underscoring the importance of recognition by sustainability indices in strengthening market confidence whereas Shariah compliance does not exhibit significant moderating effects. The findings highlight the multifaceted and context-dependent nature of ESG outcomes in Malaysia, offering valuable implications for firms, investors, and regulators seeking to align sustainability with financial and market success.

References

Ab Aziz, N. H., Alshdaifat, S. M., & Al Amosh, H. (2025). ESG Controversies and firm performance in ASEAN: Do board gender diversity and sustainability committee matter? Business Strategy & Development, 8(1), e70094. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70094

Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1409-1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-06-2020-0258

Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494.

Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00149.x

Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486. 2006.00597.x

Brighi, P., Della Bina, A. C. F., & Venturelli, V. (2025). Firm value and risk: How relevant are ESG factors and ESG controversies? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2024-0953

Bruna, M. G., Loprevite, S., Raucci, D., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2022). Investigating the marginal impact of ESG results on corporate financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102828

Bursa Malaysia. (2024, June 17). FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia (F4GBM) Index.

Bursa Malaysia. (2018). Sustainability Reporting Guide (2nd ed.).

Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. irfa.2022.102291

Chua, I. V., Zakaria, Z., Arumugam, V., & Ismail, M. R. (2023). The impact of environmental, social, governance (ESG) disclosure on financial performance of listed healthcare companies in Bursa Malaysia: A panel data study. International Journal of Business, Marketing and Communication, 3(2), 1-11.

Clyde & Co. (2024, August 19). ESG challenges in emerging markets.

Deloitte. (2022, February 8). Incorporating ESG: Living up to stakeholder expectations and business opportunities.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10. 2307/258887

Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

Eccles, R. G., & Youmans, T. (2015). Implied materiality and material disclosures of credit ratings. (Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper No. 15-079). Harvard Business School.

Fang, V. W., Noe, T. H., & Tice, S. (2009). Stock market liquidity and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 150-169.

Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.

Grimaldi, F., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., & Mariani, M. (2020). Sustainability engagement and earnings management: The Italian context. Sustainability, 12(12), 4881. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4881

Han, J.-J., Kim, H. J., & Yu, J. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1), 61-76.

Handoyo, S., & Anas, S. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on firm performance: The moderating role of country regulatory quality and government effectiveness in ASEAN. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2371071. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23311975.2024.2371071

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1251-1271.

HMSA Consultancy. (2023, November 15). Short-term profitability vs. long-term sustainability.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate sustainability: A strategy? (Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper No. 19-065). Harvard Business School.

Jamal, S., Malik, F., & Ahmad, W. (2021). ESG and financial performance in the case of Malaysia. Global Management Sciences Review, VI, 33-53. https://doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2021(VI-III).03

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-405X(76)90026-X

Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610267

Lee, S.-P., & Isa, M. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and financial performance of Shariah-compliant companies in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(2), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-06-2020-0183

Maveric Systems. (2025, February 9). The cost of ESG transformation: A strategic investment for long-term value.

Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030574

Mohammad, A., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2024). Nexus between ESG practice and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies.

Mohammad, W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015

Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Mamode Khan, N. (2022). The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 953-985. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-07-2021-0298

Olsen, B. C., Awuah-Offei, K., & Bumblauskas, D. (2021). Setting materiality thresholds for ESG disclosures: A case study of U. S. mine safety disclosures. Resources Policy, 70, 101914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101914

Ooi, C. A., Lu, M. P., & Zulkafli, A. H. (2024). Corporate risk‐taking, economic policy uncertainty and ESG performance: International evidence. Business Strategy & Development, 7(4), e70028.

Standard Chartered. (2020). The overlaps between Islamic and ESG investing.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.

Sukor, M. E. A., & Abdul Halim, A. (2022). Theory and evidence of the impacts of Shariah debt screening on firm behaviour. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(8), 1137-1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-01-2022-0016

Suttipun, M. (2023). ESG performance and corporate financial risk of the alternative capital market in Thailand. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2168290. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975. 2023.2168290

The Financial Analyst. (2024). Emerging EU markets face ESG rating confusion amid investor skepticism.

Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2016-0029

Wang, K., Li, T., San, Z., & Gao, H. (2023). How does corporate ESG performance affect stock liquidity? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 80, 102087. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pacfin.2023.102087

Whelan, T., Atz, U., Van Holt, T., & Clark, C. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Uncovering the relationship by aggregating evidence from 1,000 plus studies published between 2015–2020. New York: NYU STERN Center for Sustainable Business, 520-536.

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3635

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Tareq, M. A., Ong, C. H., & Abdul Halim, A. (2026). The Link Between ESG, Firm’s Financial and Market Performance in Malaysia: The Moderating Role of Firm Size, Index Recognition, and Shariah Compliance. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(2), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2026.21.2.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-27
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijbf2026.21.2.2 OpenAlex W7171391400