Forecasting the Realized Volatility of Islamic Equities Using Multivariate Har-Type Models

Authors

  • Ng Sew Lai Multimedia University, Malaysia
  • Chin Wen Cheong School of Mathematics and Physics, Xiamen University Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Chong Lee Lee School Accounting & Finance, Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation, Malaysia
  • Ng Kok Why Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Multimedia University, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2025.20.1.3

Keywords:

realized volatility, volatility forecasting, multivariate heterogeneous autoregressive model, Islamic stock markets

Abstract

This study proposes nine multivariate intraday models using various realized variation measures with the aim to improve volatility forecasting in the Islamic stock market in Malaysia using a dataset from 1st April 2008 to 31st March 2018. The findings show that considering independently the jump-robust realized volatility, additional daily jump realized volatility, and continuous and discontinuous jump sample path variations improved the in-sample predictive regressions compared to using the standard realized volatility. For the out-of-sample volatility forecasts evaluation, it is observed that the volatility models that disentangled the realized volatility into its continuous and discontinuous jump components have outperformed the rest of the proposed models. This is because both the continuous and discontinuous variation of returns exhibit distinctive substantial information in yielding the final volatility dynamic and thus should be modeled disjointedly. However, the empirical results suggest that the simple autoregressive specification using the standard realized volatility is often performing better or as well as the new extension models. Lastly, this study may provide useful insight in portfolio management, risk assessment, and asset pricing, particularly in the Shariah-compliant equities.

References

Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 885-905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527343

Andersen, T. G., & Todorov, V. (2010). Realized volatility and multipower variation. In R. Cont (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quantitative finance (pp. 1494-1500). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9780470061602.eqf19020

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2001). The distribution of realized stock return volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(1), 43-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00055-1

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. X. (2007). Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling and forecasting of return volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.701

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Dobrev, D. (2007). No-arbitrage semi-martingale restrictions for continuous-time volatility models subject to leverage effects, jumps and IID noise: Theory and testable distributional implications. Journal of Econometrics, 138(1), 125-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.018

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., & Huang, X. (2011). A reduced form framework for modelling volatility of speculative prices based on realized variation measures. Journal of Econometrics, 160(1), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.029

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Labys, P. (1999). Understanding, optimizing, using and forecasting realized volatility and correlation (pp. 105-108). Northwestern University, Duke University and University of Pennsylvania, Working Paper. Published in revised form as “Great Realizations” in Risk. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/nystfi/99-061.html

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X., & Labys, P. (2003). Modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Econometrica, 71(2), 579-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00418

Andersen, T. G., Dobrev, D., & Schaumburg, E. (2012). Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbour truncation. Journal of Econometrics, 169(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jeconom.2012.01.011

Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2002). Estimating quadratic variation using realised volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(5), 457-477. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4129267

Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2004b). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbh001

Bergsli, L.Ø., Lind, A. F., Molnár, P., & Polasik, M. (2022). Forecasting volatility of bitcoin. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101540

Bollerslev, T. (1986). General Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

Bollerslev, T., Kretschmer, U., Pigorsch, C., & Tauchen, G. (2009). A discrete-time model for daily S&P500 returns and realized variations: Jumps and leverage effects. Journal of Econometrics, 150(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.001

Bollerslev, T., Li, S. Z., & Todorov, V. (2016). Roughing up beta: Continuous versus discontinuous betas and the cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(3), 464-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.001

Bubák, V., Kočenda, E., & Žikeš, F. (2011). Volatility transmission in emerging European foreign exchange markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 2829–2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbankfin.2011.03.012

Chen, Cathy W. S., Watanabe, T., & Lin, Edward M. H. (2021). Bayesian estimation of realized GARCH-type Models with application to financial tail risk management. Econometrics and Statistics, 28, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.03.006

Chin, W. C., Lee, M. C., & Grace Lee, C. Y. (2016). Heterogeneous autoregressive model with structural break using nearest neighbour truncation volatility estimators for DAX. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3465-x

Choi, K. W., Yu, W. C., & Zivot, E. (2010). Long memory versus structural breaks in modeling and forecasting realized volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(5), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.12.001

Christensen, K., Oomen, R., & Podolskij, M. (2010). Realised quantile-based estimation of the integrated variance. Journal of Econometrics, 159(1), 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jeconom.2010.04.008

Corsi, F. (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometric, 7(2), 174-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbp001

Corsi, F., Pirino, D., & Renò, R. (2010). Threshold bi-power variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting. Journal of Econometrics, 159(2), 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jeconom.2010.07.008

Degiannakis, S., & Floros, C. (2016). Intra-day realized volatility for European and USA stock indices. Global Finance Journal, 29, 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2015.05.002

Degiannakis, S., Filis, G., Klein, T., & Walther, T. (2022). Forecasting realized volatility of agricultural commodities. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijforecast.2019.08.011

Dobrev, D., & Szerszen, P. (2010). The information content of high-frequency data for estimating equity return models and forecasting risk. Working paper 1005, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US). https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedgif/1005.html

Dudek, G., Fiszeder, P., Kubus, P., & Orzeszko, W. (2023). Forecasting cryptocurrencies volatility using statistical and machine learning methods: A comparative study. SSRN.

Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111132

Ewing, B. T., & Malik, F. (2016). Volatility spillovers between oil prices and the stock market under structural breaks. Global Finance Journal, 29, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2015.04.008

Ferrari, M., Kearns, J., & Schrimpf, A. (2021). Monetary policy’s rising FX impact in the era of ultra-low rates. Journal of Banking & Finance, 129, 106-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin. 2021.106142

Fuertes, A. M., & Olmo, J. (2012). Exploiting intraday and overnight price variation for daily VaR prediction. Frontiers in Finance and Economics, 9(2), 1-31. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=2190403

Gao, Y., Zhao, C. J., Sun, B. X., & Zhao, W. D., (2022). Effects of investor sentiment on stock volatility: New evidences from multi‑source data in China’s green stock markets. Financial Innovation, 8(77), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00381-2

Garcia, J. A. C., & Hill, J. B. (2017). A three-component volatility model with truncated high-frequency measures. Working paper. http://jalfonsocampillog.web.unc.edu/research/

Gong, X., & Lin, B. Q. (2019). Modeling stock market volatility using new HAR-type models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 516, 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physa.2018.10.013

Iftekhar, H. C., Faruk, B., & Anne, D. B. (2022). Islamic equity markets versus their conventional counterparts in the COVID‐19 age: Reaction, resilience, and recovery. International Review of Finance, 22(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12349 Islamic Finance Development Indicator (IFDI, 2022). ICD-refinitive Islamic finance development report 2022: Embracing change. https://icd-ps.org/uploads/files/ICD%20Refinitiv%20ifdi-report-20221669878247_1582.pdf

Jian Zhou (2020). A comparison of realized measures for daily REIT volatility. Journal of Property Research 27(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2019.1693418

Li, J., Todorov, V., & Tauchen, G. (2017). Jump regressions. Econometrica, 85(1), 173-195. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44155420

Liu, L., & Wang, Y. D. (2021). Forecasting aggregate market volatility: The role of good and bad uncertainties. Journal of Forecasting, 40(1), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2694

Luo, J. W., & Ji, Q. (2018). High-frequency volatility connectedness between the US crude oil market and China's agricultural commodity markets. Energy Economics 76, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.10.031

Ma, F., Wei, Y., Chen, W., & He, F. (2018). Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using high-frequency data: Further evidence. Empirical Economics, 55, 653-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.10.014

Maheu, J. M., McCurdy, T. H., & Zhao, X. (2013). Do jumps contribute to the dynamics of the equity premium? Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfineco.2013.07.006

Mamoona, Z., Farhat, I., Abdul, R., & Naveed, S. (2022). Modeling and forecasting the realized volatility of bitcoin using realized HAR GARCH-type Models with jumps and inverse leverage effect. Sains Malaysiana, 51(3), 929-942. https://journalarticle.ukm.my/19176/

Massiniliano, C. (2022). The role of jumps in realized volatility modeling and forecasting. Financial Exonomtrics, 21(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbab030

Qua, H., Duana, Q. L., & Niu, M. Y. (2018). Modeling the volatility of realized volatility to improve volatility forecasts in electricity markets. Energy Economics, 74, 767-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.033

Sévi, B. (2014). Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using intraday data. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 643-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.01.019

Sharmaa, P., & Vipulb (2016). Forecasting stock market volatility using Realized GARCH model: International evidence. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.005

Shin, D. W. (2018). Forecasting realized volatility: A review. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 47(4), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2018.08.002

Soucek, M., & Todorova, N. (2013). Realized volatility transmission between crude oil and equity futures markets: A multivariate HAR analysis. Energy Economics, 40(C), 586-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.011

Tang, Y. S., Xiao, X., Wahab, M. I. M., & Ma, F. (2021). The role of oil futures intraday information on predicting US stock market volatility. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2020.10.004

Tran, M. H., & Tran, N. M. (2021). High frequency-based quantile forecast and combination: An Application to oil market. International Econometric Conference of Vietnam, 209–228. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-77094-5_19

Uludag, B. K., & Khurshid, M. (2019). Volatility spillover from the Chinese stock market to E7 and G7 stock markets. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2017-0014

Wei, K. (2021). Conditional covariance matrix forecast using the hybrid exponentially weighted moving average approach. Journal of Forecasting, 40(8), 1398 -1419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ for.2776

Wen, D. Y., He, M. X., Zhang, Y. J., & Wang, Y. D. (2021). Forecasting realized volatility of Chinese stock market: A simple but efficient truncated approach. Journal of Forecasting, 41(2), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2807

Wen, F. H., Gong, X., & Cai, S. H. (2016). Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using HAR-type models with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 59, 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eneco.2016.07.014

Yuan, P., & Li, R. (2018). Forecasting realized volatility based on the truncated two-scales realized volatility estimator (TTSRV): Evidence from China's stock market. Finance Research Letters, 25, 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.028

Zhong, J. H., Wang, M. D., Drakeford, B. M., & Li, T. H. (2019). Spillover effects between oil and natural gas prices: Evidence from emerging and developed markets. Green Finance, 1(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2019.1.30

Downloads

Published

27-10-2024

How to Cite

Ng, S. L., Chin , W. C., Chong , L. L., & Ng , K. W. (2024). Forecasting the Realized Volatility of Islamic Equities Using Multivariate Har-Type Models. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijbf2025.20.1.3

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-07
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijbf2025.20.1.3 OpenAlex W4403802169