A Requirements Management Tool for Small and Medium Projects: An Industrial Case Study
Keywords:
Requirements Management, Requirements Management Tool, Requirements Management PracticesAbstract
In the previous years, there are many requirements management tools available in the market. However, these tools are expensive, complicated, difficult to learn and too sophisticated for small and medium projects. This paper presents a case study of implementing a Requirements Management Tool for small and medium projects (RMT-SMP) in the real industry in order for the RMT-SMP to be feasible for small and medium projects. The case study carried out by defining the hypothesis, selection of the pilot study, identification of different methods of comparison, consideration of the effects of cofounding factors, planning of the case study, monitoring the case study as well as result analysis and report generation. The results have shown that the RMT-SMP is practical and feasible for the small and medium projects in the Malaysian software industry and encourages the practitioners to have a better approach in managing their requirements during software development projects.
Downloads
References
Carrillo de Gea, J.M., Nicolas, J., Aleman, J.L.F., Toval, A., Ebert, C., & Vizcaino, A. (2011). Requirements Engineering Tools. IEEE Journal Software, 28(4), 86 – 91,
Damian, D., Zowghi, D., Vaidyanathasamy, L., & Pal, Y. (2003). An Industrial Case Study of Immediate Benefits Of Requirements Engineering Process Improvement at the Australian Center for Unisys Software. Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, 9(1-2), 45-75.
Emam, K. E., & Birk, A. (2000). Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 Measure of Software Requirements Analysis Process Capability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(6).
Etish project, (2012). Online Document. URL: http://www.etish.org/ useme/about.html (retrieved on 11th April 2012).
Hammer, T., & Huffman, L. (1998). Automated Requirements Management – Beware HOW You Use Tools: An Experience Report. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Requirements Engineering (pp. 43-40). Los Alamitos, CA .
Hoffmann, M., Kuhn, N., Weber, M., & Bittner, M. (2004). Requirements for Requirements Management Tools. In: Preceedings of 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, (pp. 301-3080).
Kitchenham, B., & Pickard, L. (1995). Case Study for Method and Tool Evaluation. IEEE Software, 52-62.
Kotonya, G., & Sommervile, I. (1998). Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Lang, M., & Dunggan, J. (2001). A Tool to Support Collaborative Software Requirements Management. Requirements Engineering, 6(3), 161- 172.
Salzer, H. (1999). ATRs (Atomic Requirements) Used Throughout Development Lifecycle. In: 12th International Software Quality.
Sommervile, I., & Sawyer, P. (1997). Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide. Wiley, New York.
The Standish Group International. (1998). Special COMPASS. Report on Requirements Management Tool.
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslen, A. (2000) Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Young, R. R. (2004). The Requirements Engineering. Artech House, Boston. Zainol, A., & Mansoor, S. (2008). Investigation into Requirements
Management Practices in the Malaysian Software Industry. In:
Proc of International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp. 292--295. IEEE Computer Society .
Zainol, A., & Mansoor, S. (2009). A Survey of Software Engineering Practice in the Software Industry. In: Proc of IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering.
Zainol, A., & Mansoor, S. (2011). An Investigation of a Requirements Management Tool Elements In: Proc of IEEE Conference on Open System 2011. IEEE Computer Society.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.