Determinants of Corporate Environmental Accounting Disclosure of Oil and Gas Firms in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/gbmr2021.13.1.2Abstract
This study examines the cognitive factors that determine corporate environmental accounting
disclosures (CEAD). The population consists of all the fourteen (14) listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria.
Panel data were obtained from the annual reports and accounts of the firms for the period of 2010 to
2019. A correlational research design was used and the data were analyzed using the Generalized Least
Square regression (random model). The study found that firm size; leverage and multi-national
companies have positive significant influence on the CEAD of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria. Whilst
firm growth has a negative significant relationship with the CEAD of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria.
It is concluded that larger firms and multi-national companies in the Nigerian oil and gas sector have
high likelihood of disclosing environmental accounting information. Thus, it is recommended that the
management of listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria should expand their size by acquiring more assets,
maintain a consistent growth by exploring more opportunities while improving their gearing ratio to
ensure a stable balance between the proportion of debt and assets. It therefore, highlighted the need for
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to come up with enabling laws geared towards ensuring
that listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria embrace CEAD. Furthermore, Global Environmental Disclosure
Index (GEI) should be considered as the most acceptable yardstick for measuring environmental
accounting by the listed oil and gas firms in Nigeria.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
Global Business Management Review (GBMR) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Global Business Management Review (GBMR) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
Submission of an article is done with the understanding that the article has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) that it is not under consideration for publication somewhere else; that if and when the article is accepted for publication, the author's consent to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.