Understanding Why Mothers Can Lose Child Custody in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.1Keywords:
Child custody, Act 303, child preference, custodian qualification, loss of rightsAbstract
Custody decisions are tailored to the circumstances of each case based on related principles with protection of child welfare as courts’ paramount consideration. This paper seeks to understand custody issue from quantitative viewpoint through a conceptual model and examines how child custody principles have influenced loss decisions for mothers. The methodology used was content analysis and Chi-Square correlation, with usable data provided by 47 cases decided in Malaysia between 1987 and 2017 based on Act 303. Coding instrument and conceptual framework were developed with items covering presumption of maternal custody, custodian qualification and loss of rights, child’s and mother’s wishes. The findings revealed that mothers were less likely to lose custody cases and when they did their defeats were strongly influenced by factors relating to children’s preference and status quo arrangement. The results contribute to an understanding of how mothers can lose custody of their children and clarify whether some of the independent variables are used more regularly and are more predictive of the loss decisions than the others.
References
Abd Ghani, F., & Hashim, H. (2013). Challenges and locus control among single mothers in Muar, Johor. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(5), 760–765.
Abdul Kadir, N. B., & Bifulco, A. (2011). Vulnerability, life events and depression amongst Moslem Malaysian women: Comparing those married and those divorced or separated. Social Psychiatry, 46(9), 853-62.
Abdullah, R., Monsoor, T., Johari, F., & Mohd Radzi, W. (2015). Financial support for women under Islamic family law in Bangladesh and Malaysia. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 363-383. Amirul Azizan bin Abdul Rahim v. Faizah Fazlina bt Rosli [2010] 1 ShLr 51).
Andrea, C. (1986). Awarding custody: The best interests of the child and other fictions. Yale Law and Policy Review, 5(2), 267-290. Azizah bt Ibrahim v. Sufian bin Che Mud [2012] 4 ShLr 1).
Azzis, N. M. A., & Azhar, A., (2018). Pendekatan mediasi dalam tuntutan hadanah: Kajian di Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Pulau Pinang. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 3(9), 36-45.
Baharudin, R., Krauss, S. E., Yacoob, S. N., & Tan, J. P., (2011). Family processes as predictors of antisocial behaviors among adolescents from urban, single-mother Malay families in Malaysia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(4), 509522.
Che Soh, R., & Mohd Hashim, N. (2015). Children’s right in custodial disputes: The extent of the application of best interest of the child principle under the Malaysian Laws. Paper presented at the International Conference. 7th International Conference on
Humanities and Social Sciences “ASEAN 2015: Challenges and Opportunities” (Proceedings) Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University.
Che Soh, R. (2014). Children’s participation in custody and access proceedings. IIUM Law Journal, 22(1), 53-73.
Cypcs.uk (2019, February 2). https://www.cypcs.org.uk/rights/ uncrcarticles/article-
Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2005). A critical assessment of child custody evaluations: Limited science and a flawed system. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00020.x
Emily, S., Poppe, T., & Rachlinski, J. R. (2016). Do lawyers matter? The effect of legal representation in civil disputes. Pepperdine Law Review, 43(4), 881-942.
Evans, M. (2011). Single mothers in Malaysia: Social protection as an exercise of definition in search of solution. Paper presented at the International Conference: “Social Protection for Social Justice.” Institute of Development Studies, UK. Faridah bt Daud & Anor v. Mohd Firdaus Abdullah @ Jettle Francis (2005) 1 ShLR 153.
Hamid, S. R. A., & Salleh, S. (2013). Exploring single parenting process in Malaysia: Issues and coping strategies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1154-1159. Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 (Act 303).
Jbg.my (2019, February 25). http://www.jbg.gov.my/index.php/en/ faq/general
Kahar, R., & Mohd Zin, N. (2011). Child related policies and legislative reforms in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Policy and Society, 8, 6-36.
Kelly, J. B. (1994). The determinations of child custody. The Future of Children-Children and Divorce, 4(1), 121-142. Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act of 1976 (Act 164). Mohd Zin, N., Abdul Hak, N., Mohd, A., Abd Malek, N., Ibrahim, N.,
Che Soh, R., Md Hashim, N., & Ibrahim, B. (2016). Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Noornita bt Kamaruddin v. Faeiz bin Yeop [2004] CLJ (Sya) 198.
Rafiq, A. (2014). Child custody in classical Islamic law and laws of contemporary Muslim world (an analysis). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(5), 267-277. Syariah Court Civil Procedure (Sulh) (Federal Territories) Rules 2004.
Taylor, Z. E., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Promoting strengths and resilience in single mother-families. Child Development, 88(2), 350-358.
Thestar.m.y (2013, September 24). Authorities alarmed by high rate of divorce cases among Muslims. https://www.thestar.com.my/ news/community
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-10-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
