Frod dalam Urus Niaga Tanah: Satu Kajian Perbandingan dengan Undang-Undang Tanah Australia

Authors

  • Noraida Harun Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2012.3.5

Keywords:

frod, urus niaga tanah, jenis-jenis frod, cadangan dan penyelesaian, kajian Perbandingan

Abstract

Falsafah sistem Torrens ialah ia merupakan satu sistem pentadbiran tanah berasaskan pendaftaran. Sebagai asas sistem Torrens, pendaftaran adalah prasyarat hak milik yang tidak boleh disangkal. Kesan daripada pendaftaran ialah undang-undang mengurniakan kepada penerima pindah milik, pemajak atau pemegang gadaian atau penerima isemen, hak milik yang tidak boleh disangkal. Tetapi sejak mutakhir ini banyak kejadian jenayah kes frod dalam urus niaga tanah menunjukkan peningkatan dari masa ke semasa. Peningkatan kes-kes ini menimbulkan rasa bimbang oleh pemilik-pemilik tanah di atas keselamatan harta mereka kerana tanah mereka boleh bertukar milik tanpa disedari. Sehubungan dengan itu, artikel ini dibuat bagi membincangkan kes frod yang berlaku dalam konteks urus niaga tanah di Malaysia dan membuat perbandingan dengan undang-undang tanah Australia serta mengenal pasti apakah jenis-jenis frod yang berlaku dan seterusnya mencadangkan jalan penyelesaian yang difikirkan sesuai bagi menjamin kepentingan dan hak-hak semua pihak yang terlibat.

Katakunci: frod, urus niaga tanah, jenis-jenis frod, cadangan dan penyelesaian, kajian Perbandingan

References

Ain, Abd. Halim. “Penipuan dalam Urusan Tanah-Kelemahan, Amalan Terbaik Dan Cadangan Bagi Mengatasinya.” Jurnal Instun 1, Bil.2 (2008), www.instun.gov.my/index2. php?option=com_docman&task=doc... (akses pada 6 Februari 2010)

Arrunada, Benito. “Electronic Titling: Potential and Risks.” New Zealand Law Journal, (2010), http://www.econ.upf.edu/docs/ papers/downloads/1193.pdf (akses pada 11 Januari 2011). 100 Abd. Halim Ain, “Frod dalam Urusan Tanah-Kelemahan, Amalan Terbaik Dan Cadangan Bagi Mengatasinya,” Jurnal Instun 1, Bil.2 (2008), www.instun. gov.my/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc... (6 February 2010). 101 [2010] 2 MLJ 1

Christensen, Sharon. ”Electronic land Dealings in Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom: Lessons for Australia.” ELaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal Of Law 11, no. 4 (2004), http://eprints.qut.edu. au/10194/1/10194.pdf (akses pada 12 Januari 2011

Christensen, Sharon. Duncan, William. “Professional Liability and Property Transactions.” The Federation Press, 2004

Cocks, Russell. Barry, John,“ Electronic Conveyancing: Challenges For The Torrens System.” Australian Property Law Journal 8, no.3 (2001): 270-276

Dass, K.The Torrens System In Malaya. Singapura: Malayan Law Journal Limited.1963

Hammond, Celia. “The Abolition Of The Duplicate Certificate Of Title And Its Potential Effect On Fraudulent Claims Over Torrens Land.” Australian Journal of Property Law 8, (2000): 115

Ismail, Shukri. Electronic Land Administration System In Malaysia: The Need For New Enabling Provisions. http://www.kptg.gov. my/dmdocuments/my_documents/pdf/paper_3.pdf (akses pada 5 Mac 2010)

Kam, Kevin. Kanesalingam, Shanmuga. MLC 2010: Recent Federal Court’s Decision on section 340 of the National Land Code 1965: Tan Ying Hong v Tan Sian San & Ors Are Landowners and Banks Secured?. http://www.malaysianbar. org (akses pada 31 Julai 2010). Keang Sood, Teo. “Deferred Indefeasibility Reinstated in the Malaysian Torrens System: The End of an Unfortunate Saga.” Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, (2010): 26

Koshy, Shaila. “Your Land Can Land In The Wrong Hands.” The Star, August 8, 2010

Low, Rouhshi. “The Use Of Technology To Automate The Registration Process Within The Torrens System And Its Impact On Fraud: An Analysis.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology, 2008

Low, Rouhshi. Maintaining The Integrity Of The Torrens System In A Digital Environment: A Comparative Overview Of The Safeguards Used Within The Electronic Land Systems In Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom And Singapore. http://www.lexixnexis.com/my/legal/search/journalsubmitForm.do (akses pada 11 Januari 2011)

Low, Roushi. “From Paper To Electronic: Exploring The Fraud Risk Stemming from the Use of Technology to Automate the Australian Torrens System.” Bond Law Review 21, no.2 (2009)), http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol21/iss2/7/ (akses pada 13 Januari 2011)

Low, Roushi. “Opportunities For Fraud In The Proposed Australian National Electronic Conveyancing System: Fact Or Fiction?.” ELaw Journal:Murdoch University Electronic Journal Of Law 13, no. 2 (2006),.https://elaw.murdoch.edu.au/archives/ issues/2006/2/_elaw_Fraud_article_puba_191006doc.pdf (akses pada 13 Januari 2011)

Maidin, Ainul Jaria. “Historical Development of Land Law in Malaysia.” Dalam Principles Of Malaysian Land Law, disusun oleh Ainul Jariah, Sharifah Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, Bashiran Begum, et.al,45, Kuala Lumpur :Lexis Nexis, Malayan Law Journal, 2008

Maidin, Ainul Jariah. Kadouf, Hunud Abia. Weaknesses In The Registration Of Land Dealings System In Malaysia: Suggestions For Improvements For Enhancing The System. http://www.cljlaw.com/membersentry/articlesdisplayformat. asp?A_2010_1_LNS_l;torrens_system_and_land akses pada 13 Januari 2011)

Mills, Trevor. “Can There Be A Model Title Registration System.” Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES) Conference 2000, Sydney, Australia, 23-27 Januari, 2000

Idris, S.M. Gubal Kod Tanah Atasi Frod. http://pasbukitbendera. com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=883&i temid=44 (akses pada 26 Julai 2011)

Nicholson, Cheryl. Tan Ying Hong V. Tan Sian San & Ors [2010]: The Aftermath. http://www.cljlaw.com/membersentry/articles displayformat.asp?A_2010_6_CLJ_xxix;torrens_system_ and_land (akses pada 12 Januari 2011)

Othman, Suhaimi. “Frod Dalam Urusan Tanah: Isu dan Penyelesaian.” Jurnal INSTUN 1, Bil 2 (2008), http://www. instun.gov.my/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_ view&gid=189&Itemid=99999999 (akses pada 30 Julai 2011)

Said, Hussain. “Sistem e-tanah Ke Seluruh Negara”, Berita Harian, 25 May, 2007

Sathiaseelan, Joshua Kevin. Prinsip-prinsip Penting Perundangan Tanah di Malaysia. Selangor: Lexis Nexis Malayan Law Journal, 2006

Shaari, Hafiz. “Fraud dalam Urusan Pendaftaran hakmilik: Kajian Di Pejabat Pendaftar Hak, milik Negeri Selangor, Shah Alam.” Tesis Sarjana Muda, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2009

Shahriza, Nor. et al. “Identifying and Overcoming the Risk of Fraud in the Malaysian Electronic Land Administration System.” Kertas kerja dibentangkan di International Conference On Research and Innovation in Information System ICRIIS’11, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 23-24 November 2011

Sihombing, Judith. National Land Code, A Commentary. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Law Journal, 1992

Sinnadurai, Visu. Jual Beli Harta Tanah Di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 1996. Stanfield J, David. Underwood, Jeff. Gunaskera, Kirthimala. “Land Registration and Land Fraud in the United States”, kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di Seminar On Risk Reduction in Land Fraud, Shah Alam, Selangor, 22-23 Oktober,2008

Taylor, Greg. “The Torrens System in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.” Australian Property Law Journal 16 (2009): 307-308. Torrens R, Robert. The South Australian System By Registration of Title. Adelaide: Register and Observer General Printing Offices, 1859

Watkins, Paul. Fraud In Convenyancing,” kertaskerja yang dibentangkan di Australian Institute of Conveyancer2007 National Conference, New South Wales, 23-25 Mac 2007, http://www.stewartau.com/multimedia/relatedmedia/Fraud_ in_Conveyancing_AIC_National_Conference_Paper_2007. pdf (akses pada 13 Januari 2012)

Yusoff, Haizan.“ e-Tanah (e-Land) An Integrated land Administration System,” kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di Seminar on Risk Reduction in Land Fraud, Shah Alam, Selangor, 22-23 Oktober, 2008

Downloads

Published

01-12-2012

How to Cite

Harun, N. (2012). Frod dalam Urus Niaga Tanah: Satu Kajian Perbandingan dengan Undang-Undang Tanah Australia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 111-143. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2012.3.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-06
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/uumjls2012.3.5

Most read articles by the same author(s)