A Qualitative Analysis of Aftercare Supervision in the Juvenile Justice System in Malaysia: The Need for Legal Reforms

Authors

  • Nadzriah Ahmad Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Sheela Jayabala Krishnan@Jayabalan Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azlina Wati Nikmat Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Suzaily Wahab Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Naomi, E Goldstein Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA USA, United States
  • Amanda NeMoyer Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA USA, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2026.17.2.11

Keywords:

Aftercare supervision, juvenile justice system, risk factors, protective factors, system actors

Abstract

Despite the recent decline in juvenile crimes in Malaysia, children across the country continue to face formal processing and incarceration. Many children find it challenging to transition back into the community following their release from the institutions—especially given the lack of legal framework and guidelines in Malaysia for supporting children during the aftercare or re-entry process. To explore what system actors perceive as factors contributing to the challenges of aftercare supervision or re-entry, this study conducted 12 qualitative interviews with probation officers who supervise children during the aftercare process, and psychology officers who work with children during incarceration. A qualitative analysis of these interviews produced results that highlight critical gaps in Malaysia’s system of juvenile aftercare supervision. Results indicated that children often did not receive adequate support from the existing system of aftercare supervision and, therefore, face difficulty overcoming several aftercare challenges identified by system actors. These included negative peers and environment, and the lack of family involvement. The study has provided several recommendations for key stakeholders to spearhead reforms in addressing the needs of children participating in the aftercare supervision process in Malaysia. This study is significant as it will ensure that the children, following their release from the formal institutions, and in line with the international legal framework, are given the necessary support they need in aftercare supervision to help them during the reintegration process.

Author Biographies

  • Nadzriah Ahmad, Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

    Associate Professor Dr Nadzriah Ahmad

    Associate Professor

    Head, Child Law & Policy (RIG)

    Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM, Shah Alam, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Sheela Jayabala Krishnan@Jayabalan, Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

    Associate Professor Dr Sheela Jayabala Krishnan@Jayabalan

    Associate Professor

    Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

  • Azlina Wati Nikmat, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor

    Associate Professor Dr Azlina Wati Nikmat

    Associate Professor

    Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

     

  • Suzaily Wahab, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

    Professor Suzaily Wahab

    Professor

    Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Malaysia

  • Naomi, E Goldstein, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA USA

    Professor Naomi E. Goldstein

    Professor of Psychology

    Director of the Juvenile Justice Research and Reform Lab

    Department of  Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States

  • Amanda NeMoyer, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA USA

    Dr Amanda NeMoyer

    Associate Research Professor of Psychology

    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

References

Abrams, L. S., & Tam, C. C. (2018). Gender differences in desistance from crime: How do social bonds operate among formerly incarcerated emerging adults? Journal of Adolescent Research, 33(1), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558416684955

Abrams, L. S. (2006). From corrections to the community: Youth offenders’ perceptions to the challenges of transition. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 44(2-3), 31–53. https://doi.org/10. 1300/J076v44n02_02

Abrams, L. S. (2012). Envisioning life “on the outs”: Exit narratives of incarcerated male youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(6), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11415042

Ahmad, N., Jayabalan, S., Nik Mat, A., & Wahab, S. (2022). Aftercare programmes in the juvenile justice system in Malaysia: Are we doing enough for the child offenders? BiLD Law Journal 7(1), 16–24.

Altschuler, D. M., & Brash, R. (2004). Adolescent and teenage offenders are confronting the challenges and opportunities of reentry. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204003260048

Astrada, M. L. (2018). Reentry philosophies, approaches, and challenges. Judicature 102, 32-41.

Bares, K. J., & Mowen, T. J. (2020). Examining the parole officer as a mechanism of social support during reentry from prison. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6-7), 1023–1051. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0011128719881599

Barnert, E. S., Lopez, N., Pettway, B., Keshav, N., Abrams, L. S, Zima, B., & Chung, P. J. (2020). The role of parent engagement in overcoming barriers to care for youth returning home after incarceration. Journal of Community Health, 45(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00747-1

Beal, C. (2014). Insider accounts of the move to the outside: Two young people talk about their transitions from secure institutions. Youth Justice, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473 225413520362

Beitin, B. K. (2014). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. Sage Publications.

Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6(1), 1–22.

Bouchard, J., & Wong, J. S. (2018). Examining the effects of intensive supervision and aftercare programs for at-risk youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1509–1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0306624X17690449

Bouffard, J. A., & Bergseth, K. J. (2008). The impact of reentry services on juvenile offenders’ recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(3), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541 204007313384

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brogan, L., Haney-Caron, E., NeMoyer, A., & DeMatteo, D. (2015). Applying the risk-needs-responsivity (RNR) model to juvenile justice. Criminal Justice Review, 40(3), 277–302. https:/doi.org/10.1177/0734016814567312

BUILD. (2023). BUILD annual report 2022-2023: Homecoming. https://www.buildchicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/BUILD-2022-23-Annual-Report.pdf

Bullis, M., Yovanoff, P., & Havel, E. (2004). The importance of getting started right: Further examination of the facility-to-community transition of formerly incarcerated youth. The Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380020201

Bullis, M., Yovanoff, P., Mueller, G., & Havel, E. (2002). Life on the "outs"-Examination of the facility-to-community transition of incarcerated youth. Exceptional Children, 69(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290206900101

Chamberlain, A. W., Gricius, M., Wallace, D. M., Borjas, D., & Ware, V. M. (2018). Parolee–parole officer rapport: Does it impact recidivism? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3581–3602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17741593

Convention on the Rights of the Child, (1989, November 20). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd Ed.) SAGE Publications.

Davies, J. (2009). Practical research and evaluation: A start-to-finish guide by practitioners. SAGE Publications.

Davis, C., & Bahr, S. J., Ward, C. (2012). The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(4), 446–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812454748

Dempsey, M. P., Davis, W. M., Forbes, P., Penkoff, C. B., Gonsoulin, S., & Harris, P. W. (2021). Juvenile justice administrator perspectives: Reframing reentry around positive youth outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 46(3), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920965134

Department of Social Welfare. (2023). Statistics report 2023. Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development.

Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2025). Children statistics, Malaysia 2025.

Ferolino, A. J., & Yap, R. J. C. (2023). A narrative evaluation of a faith-based aftercare program for youth involved in the juvenile justice system. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 45(1) 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724221133452

General Comment No. 24. (2019) on Children’s Rights in the Child Justice System, CRC/C/GC/24. United Nation.

Gibbs, G. R. (2021). Analysing qualitative data. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/978152 6441867

Gill, C., & Wilson, D. B. (2017). Improving the success of reentry programs by identifying the impact of service–need fit on recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(3), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816682048

Gleicher, L. (2020). Effective Practices in community supervision model: Staff perceptions of the model and implementation. European Journal of Probation, 12(3) 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2066220320981175

Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. B. (2011). Factors that hinder offender reentry success: A view from community corrections officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09360661

Hanrahan, K., Gibbs, J. J., & Zimmerman, S. E. (2005). Parole and revocation: Perspectives of young adult offenders. The Prison Journal, 85(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505 279467

Hazel, N., & Bateman, T. (2021). Supporting children’s resettlement ('reentry') after custody: Beyond the risk paradigm. Youth Justice, 21(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225420923761

Heilbrun, K., Brock, W., Waite, D., Lanier, A., Schmid, M., Witte, G., Keeney, M., Westendorf, M., Buinavert, L., & Shumate, M. (2000). Risk factors for juvenile criminal recidivism: The postrelease community adjustment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027003001

Hermanowicz, J. C. (2002). The great interviews: 25 strategies for studying people in bed. Qualitative Sociology. 25(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021062932081

James, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Asscher, J. J., De Roo, A. K, & Van Der Laan, P. H. (2013). Aftercare programs for reducing recidivism among juvenile and young offenders: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.013

Jones, D. K., Barnes, C., & Garcia-Shinagawa, N. (2025). Causes of parole revocation through the lens of the youth: A qualitative analysis of potential factors. Crime & Delinquency 71(4), 995–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221145319

Kennedy, T. D., Edmonds, W. A., Millen, D. H., & Detullio, D. (2019). Chronic juvenile offenders: Exploring risk factor models of recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 17(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204018770517

Kurlycheck, M. C., Wheeler, A. P., Tinik, L. A., & Kempinen, C. A. (2011). How long after? A natural experiment assessing the impact of the length of aftercare service delivery on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 57(5), 1030-1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128710382262

La Vigne, N. G., & Kachnowski, V. (2005). Texas prisoners’ reflections on returning home. Urban Institute.

La Vigne, N. G., Visher, C., & Yahner, J. (2004). Chicago prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.

Lebel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807087640

Liu, L., Visher, C. A., & Sun, D. (2021). Do release prisoners' perceptions of neighborhood conditions affect reentry outcomes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(7), 764–789. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0887403420980806

Lodewijks, H. P. B., De Ruiter, C., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: A study in three samples of adolescent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334403

Majeed, T., Remond, M., Taylor, J., Edwards, L., Nyongesa, C., & Sullivan, E. (2025). A better future beyond the walls: Narrative review of best practices components of services and programs for people exiting custody. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 52(10), 1489–21507. https://doi.org/10. 1177/00938548251336796

Martinez, D. J., & Abrams, L. S. (2013). Informal social support among returning young offenders: A metasynthesis of the literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11428203

McCarter, S. A. (2016). Holistic representation: A randomized pilot study of wraparound services for first-time juvenile offenders to improve functioning, decrease motions for review, and lower recidivism. Family Court Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 54(2), 250–260. https://doi/ org/10.1111/fcre.12216

Mears, D. P., & Travis, J. (2004). Youth development and reentry. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204003260044

Mielke, M. (2024). Assessing aftercare reforms in Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 70(10), 2803–2825. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231170118 Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2013). The Malaysian juvenile justice system: A study of mechanisms for handling children in conflict with the law.

Mishra, R., & Dutta, S. (2024). Designing a mentorship curriculum for assisting social reintegration among youth in institutional care in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 164, 107870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107870

Mizel, M. L., & Abrams, L. S. (2020). Practically emotional: Young men's perspectives on what works in reentry programs. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(5), 658–670. https://doi.org/10. 1080/01488376.2019.1617225

Mowen, J. T., & Boman, J. H. (2019). Do we have it all wrong? The protective roles of peers and criminogenic risks from family during prison reentry. Crime Delinquency, 65(5), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718800286

Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & Van Marle, H. (2011). Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09356683

Myers, R., Goddard, T., & Davidtz, J. (2021). Reconnecting youth: Beyond individualised programs and risks. Youth Justice, 21(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225420932861

Panuccio, E. (2021). The expectations and challenges of youth re-entry. In A. Cox & L. S. Abrams (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of youth imprisonment (pp. 379–411). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68759-5_18

Panuccio, E. A., Christian, J., Martinez, D. J., & Sullivan, M. L. (2012). Social support, motivation, and the process of juvenile reentry: An exploratory analysis of desistance. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 51(3), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.618527

Rajah, V., Kramer, R., & Sung, H-E. (2014). Changing narrative accounts: How young men tell different stories when arrested, enduring jail time, and navigating community reentry. Punishment & Society, 16(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514527148

Rock, J., Mckenna, N., Vervalin, H., Rodriguez, D., Commodore-Mensah, M., Munshi, A., Boucher, I., & Duron, J. F. (2025). Resilience factors in reentry from juvenile legal facility settings: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 26(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10. 1177/15248380241309384

Rocque, M., Welsh, B. C., Greenwood, P. W., & King, E. (2014). Implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice in juvenile justice: A case study of a rural state. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(9), 1033-1057. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0306624X13490661

Rosaline, B. (2011). Introducing qualitative research: A student’s guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029034

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sancofa, J., Cox, A., Fader, J. J., Inderbitzin, M., Abrams, L. S., & Nurse, A. M. (2018). Juvenile corrections in the era of reform: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(7), 1763–1786. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0306624X17727075

Selimi, R., Roest, J., Stams, G. J., Hoebrechts, T., Graaf, E. V. D., Janssen, S., Snijder M., Llullaku, N., Van der Helm, P., Staaks, J., Koning, N., & Assink, M. (2025). Wiping the slate clean: A meta-analysis of post-detention aftercare programs for young offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 121, 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102640

Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications.

Sinclair, J., Unruh, D., & Kelly, K. (2021). Relationships matter: The role transition specialists play in youth’s reentry from the juvenile justice system. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420948838

Smith, K., & Davies, J. (2015). Practical research and evaluation: A start to finish guide by practitioners. SAGE Publications.

Solomon, A., Visher C, La Vigne, N, & Osborne, J. (2006). Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry. Urban Institute.

Spencer, M., & Jones-Walker, C. (2004). Interventions and services offered to former juvenile offenders re-entering their communities: An analysis of program effectiveness. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204003260049

Stansfield, R., Mowen, T. J., & O'Connor, T. (2018). Religious and spiritual support, reentry, and risk. Justice Quarterly, 35(2), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1306629

Steinberg, L., Chung, H. L., & Little, M. (2004). Reentry of young offenders from the justice system: A developmental perspective. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204003260045

Todis, B., Bullis, M., Weintrup, M., Schultz, R., & D’Ambrosio, R. (2001). Overcoming the odds: Qualitative examination of resilience among formerly incarcerated adolescents. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106800107

UNICEF strategic plan 2022–2025, 2022.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2021a). Estimating the number of children deprived of liberty in the administration of justice.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2025). Children deprived of liberty in the administration of justice: Global and regional estimates and trends.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2021b). Reimagine justice for children. United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of Their Liberty (A/RES/45/113) (1990) (Beijing Rules). http://daccessdds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/565/02/IMG/NR 056502.pdf?OpenElement

Vander Pyl, T. (2018). I wanna make my mom proud of me: Embracing mothers as protective factors against future offending in delinquent youth. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 69(3), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12117

Vidal, S., Oudekerk, B. A., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. (2015). Examining the link between perceptions of relationship quality with parole officers and recidivism among female youth parolees. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/154120 4013507959

Visher, C., & Courtney, S. (2007). One year out: Experiences of prisoners returning to Cleveland. Urban Institute.

Visher, C., Baer, D., & Naser, R. (2006). Ohio prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.

Visher, C., Kachnowski, V., La Vigne, N., & Travis, J. (2004). Baltimore prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.

Weaver, R. D., & Campbell, D. (2015). Fresh start: A meta-analysis of aftercare programs for juvenile offenders. Research on Social Work, 25(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315145 21302

Weaver, R. D. (2011). Aftercare Services. In C. J. Schreck (Ed.), The encyclopedia of juvenile delinquency. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wong, J. S., Lee, C., & Beck, N. (2024). The effects of aftercare/resettlement services on crime and violence in children and youth: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), e1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1404. e1404-n/a

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Ahmad, N., Krishnan@Jayabalan, S. J., Nikmat, A. W., Wahab, S., Goldstein, N. E., & NeMoyer, A. (2026). A Qualitative Analysis of Aftercare Supervision in the Juvenile Justice System in Malaysia: The Need for Legal Reforms. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 17(2), 194-215. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2026.17.2.11

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-20
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/uumjls2026.17.2.11 OpenAlex W7207602662 Scopus 105048441644

Most read articles by the same author(s)