An Analysis of Alternative Sentencing for Young Offenders Under Syariah Criminal Law in Malaysia and Brunei
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2026.17.2.2Keywords:
Alternative sentencing, young offenders, Syariah criminal law, taʿzir, legal framework, Malaysia, BruneiAbstract
Alternative sentencing has emerged as an important approach in addressing young offenders within the Syariah criminal justice system, particularly through mechanisms that emphasise rehabilitation and moral development. In both Malaysia and Brunei, the application of such sentencing is grounded in the principle of taʿzir, which allows judicial discretion in determining appropriate punishments. Accordingly, this study aims to analyse the legal frameworks and practices relating to alternative sentencing for young offenders under Syariah criminal law in Malaysia and Brunei. The study adopts a qualitative legal research approach, employing doctrinal and documentary analysis. It focuses on primary legal sources, including the Syariah Criminal Procedure (Federal Territories) Act 1997, the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, and relevant state enactments in Malaysia, as well as the Syariah Penal Code Order 2013 and the Syariah Courts Criminal Procedure Order 2018 in Brunei. Secondary sources, such as academic literature and institutional reports, are also examined to support the analysis. The findings suggest that both jurisdictions provide legal mechanisms for the application of alternative sentencing for young offenders, including admonition, good behaviour bonds, and supervisory measures. However, the
structure and implementation of these measures differ due to variations in legal frameworks, jurisdictional scope, and institutional arrangements. In Malaysia, the application of alternative sentencing operates within a federal structure where Syariah laws vary across states, whereas in Brunei, the legal framework is more centralised under national legislation. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a clearer understanding of the statutory provisions and institutional contexts that shape the application of alternative sentencing within different Syariah legal systems.
References
Abas, A., & Hussin, N. (2017). Community service order as alternative punishment in syariah court: An analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 25, 241–250.
Ahmad, M., Ahmad, M. H., & Nafees, S. M. M. (2021). Infancy and criminal responsibility under the Brunei penal code: An overview. The Law Review, 143–158. Akmal, N. A. D., Yahya, M. A., Rosli, M. S. D. A., Shariff, A. A. M., Rahman, M. R. A., & Nasri, M.
S. (2025). The application of alternative punishments for heretical teachings in the Sharia court. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 8963–8971. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000736
Azahari, N., & Dimon, Z. (2022). Amalan semasa pelaksanaan dan penguatkuasaan hukuman alternatif pemulihan menurut undang-undang syariah di Malaysia. Journal of Muwafaqat, 5(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v5i2 Child Act 2001 (Act 611) (Malaysia). Children and Young Persons Act (Chapter 219) (Brunei Darussalam). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1984. Fatwas and Institutional Opinions from Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia (JKSM).
Fauzan, F. (2022). Alternatives to criminal conviction in a comparative analysis of positive law and Islamic criminal law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(1), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4308
Guidelines issued by Department of Syariah Judiciary Malaysia. (2022). Report on the implementation of alternative sentencing in Syariah Courts.
Haji Marali, S. N., & Mahmud, H. (2024). The implications of khalwat offence on youth in Brunei Darussalam. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(4), 1795–1814. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i4.709
Haji Puteh, H. N., & Kurniawan, C. S. (2025). Reforming Islamic family law in Southeast Asia: A comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam. ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization (AJISC), 2(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.62976/ajisc.v2i1.1367
Hashim, H., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., & Baharuddin, A. S. (2024). Hukuman alternatif berorientasikan pemulihan ke atas pesalah jenayah: Analisis terhadap kesesuaian serta mekanisme pelaksanaannya di Mahkamah Syariah. LexForensica: Forensic Justice and Socio-Legal Research Journal, 1(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.33102/n202z962
Hashim, H., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Sahid, M. M., & Hasan, B. M. M. (2025). Transformation of the Syariah Court in Malaysia: Towards the implementation of alternative sentencing for criminal offences under Islamic family law. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Law, 2, 222–231.
Ismail, S. Z. (2024). Proposing diyat as an alternative to death penalty for the crime of murder in Malaysia. Jurnal Syariah, 32(3), 487-518.
Jumat, H. Z. (2019). Juvenile from the perspective of Brunei Darussalam’s legal system: An analysis. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(14), 50–65. Ketua Pendakwa Syar’ie v. Nurul Afiqah binti Norariffin & Nurul Shadatul Shayairah binti ShahriffinCase No.: BM/MTS/JEN-G/J014B/72/08-2019 and BM/MTS/JEN-G/J014B/73/08-2019 Syariah Court, Brunei Darussalam.
Mutiara, R., Putri, A. Y., & Viawan, M. R. (2025). Ta'zir and restorative justice: Alternative punishments from an Islamic perspective. Balada Al Mubaarok, 1(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.55555/bam.v1i1.13
Nael, A. Q. (2025). The Criteria for determination of tazeeri punishments in Islamic Jurisprudence. Addaiyan Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.36099/AJAHSS.7.5.3
Nafid, Y., Haidass, M. A., & Joraiche, S. (2024). The role of criminal alternatives as a future challenge in achieving security. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 19(1), 552–586. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19130
Nur, M., Ibrahim, I. A., Nisa, S. M., Alfarisi, M. A., & Afriadi, D. (2025). Negotiating legal pluralism: Sharia and civil law integration in Brunei Darussalam. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40916
Othman, N. A., Kurniawan, C. S., bin Husain, M. Z., & Sahid, M. M. (2026). Ta’zir punishment in the Mazhab Syafi’i and its application in Syariah Court of Brunei Darussalam. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 14(1), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v14i1.4538
Quraishi, M. (2020). Case study 2: The detention of sharī’ah offenders in Pusat Pemulihan Akidah (Islamic Rehabilitation Centres) in Malaysia. In Towards a Malaysian Criminology: Conflict, Censure and Compromise (pp. 117-140). Palgrave Macmillan
Saifuddin, S., Mohd Zahir, M. Z., Hashim, F. Y., Pg Musa, P. I., & Jamil, A. (2025). Challenges in the enforcement of Syariah criminal law on social media in Malaysia: A review from the perspective of Syariah evidence law. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 145(1), 42–54. Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 (Act 355) (Malaysia). Syariah Courts Criminal Procedure Order 2018 (Brunei Darussalam). Syariah Criminal Code (II) (Kelantan) Enactment 2019 (Malaysia). Syariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territories) Act 1997 [Act 559]. Syariah Criminal Offences (Ta’zir) Enactment (Terengganu) 2001. Syariah Criminal Procedure (Federal Territories) Act 1997 (Act 560) (Malaysia). Syariah Criminal Procedure Enactment (Kedah Darul Aman) 2014 (Malaysia). Syariah Criminal Procedure Enactment (Terengganu) 2001 (Malaysia). Syariah Penal Code Order 2013 (Brunei Darussalam).
UK.Rahman, A. H. A. (1999). Juvenile crime under Islamic law. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. UN Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (The Riyadh Guidelines), 1990. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing Rules), 1985.
Wahidah, W., Ab Rahman, S. F., & Hasan, M. H. M. (2024). A comparative analysis of Islamic inheritance practices in Malaysia and Indonesia: Legal frameworks, judicial interpretation, and community impact. ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization, 1(2), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.62976/ajisc.v1i2.1515
Wardi, F. (2021). Fiqh al-Jinayat in solving crimes committed by underage children. Malaysian Journal of Syariah & Law, 9, (2), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol9no2.319
Widyawati, A., Maskur, M. A., Aisy, R., Teeraphan, P., & Setyanto, H. (2025). The urgency of supervision institutions in implementing prisoners' rights as an effort to restructure criminal execution laws. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1
Yusoff, J. Z. M., Tahir, Z., & Jamaluddin, S. Z. (2025). The importance of probation reports in determining effective rehabilitation orders under the Malaysian child act 2001: A critical analysis. Malaysian Journal of Syariah & Law, 13(2), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no2.1199
Zawawi, M. R. M., Nasohah, Z., Omar, A. F., & Souit, S. H. (2025). Rethinking hisbah and sharia proceduralism: A comparative approach to justice in contemporary Islamic law. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 234-268. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10391
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UUM Journal of Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-20Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
