An Appraisal of Yemen’s Adherence to the TRIPS Agreement Standards on Civil and Criminal Enforcement Mechanisms of Copyright and Trademark Infringement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.7Keywords:
TRIPS agreement, enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs), civil procedures, criminal procedures, Yemen intellectual property (IP) lawsAbstract
The role of enforcement is crucial for the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs), as it provides the rights holders with access to legal tools and remedies essential for safeguarding their intellectual creations. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) establishes a comprehensive framework for the enforcement of IPRs, covering both procedural and substantive elements that member states are obligated to implement within their domestic laws. These provisions are designed to enable effective and timely actions against IPRs infringements. As a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Yemen is obligated to harmonise its national intellectual property (IP) legislation with the enforcement provisions specified in Part III of the TRIPS Agreement. This article analyses the existing IPRs enforcement mechanisms in Yemen, with particular emphasis on both civil and criminal procedures. Utilising the TRIPS Agreement as a framework, this article examines the extent to which the enforcement mechanisms and remedies provided under Yemeni law align with the requirements set forth by the TRIPS Agreement. By adopting a doctrinal legal method, the required data for this article is gathered from the relevant statutes, case law, the official website of Yemeni government agencies, law books, and journal articles. Utilising the TRIPS Agreement as a framework, this article examines the extent to which the enforcement mechanisms and remedies provided under Yemeni law align with the TRIPS requirements. The findings indicate that the civil and administrative procedures and remedies in Yemen's IP laws are largely consistent with the stipulations of the TRIPS Agreement. Nevertheless, there remains scope for enhancement, especially with regard to the evidentiary provisions. In terms of criminal enforcement, both the Trademarks Act 2010 and the Copyright Act 2012 criminalise deliberate acts of trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy, prescribing penalties that include imprisonment and fines. However, the existing penalties under these Acts are inadequate to serve as an effective deterrent against such violations. This shortcoming is in conflict with the requirements of Article 61 of the TRIPS Agreement, which mandates that penalties for these offences must be sufficiently severe to prevent future infringements. To ensure Yemen's full compliance with international standards and to enhance its efforts to combat trademark counterfeiting and copyright piracy, it is recommended that the country revise its IP laws to incorporate more stringent penalties, in alignment with the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement.
References
Abbott, F. M., Cottier, T., & Gurry, F. (1999). The international intellectual property system: Commentary and materials. Kluwer Law International.
Abdullah Bahamish v Muath Hamoud & Ahmed Hamoud. (2018). Case law collection of Aden Commercial Court. Abdulrahman Mohammed v Yassin, Helmi, Ayad, Abdul Wassa, Abdul Aziz, & Ahmed Salah. (2013). Case law collection of Aden Commercial Court.
Chatterton, E. (2023, December 12). A luxury brand guide to Asia Pacific customs powers in trademark enforcement. The Global Legal Post. https://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=Customs+authorities
Cornell Law School. (n.d.). Injunction. Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ injunction
Correa, C. M. (2020). Trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights: A commentary on the TRIPS Agreement. Oxford University Press.
Correa, C. M. (2022). Interpreting the flexibilities under the trip’s agreement. In C. M. Correa & R. M. Hilty (Eds). Access to medicines and vaccines: Implementing flexibilities under intellectual property law. (pp. 1-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83114-1_1
Cotter, T. F. (2021). Damages for noneconomic harm in intellectual property law. Hastings Law Journal, 72, 1055–1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565537
De Werra, J. (2016). Specialised intellectual property courts—Issues and challenges. In Global perspectives for the intellectual property system (Issue No. 2, pp. 15–41). CEIPI-ICTSD. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2761209
Dinwoodie, G. B., & Dreyfuss, R. C. (2012). A neofederalist vision of TRIPS: The resilience of the international intellectual property regime. Oxford University Press.
Faujura, R. P., Gultom, E., & Sudjana. (2021). The monopoly practice and unfair business competition in the technology transfer activity through the foreign patent in Indonesia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2021.12.1.4
Gawas, V. M. (2017). Doctrinal legal research method: A guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development. International Journal of Law, 3(5), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.22271/law
Geiger, C. (2012). Counterfeiting and piracy in international law: TRIPS and beyond. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 43(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-012-0027-7
General Directorate of Intellectual Property Protection. (2015). 2015 Performance Report. Business Services Sector, Republic of Yemen Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Gervais, D. J. (2021). The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting history and analysis (5th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Ho, C. (2011). Access to medicine in the global economy: International agreements on patents and related rights. Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
Jandab, A. (2019). IT-based innovation and new product development performance in Yemen: The moderating role of intellectual property. International Journal of Business Society, 3(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.30566/ijo-bs/2019-11-1.
Llewelyn, D. (2015). Assessment of damages in intellectual property cases: Some recent examples of “the exercise of a sound imagination and the practice of a broad axe”? Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 27, 480–505.
Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (2005). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
Mohamed, K. (2012). Trademark counterfeiting: Comparative legal analysis on enforcement within Malaysia and the United Kingdom and at their borders [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University]. Newcastle University eTheses Repository.
Mohamed, K. (2016). Combining methods in legal research. The Social Sciences, 11(21), 5191–5198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.5191.5198
Mohamed, K., & Wahid, R. (2014). Fighting counterfeiting: Importance of enforcement of intellectual property rights. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 9(4), 249–257.
OECD & European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2021). The trade in fakes: A first glance. In Global trade in fakes: A worrying threat. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/48d06cef-en
Omolo, J. A. (2018). Criminal procedures and penalties for infringement of intellectual property rights in Kenya. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(8), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx225
Otten, A. (2020). The TRIPS negotiations: An overview. In A handbook on the WTO TRIPS Agreement (pp. 55–78). WTO Publications. https://doi.org/10.30875/00344762-en
Peppo, E., & Bode, J. (2023). Criminal enforcement of intellectual property rights: An overview and comparative analysis of the Balkans. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18(12), 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad089
Sadiq Muhammad v Adeeb Fadl. (2020). Case law collection of Aden Commercial Court.
Saeed Abdul Jabbar v Yasin Abdullah. (2013). Case law collection of Aden Commercial Court.
Taubman, A. (2011). Rationale and design of the WTO enforcement system. In C. M. Correa (Eds.), Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules (Vol. 1, pp. 597–635). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Tingting, D., & Al Hanhanah, A. N. M. (2017). Assessing the impact of Yemen legal system on economic agreements and foreign investments. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(12).
Viglioni, M. T. D. (2023). Effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic activity: A non-linear perspective from Latin America. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.09.001.
Wilkinson, G. (2023). Article 47 TRIPS—Right of information. In P. T. Stoll & P. H. Holger (Eds.), Commentaries on World Trade Law Online. Nijhoff: Brill.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). World intellectual property report 2023: The direction of innovation. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4599
World Trade Organization. (1995). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm
World Trade Organization. (2014, May 27). Yemen to become 160th WTO member. WTO News. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news14_e/acc_yem_27may14_e.htm
World Trade Organization. (2024). Briefing note: Yemen’s accession to the WTO. https://www.wto. org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/mc9_e/brief_acc_yemen_e.htm
World Trade Organization. (2024). Intellectual property: Protection and enforcement. https://www. wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm
World Trade Organization. (2024). Overview: The TRIPS Agreement. https://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm
World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Module VIII: Enforcement. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_ e/trips_e/ta_docs_e/modules8_e.pdf
Wu, P., & Weng, X. (2021). Old wine in a new bottle? Assessing the injunction remedy for intellectual property disputes in China. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(3), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2021.03.02
Yu, A. (2022). A brand owner’s guide to creating a customs outreach & training programme in Asia. World Trademark Review. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2022/a-brand-owner-s-guide-to-creating-a-customs-outreach-and-training-programme-in-asia
Yu, P. K. (2007). Intellectual property and the information ecosystem. Michigan State Law Review, 2007(1), 1–55.
Yu, P. K. (2017). The objectives and principles of the TRIPS Agreement. In M. Burri & T. Cottier (Eds.), The regulation of services and intellectual property (pp. 255–322). Routledge.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UUM Journal of Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-07Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- Scopus 3 View →
- OpenAlex 0 View →
- Semantic Scholar 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
