The Role and Challenges of Public Participation in Law Formation in Indonesia: A Democratic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2026.17.2.3Keywords:
Consensus, public participation, law formation process, democratic legitimacy, IndonesiaAbstract
This study investigates the challenges and inefficacy of public participation in Indonesia’s law formation process, focusing on its legal framework and democratic implications. The study adopts a doctrinal approach, employing both a conceptual and comparative framework to investigate public
involvement in law-making from a democratic perspective. The study finds that vague legal provisions hinder meaningful public participation and recommends the establishment of explicit legal mechanisms to enforce public engagement. The findings indicate a pressing need for clearer, more detailed regulations governing public participation in the legislative process. Legislators should consider implementing formal feedback mechanisms early in the drafting phase to ensure inclusivity. In addition, involving a broad cross-section of the public may help reduce conflicts and create more representative and widely accepted laws. This study highlights critical gaps in the current regulatory approach to public participation in law-making and proposes the creation of mechanisms to enhance its effectiveness. The study’s value lies in its recommendation for a pre-legislative review process that could improve accountability and public trust in democratic governance. It contributes to the academic discourse on public participation by suggesting legal innovations to bridge the gap between legislative intentions and public expectations.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (2020). A ladder of citizen participation. In R. T. LeGates, & F. Stout (Eds.), The City Reader (pp. 290–302). Routledge.
Bakhtiar, H. S., & Fauzan, M. (2024). Conceptualization of the expansion of the authority of the Supreme Court as a dispute settlement institution for authority of state institutions outside the constitution. Unram Law Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v8i1.285
Balla, S. J., & Dudley, S. E. (2004). Stakeholder participation and regulatory policymaking in the United States. Information Society, 1(1).
Bo’a, F. Y. (2018). Pancasila sebagai sumber hukum dalam sistem hukum nasional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1512
Buana, M. S. (2024). Form review and judicial independence: A comparative perspective. Constitutional Review, 10(2), 340-366. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1023
Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
Chiweza, A. L. (2021). Discursive construction of citizen participation in democratic decentralisation discourses in Malawi. Journal of Humanities, 29(1), 23–55.
Choudhry, S., & Howse, R. (2000). Constitutional theory and the Quebec secession reference. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 13(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900000370
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Røvik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Cuéllar, M.-F. (2005). Rethinking regulatory democracy. Administrative Law Review, 57, 411.
Dahl, R. A. (2001). Perihal demokrasi: Menjelajah teori dan praktek demokrasi secara singkat. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 27/PUU-VII/2009 concerning the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 60/PUU-XIX/2020 concerning the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 2020 regarding Amendments to Law No. 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Judicial Review of Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation.
Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (Eds.). (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press.
Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undangan. (2010). Pedoman pengharmonisasian, pembulatan, dan pemantapan konsepsi rancangan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Gaventa, J., & Valderrama, C. (1999). Participation, citizenship and local governance. Background Note for the Workshop “Strengthening Participation in Local Governance. Institute of Development Studies.
Gerung, R. (2010). Representasi, kedaulatan, dan etika public. Jentera Jurnal Hukum, 20(5).
Haliim, W. (2016). Demokrasi deliberatif Indonesia: Konsep partisipasi masyarakat dalam membentuk demokrasi dan hukum yang responsif. Masyarakat Indonesia, 42(1), 19–30.
Halim, A. (2016). Posisi ideologi pancasila dalam sistem ketatanegaraan: Suatu kajian filsafat. Law Research Review Quarterly, 2(1), 517–532.
Hidayat, M. F., & Ambarsari, R. (2020). Annotation on the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 46/PUU-XIV/2016 in the perspective of legal hermeneutics. Nurani Hukum, 3(2), 1–14. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v3i2.8573
Holmes, S. (1995). Passions and constraint: On the theory of liberal democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Hsb, A. M. (2017). Mengkritisi pemberlakuan teori fiksi hukum (Criticising enactment of law fiction theory). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure. 2016.V16.251-264
Huda, N. M. (2014). Hak politik tentara nasional Indonesia dan kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia pasca reformasi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 21(2), 203-226. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss2.art3
Imran, I., Bakhtiar, H. S., & Achmad, D. (2020). Legal standing and authority of the Regional Representative Council in the Indonesia constitusional system. Amsir Law Journal, 1(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v1i2.23
Indiyastutik, S. (2016). Demokrasi radikal menurut Jacques Rancière. Diskursus-Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi STF Driyarkara, 15(2), 130–166.
Indiyastutik, S. (2019). Disensus: Demokrasi sebagai perselisihan menurut Jacques Renciere. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2008, December 30). Legislasi yang mati rasa.
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan: Jenis, fungsi dan materi muatan. Kanisius.
Jati, R. (2012). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang yang responsif. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(3), 329–342.
Karpowitz, C. F., & Raphael, C. (2014). Deliberation, democracy, and civic forums: Improving equality and publicity. Cambridge University Press.
Kompas. (2022, March 11). Dugaan pelanggaran HAM saat aksi” Reformasi dikorupsi” menguat.
Landemore, H., & Page, S. E. (2015). Deliberation and disagreement: Problem solving, prediction, and positive dissensus. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14(3), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1470594X14544284
Mahardika, P., & Satria, D. (2023). Public opposition to the new criminal code in Indonesia: A human rights perspective. Asian Law Journal, 15(1), 57–73.
Mahendrawati, N. L. M., Wisnumurti, A. G. O., & Sujana, I. N. (2020). Regulatory for structuring of small business in developing tourism destination. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tourism, Management and Technology (ICTMT 2019).
Manaf, H. A., Mohamed, A. M., & Lawton, A. (2016). Assessing public participation initiatives in local government decision-making in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 812-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1035788
Mansurnoor, I. A. (2008). Formulating and implementing a sharia-guided legal system in Brunei Darussalam: Opportunity and challenge. Sosiohumanika, 1(2), 219–248.
Maphazi, N., Raga, K., Taylor, J. D., & Mayekiso, T. (2013). Public participation: A South African local government perspective. African Journal of Public Affairs, 6(2), 56–67.
Maulana, M. R. (2019). Upaya menciptakan produk hukum berkualitas konstitusi melalui model preventif review. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4), 774–795. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1545
Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22.
Mill, J. S. (2015). On liberty, utilitarianism, and other essays. Oxford University Press.
Mochtar, Z. A., Arizona, Y., Rahman, F., Mubdi, U., Ruhpinesthi, G. E., & Wafi, M. A. (2024). From meaningful to meaningless participation: The tragedy of Indonesia’s omnibus law on job creation. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(2), 351-370.
Mulyana, I., & Kurniati, N. (2024). Public participation in environmental matters: Indonesia’s brief reflection. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(1), 61-95. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i1.1508
Mushkat, R. (2002). Public participation in environmental law making: A comment on the international legal framework and the Asia-Pacific perspective. Chinese J. Int'l L., 1, 185.
Paliokaitė, A., & Sadauskaitė, A. (2023). Institutionalisation of participative and collaborative governance: Case studies of Lithuania 2030 and Finland 2030. Futures, 150, 103174.
Pasaribu, H. B. (2007). Arah pembangunan hukum menurut UUD 1945 hasil amandemen dari perspektif Program Legislasi Nasional. Majalah Hukum Nasional.
Pelkonen, A. (2004). Questioning the Finnish model–Forms of public engagement in building the Finnish information society (STAGE Discussion Paper No. 5). STAGE (Science, Technology and Governance in Europe).
Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia. (2021). Catatan akhir tahun PSHK: Masa depan partisipasi publik dalam proses legislasi.
Putri, R. D., & Adam, A. (2019, April 11). DPR 2014-2019 malas bekerja tapi boros anggaran. Tirto.id.
Rancière, J. (2011). The thinking of dissensus: Politics and aesthetics. In. P. Bowman & R. Stamp (Eds.). Reading Rancière (pp. 1–17). Continuum.
Redi, A. (2019). Hukum pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sinar Grafika.
Riskiyono, J. (2015). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembentukan perundang-undangan untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-masalah Sosial, 6(2), 159-176.
Riyanto, B. (2020). National law development in New Normal Era. Indonesian Law Journal, 13(2), 87–107.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. Academic Press.
Saragih, T. M. (2011). Konsep partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah rencana detail tata ruang dan kawasan. Sasi, 17(3), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v17i3.361
Schneckener, U. (2002). Making power-sharing work: Lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0022343302039002004
Setiadi, W., Sadiawati, D., Meliala, A. J., Bakhtiar, H. S., & Harefa, B. (2021). The role of Indonesia Constitutional Court decision in the process of establishing the law: A case study in the process of establishing the law on general elections. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(1).
Setiawan, A., Suwaryo, U., & Rahmatunnisa, M. (2020). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan desa di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Academia Praja, 3(2), 251–270.
Simanjuntak, E. (2019). Peran yurisprudensi dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 83–104.
Sirajuddin, D. (2015). Legislative drafting metode partisipatif dalam pembentukan pereaturan perundang-undangan. Setara Pers.
Talib, N. S. (2002). A resilient monarchy: The Sultanate of Brunei and regime legitimacy in an era of democratic nation-states. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 4(2), 134–147.
Timney, M. M. (2014). Models of citizen participation: Measuring engagement and collaboration. In Cheryl Simrell King (Ed.), Government is us 2.0 (pp. 100–114). Routledge.
Trubek, D. M. (1984). Where the action is: Critical legal studies and empiricism. Stanford Law Review, 36, 575–622.
Van Bouwel, J., & Van Oudheusden, M. (2017). Participation beyond consensus? Technology assessments, consensus conferences and democratic modulation. Social Epistemology, 31(6), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1352624
Vanberg, V. J. (2005). Market and state: The perspective of constitutional political economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000032
Verma, V. (2019). A crisis of representation: Interests, identities and politics. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394481119849289
Wahjono, P. (2014). Demokrasi dan pemilu di Indonesia. In J. M. Gaffar (Ed.), Khasanah peradaban hukum dan konstitusi. Konstitusi Press.
Widiati, E. P. (2018). Efficient public participation in the local law-making process. Yuridika, 33(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8914
Wijayanti, W. (2016). Eksistensi undang-undang sebagai produk hukum dalam pemenuhan keadilan bagi rakyat (analisis putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 50/PUU-X/2012). Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(1), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1018
Zondi, S. I., & Reddy, P. S. (2016). The constitutional mandate as a participatory instrument for service delivery in South Africa. Administratio Publica, 24(3), 27–51.
Zook, D. C. (2012). Reforming North Korea: Law, politics, and the market economy. Stanford Journal of International Law, 48, 131–183.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UUM Journal of Legal Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-21Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
